In the first quarter of this year, two manufacturing sectors faced significant challenges: consumer electronics and new energy vehicles. Rising memory chip prices led to increased costs for smartphones and computers, dampening consumer purchasing interest. Meanwhile, the new energy vehicle sector experienced weakened demand, partly due to consumers advancing purchases ahead of anticipated subsidy reductions at the end of last year.
Sales figures for new energy vehicles are easily verifiable. Take Byd Company Limited as an example: its recent March production and sales report revealed a key metric—cumulative sales from January to March fell by 30% year-over-year, largely reflecting broader industry trends.
However, a footnote in the announcement noted that "exports of new energy vehicles in March totaled 120,000 units." This raises the question: what does this figure signify? From two perspectives, dividing 120,000 by Byd Company Limited's total March sales of 300,000 units shows exports accounting for 40% of sales. Comparing this to the 73,000 units exported in March of the previous year reveals a nearly 65% year-over-year growth.
These calculations highlight Byd Company Limited's impressive export performance. This prompts the question: does this indicate a broader resurgence in the new energy vehicle sector? Let’s examine the industry from both volume and pricing perspectives.
First, sales volume. Regular readers are familiar with the monthly tracking of five emerging automakers' sales. The latest data shows rapid sequential growth for most, excluding Xiaomi, whose figures remain undisclosed. Leapmotor, XPeng, and NIO each saw growth exceeding 70%, while Li Auto's breakthrough of 40,000 units is particularly noteworthy.
How did traditional automakers perform? Sequential growth was also robust. Examples include: - Byd Company Limited: 300,000 units, up 58% month-over-month; - Geely: 230,000 units, up 13%; - Chery: 240,000 units, up 64%; - Great Wall: 110,000 units, up 46%.
Some may question the absence of Harmony series data. While comprehensive figures are not yet available, Seres reported AITO sales of 20,000 units, doubling from the previous month.
Thus, it is evident that although domestic new energy vehicle sales declined year-over-year in the first quarter, March saw a sequential rebound from February, with emerging automakers generally outpacing traditional ones in growth.
Returning to Byd Company Limited's export growth of 65%, how did other automakers fare? The results are equally striking: - Chery exported 150,000 units, up 72% year-over-year, maintaining exports above 100,000 units for 11 consecutive months; - Changan exported 100,000 units, up 60% month-over-month, marking its first time exceeding 100,000 units; - Geely exported 82,000 units, surging 120% year-over-year; - Great Wall exported 47,000 units, accounting for 45% of its total sales.
This is significant. With domestic sales under pressure, breakthroughs in overseas markets offer a beacon of hope. Recent conflicts in the Middle East have spurred overseas demand for new energy vehicles, representing a major marginal shift.
Next, pricing. The new energy vehicle sector is often associated with intense competition and frequent price wars. Initially, automakers resorted to direct price cuts, later shifting to interest rate incentives or purchase benefits, and more recently, adding features without raising prices—all in an effort to capture market share.
However, a trend toward price increases has recently emerged: - Tesla led the way, raising prices for two Model Y versions by 20,000 yuan; - Xiaomi followed, increasing prices for its entire SU7 series by 4,000 yuan; - Byd Company Limited also adjusted prices upward for its Song and Han models by several thousand yuan; - XPeng, Li Auto, and Leapmotor quietly reduced purchase benefits, effectively raising prices indirectly.
Why the shift? The primary driver is rising costs. Lithium carbonate prices have surged from 70,000–80,000 yuan per ton to 150,000–180,000 yuan, while automotive-grade chips and memory chips have skyrocketed by 300%. On average, the cost of a new energy vehicle priced between 150,000 and 200,000 yuan has increased by 4,000–5,000 yuan.
Recall the discussion earlier this year about price increases as a key theme? If only upstream costs rise, it negatively impacts the entire supply chain. Only when these increases gradually pass through to midstream and downstream segments can the benefits be broadly shared.
A remaining question is whether consumers will accept higher prices. Informal checks with industry contacts and dealership sales staff suggest that while foot traffic increased in March, conversion rates remained low, as many customers adopted a wait-and-see approach.
Historical patterns indicate that if price stability or further increases are confirmed, hesitant buyers may expedite purchases. The sustainability of price hikes will be critical to monitor.
In summary, on the volume front, domestic new energy vehicle sales showed sequential growth in March, with exports standing out. Regarding pricing, some automakers have begun raising prices directly or indirectly, suggesting the end of the deep discounting phase.
While these developments offer hope, investing in the sector remains challenging. The automotive industry is often described as a "subtraction game," not only due to low profitability margins but also because of uncertain competitive dynamics.
Vehicles are consumer goods but not essentials, often carrying personalized and differentiated attributes. Today’s younger buyers prioritize trendiness and innovation, and preferences have evolved rapidly in recent years: - Electrification was once the trend, with Byd Company Limited as a prime example; - This shifted to智能化, represented by brands like AITO; - More recently,网红化, emphasizing aesthetics and appeal, as seen with Xiaomi; - Currently,平权化—high specs at low prices—exemplified by Leapmotor, XPeng MONA, and NIO’s Ledao.
Succeeding in automotive investments requires accurately identifying the prevailing trend at each stage—a task demanding strategic insight comparable to that of a chief strategy officer at an automaker, which is highly difficult.
What alternatives exist? Diversification remains key. One approach is investing in core component suppliers, effectively gaining exposure to a basket of leading automakers. Another is opting for ETFs, such as the Huabao Auto ETF, which holds significant positions in XPeng, Byd Company Limited, Geely, and Li Auto. This ETF has risen over 10% amid the recent surge in overseas sales, demonstrating considerable elasticity.
Finally, beyond investment considerations, discussions about automakers always spark lively reader engagement—a welcome exchange, since vehicles are ultimately meant for consumers, and every perspective matters.
Comments