Palantir Technologies Inc. closed at 134.85 USD, up 1.87%. The options market saw significant activity, with a large bullish call purchase dominating the flow and indicating a positive directional bias among sophisticated traders.
>>>Click to claim your commission-free cards before trading!
Options Indicators
PLTR’s implied volatility is 72.41%, and with an IV percentile of 93.63%, current option volatility is clearly in an elevated regime, indicating that options are priced expensively versus most of the past year. The IV/HV ratio of 1.31 further suggests implied volatility is running above realized volatility, meaning the market is embedding a meaningful premium for forward uncertainty. In this setup, outright option buying faces a relatively high volatility cost, while premium-selling structures or defined-risk spreads may offer a more efficient way to express a view. The Call/Put volume ratio is 2.63.
Large Trades
A CALL buy worth $0.25 million was the largest highlighted trade, with 1,494 contracts purchased at the 138.00 strike expiring on 2026-07-24. With PLTR referenced at $134.85, this call was out of the money at execution, making it a clearly bullish directional bet that requires upside in the stock to gain intrinsic value by expiration. The buyer paid premium for near-term upside exposure, suggesting expectations for continued strength or a short-dated upside catalyst rather than a hedging posture.
A same-direction double PUT sale worth $0.03 million was the other displayed large trade, structured as a premium-collecting short-put combination at the 100.00 strike expiring on 2026-07-31. The trade was executed for a net credit and reflects a neutral-to-bearish volatility view in the classification provided, though strategically it is primarily a premium-collection and range-bound expression, as both short puts were far out of the money versus the $134.85 stock reference. By selling downside premium well below spot, the trader appears comfortable with PLTR holding above 100.00 into expiration and is monetizing elevated downside insurance demand rather than pressing an outright aggressive bearish bet.
Overall large-trade sentiment was bullish, with total bullish flow at $0.25 million versus total bearish flow of $0.03 million, leaving a net difference of $0.23 million to the bullish side. The directional judgment is therefore clearly positive, because the dominant trade was an outright out-of-the-money call purchase, while the only opposing flow was a much smaller premium-selling put structure that looks more like income generation around a wide downside buffer than strong conviction on lower prices. Taken together, the large-trade profile suggests traders were more focused on upside participation in PLTR than on positioning for meaningful weakness.
Strategy Reference
Given the elevated IV, a seller looking for low assignment probability could consider selling out-of-the-money puts at a strike like $100.00; for those who prefer not to post significant margin, a bull call spread using the $135 and $145 strikes for a July expiration could be a defined-risk alternative to an outright long call.
Comments