From October 20 to 22, along the banks of Shanghai's Huangpu River, the 2026 Sustainable Global Leaders Conference returns once again. Nobel and Turing Award winners will take the stage to discuss the future and trends of technology, and the internet-famous professor who "rescues" people from anxiety and involution—Macfarlane—will hold a live dialogue with Xiang Biao!
Limited seats available, first come first served. Let us join together for the appointment with sustainability! [Click to register] Source: Jin10 Data
Federal Reserve Chairman Warsh is attempting to break free from forward guidance and even evaluate eliminating the "dot plot" in order to build a "quiet central bank." But this has triggered strong internal opposition, with officials worried that leaving policy blank will amplify misjudgments, and instead force several senior officials to speak intensively to correct course.
Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh is pushing a disruptive communications revolution inside the Fed. He advocates sharply reducing the Fed's public hints about the future interest rate path, weakening and possibly even canceling the quarterly "dot plot" that the market watches so closely, and instead letting investors price based on economic data themselves. In Warsh's view, overly transparent forward guidance turns market prices into an "echo chamber" of the central bank's own remarks, distorting the ability of asset prices to reflect the real economy.
However, as soon as this new policy of embracing silence was tested, it stirred up a surging wave of opposition inside the Fed. Many policymakers said bluntly that the central bank's responsibility to manage expectations is indispensable, and deliberately staying silent not only fails to bring rationality, but instead causes markets to frequently fall into violent swings because they lack a reference point.
Cleveland Fed President Hammack publicly questioned this. She said directly that if someone could prove that not speaking helps households and businesses make better decisions and boosts the central bank's credibility, she would be willing to listen, but "this is a very hard argument to sustain."
The real trading turmoil quickly confirmed internal concerns. After the Fed raised rates to 3.75%–4.00% in September, Warsh did not provide a clear framework for the pace of subsequent tightening, and the market immediately front-ran aggressively, betting on consecutive rate hikes. At the critical moment, New York Fed President Williams and Fed Vice Chair Jefferson spoke one after another to suppress overly hawkish expectations, barely calming the market agitation.
Former Fed Vice Chair and current PIMCO global economic adviser Richard Clarida pointed out that investors are highly focused on the remarks of these two core officials because they and the chair form the "troika" of policy decision-making. This intensive speaking is essentially other senior officials being forced to fill the expectations vacuum that Warsh deliberately left behind.
Fed Governor Waller also warned that completely erasing policy signals can easily trigger asset mispricing. Once the market mistakenly believes tightening is intensifying, pushing up Treasury yields and mortgage rates, it is tantamount to letting financial markets arbitrarily carry out a destructive round of "extra rate hikes" on behalf of the central bank; conversely, if the market underestimates the intent to tighten, premature easing will erode the achievements of fighting inflation.
As U.S. September CPI rebounded to 3.7% year over year, rate hike expectations for the October meeting once again fell into deadlock. The market's excessive sensitivity to a single data point fully exposed the shortcomings of the "silence strategy"—what investors need is not only the numbers, but also an analytical framework for how the central bank weighs inflation and growth.
Warsh publicly praises the obscurity and restraint of former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan's era, but this orientation actually challenges modern central bank theory over the past two decades, which has centered on improving transparency—ironically, the research proving the value of forward communication just won the Nobel Prize in Economics this year.
Comments