Refuting the "Peak China Economy" Narrative

Deep News04-04

Following the recent announcement of China's new annual economic growth targets, skeptical narratives from Western commentators have resurfaced. The latest iteration of this rhetoric is the "Peak China Economy" theory. In 2025, China's total economic output surpassed the 140 trillion yuan milestone for the first time, achieving steady growth on a high base, a fact witnessed by the world. At this very moment, pessimists are spreading negative sentiment in an attempt to undermine public confidence in China's economic prospects, with intentions that are all too clear.

What "peak" is being referred to? Is it the scale of the economy, the growth rate, the quality of development, or the drivers of growth? An objective analysis reveals that the claim of "Peak China" is inconsistent with the facts, regardless of the metric considered.

First, consider scale and speed. After the release of 2025 economic data, some Western media outlets highlighted the widening gap in nominal GDP between China and the United States. However, the reality is that nominal GDP calculations do not account for factors like inflation. When measured by purchasing power parity (PPP), which considers price level differences between countries, estimates from institutions like the International Monetary Fund indicate that China's GDP already leads the world. For many years, China has been the largest contributor to global economic growth. As the economic base expands, a 5% growth rate now corresponds to an economic increment of over 5 trillion yuan, equivalent to the annual GDP of a medium-sized country. It is true that after decades of rapid expansion, China's growth rate has moderated in recent years. Yet, this moderation is a deliberate and scientific adjustment made to promote high-quality development and facilitate economic transformation and upgrading, aligning with the common trajectory of modern national economic development. Basing a judgment of a nation's economy solely on short-term fluctuations of a single indicator leads to misinterpretation.

Second, consider quality and efficiency. Doubts about the substance of China's development generally fall into three categories. The first is the belief that China lacks growth momentum. This view only focuses on challenges faced by some traditional industries during transformation, while ignoring how emerging industries, new business forms, and new models are reshaping economic drivers. China is continuously increasing its research and development investment, and the growth of new动能 is now unstoppable. In 2025, the output of 3D printing equipment, industrial robots, and new energy vehicles increased by 52.5%, 28.0%, and 25.1% respectively. Meanwhile, some traditional industries are accelerating their climb up the global value chain, becoming important engines for cultivating new drivers and advantages. A prominent British consultancy firm noted that "this is the first time in history an emerging economy is at the forefront of technology." When assessing a country's growth momentum, total factor productivity (TFP) is a crucial indicator. For nations that have largely completed industrialization, sustained TFP growth is key to overcoming the middle-income trap and joining the ranks of high-income countries. In October of last year, the authoritative Penn World Table database revised China's TFP data for 2009-2023 to show an overall increase, with an average annual growth rate of approximately 2.1%. This significant data correction undermines claims that China's productivity has stagnated and affirms technological advancement as a critical driver of China's economic growth.

The second doubt concerns the supposed disappearance of China's demographic dividend. This narrative wrongly attributes the growth moderation to population aging, failing to recognize the ongoing transition from a "demographic dividend" to a "talent dividend." A demographic turning point does not equate to an economic turning point; population size is not the primary factor determining a country's development trajectory. Transforming a human resource advantage into a talent advantage can offset losses associated with an aging population. For economic development, effective labor—the product of labor force size and educational attainment—is more important than the sheer number of workers. China's transformation in this area is particularly notable. In terms of quantity, China's labor force stands at approximately 968 million, ranking among the largest globally. Regarding quality, the average years of education for China's population aged 16-59 reached 11.3 years in 2025. Considering the average education levels of both new entrants to the labor market and retirees, effective labor is still increasing. This vast talent pool increases China's potential for generating disruptive technologies. The emergence of applications like DeepSeek also indicates that China's "engineer dividend" is beginning to yield returns. China produces over 5 million graduates in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics annually, possessing the world's largest total talent pool and number of R&D personnel, laying a solid foundation for technological innovation.

The third doubt suggests limited staying power in China's domestic demand. This view claims that policy support is insufficient, leading to sluggish consumption growth, while completely overlooking the vibrant dynamics of the Chinese consumer market. The issue is not a lack of policy "strength," but a misunderstanding of the logic behind China's policy formulation. Flood-like stimulus and excessive intervention are not China's chosen policy direction. A review of this year's Government Work Report reveals practical measures designed to fundamentally boost consumption, such as "implementing plans to increase urban and rural residents' incomes" and "removing unreasonable restrictions in the consumption sector." Although consumption is a slower-moving variable, service consumption in areas like culture, sports, leisure, and transportation in China achieved double-digit growth in 2025. International experience shows that developed countries universally undergo a U-shaped transition during later industrialization stages, characterized by a decline in the investment rate and a rise in the consumption rate. China is currently in this process, with its consumption structure shifting from subsistence and goods-based towards development and service-oriented. The rising vitality in daily life reflects new consumption trends in China. Breakout successes like the "Su Chao" league, the global popularity of LABUBU, the Hanfu craze, and sold-out performances are individual highlights of consumption, akin to new sprouts breaking ground, containing immense potential to drive China's long-term prosperity and poised for continued robust growth.

China has progressed from a state of poverty to its current standing, overcoming numerous challenges along the way. It did not collapse in the past due to "China collapse" theories, and it will not peak now because of "Peak China" narratives. Looking ahead, the Chinese economy possesses substantial advantages and potential. A population of over 1.4 billion creates a massive demand market, more than 200 million skilled workers offer a unique dividend, and a complete industrial and supply chain system serves as a global testing ground for new technologies. Coupled with continuous reforms and unwavering openness, these factors will unleash a continuous stream of potential. "Repeat after me: Never underestimate China"—this was termed the "most important lesson of 2025" in an article by Bloomberg News. On this point, the Chinese people are even more confident.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment