Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell will appear at the Supreme Court to observe the oral arguments in the case concerning Fed Governor Lisa Cook, marking a rare public show of support.
On January 21st, the U.S. Supreme Court will hold oral arguments for the case involving Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. According to the Associated Press, citing sources familiar with the matter, Powell will be present at the Supreme Court to observe the proceedings.
UBS stated bluntly in a report on the 16th that this trial concerns the very survival of the Federal Reserve's independence. If the court rules that it permits the White House to bypass the Federal Reserve Act "for cause" to remove Governor Lisa Cook, the legal pathway to firing Powell himself would be flung wide open.
The Department of Justice previously issued a grand jury subpoena to the Federal Reserve and Powell, investigating whether he misled Congress in his testimony concerning the management of a Fed office renovation project.
Powell's term as Chair concludes on May 15, 2026, but his term as a Governor extends until January 31, 2028.
The conflict stems from last August.
Trump publicly declared his intention to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook, who was appointed by Biden, alleging her involvement in mortgage fraud.
Cook has denied the allegations and has not been charged to date. She subsequently filed a lawsuit to retain her position. The Supreme Court issued a temporary order last October allowing her to remain in her post until the case is resolved.
Powell disclosed last week that the Trump administration had issued a subpoena to the Fed and even threatened him with criminal charges.
UBS analysis suggests that if the administration persists with criminal charges against Powell and Senate Republicans block any new nomination, the FOMC might opt for Powell to remain as a Governor after his term as Chair ends. He could potentially even be re-elected as FOMC Chair, serving as a bulwark against Trump's aggressive push for interest rate cuts.
The outcome of the Cook case will define the boundaries of presidential power.
Fed Governors serve fourteen-year terms and can only be removed for cause, a design specifically intended to insulate them from political pressure and ensure monetary policy independence.
If Trump's attempt is endorsed by the Supreme Court, it would set a precedent for any future president to follow, fundamentally undermining the foundation of the Fed's decision-making.
Powell's presence in the hearing room signals that this struggle has escalated beyond personal disputes into a defense of the institutional rules governing the central bank's existence.
What Trump wants is not merely a compliant Governor, but a Federal Reserve that executes his will.
By being there, Powell is saying no.
Comments