A senior investment manager from Pacific Investment Management Co. (Pimco), a global giant in the fixed income market, has indicated that bond investors will be closely monitoring next week's Federal Reserve policy meeting and all comments from Chairman Kevin Warsh in his press conference. They are seeking clues about how quickly the new Fed Chair will imprint his own style on the central bank.
Pimco believes that Warsh will alter the Fed's method of signaling and communicating with the market, but not silence it. The shift is likely to be from the Powell era's model of relatively high transparency and strong forward guidance to a mode featuring shorter statements, fewer commitments, less reliance on the dot plot, and greater emphasis on policy flexibility.
Former Fed Vice Chair and Pimco global economic advisor Richard Clarida stated that investors are still trying to gauge how Warsh will handle the Fed's communication mechanism with the market. If Warsh's "path of change" at the Fed firmly removes the interest rate dot plot and forward guidance, the direct implication for financial markets is clear: investors can no longer overly rely on the Fed to use clear language to "anchor expectations." Instead, they must increasingly price assets based on factors like inflation, employment, oil prices, fiscal supply, term premiums, and the balance sheet path themselves.
As communication between the Warsh-led Fed and the market becomes increasingly ambiguous, it is highly likely to intensify market speculation about Fed rate hike expectations. This could even significantly raise term premiums, thereby strengthening the upward momentum for the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield, often called the "anchor for global asset pricing."
If the Warsh-led Fed does indeed remove the dot plot framework and forward guidance as anticipated, if strong jobs data continues to push up rate hike probabilities, and if international oil prices remain at historically high levels due to the continued blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, then a key driver of the recent global stock market bull run—the AI super-bull market—would undoubtedly face significant short-term setbacks under pressure from this "global pricing anchor." Particularly vulnerable would be those hot AI tech stocks within the AI computing infrastructure chain that carry the highest valuations and the largest amounts of leveraged capital.
Pimco Decodes the Warsh-led Fed: Dot Plot Fate Uncertain, Elevated Stock and Bond Volatility Could Become the New Norm
Clarida, speaking at a Pimco media summit in New York on Thursday, noted, "Looking back to the 1980s, it's understandable that when a new Fed Chair takes office, there is a period—perhaps weeks or months—where you try to understand the institution and its market communication style."
"For me, the real question is to what extent and in what way Warsh will put his own stamp and emphasis on this communication mode," he added. The new Fed Chair, who lobbied extensively to succeed Jerome Powell, has advocated for a return to a less transparent, more ambiguous mode of monetary policy.
During his April confirmation hearing before the U.S. Senate, Warsh stated, "Unlike many of my past and present Fed colleagues, I do not believe in forward guidance on interest rates and economic data."
Bond investors are weighing potential changes, including shorter Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) policy statements, the elimination of the dot plot, and a reduced frequency of press conferences by the Chair. However, if the Fed provides less economic or interest rate guidance, its actions become less predictable, and internal debates intensify leading to more frequent dissents among policymakers, investors would face stock and bond markets with higher volatility.
Daniel Ivascyn, Pimco's Chief Investment Officer, stated in a recent interview, "From a marginal perspective, less communication could create greater volatility and uncertainty, which might, in turn, offer more potential returns through active management."
"The Warsh-led Fed will maintain sufficient independence in areas the market cares most about, primarily interest rate and balance sheet policy," he added.
As the chart shows, market predictions for the Fed's policy path indicate that swap curve pricing implies more policy tightening than the Fed's official dot plot forecasts. Note: Forecasts are based on overnight index swaps corresponding to Fed meeting dates.
Pricing data from the interest rate swap market shows traders are still fully pricing in a 100% probability of the Fed resuming rate hikes in December, largely in line with the hawkish bets of bond market traders. The CME FedWatch Tool similarly shows traders unanimously betting on a December rate hike resumption, with some also betting on a hike as soon as October.
The short-term interest rate dot plot was introduced by former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke in 2012 to help guide investors in correctly pricing the Fed's policy path during the post-financial crisis era of ultra-low rates.
Ivascyn noted that when the federal funds rate was at low levels, "forward guidance was quite important," adding, "So now, with the federal funds rate at its current higher level, from a market perspective, its importance is lower."
"When we look at the dot plot, we discuss it constantly, and it's interesting to discuss, but you have to discount those dots heavily. First, they are individual views, and there's also the major concept of uncertainty—things keep changing," he said.
Ivascyn emphasized that after the outbreak of a new Middle East war in late February, the bond market swiftly shifted from pricing in rate cuts to expecting hikes. He stated, "It didn't require the Fed saying anything, nor any official wording adjustments, for the 2-year Treasury to be sold off continuously," "and for the yield to rise from about 3.4% in February toward a seemingly distant 4.20%."
Ivascyn warned that efforts to lower short-term rates during periods of high uncertainty for the global economy and inflation could backfire on the Fed.
David Kelly, Chief Global Strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management, said in a media interview on Wednesday, "Seeing a '4' handle certainly doesn't look good, and there's clearly no reason to ease policy right now, but I think the Fed can stand pat."
With "inflation basically at the target level for unemployment," Warsh may have no intention of "leading the charge on the rate cuts Trump is eager for."
"People have realized that cutting short-term rates now doesn't necessarily mean the very important 5-year or 10-year Treasury yield curve will move in the same direction," Ivascyn added. "If the Fed chooses to restart rate cuts during this uncertain period, yields further out the curve could very well move in the opposite direction, which we believe would be counterproductive."
Ivascyn stated that Pimco will wait to observe important signals on how the Warsh-led Fed might seek to reduce the size of the central bank's balance sheet, which currently stands at about $6.7 trillion, down from a peak of around $9 trillion in 2022. Warsh has repeatedly linked a smaller balance sheet to the possibility of rate cuts.
Ivascyn added, "The balance sheet component is something we are paying quite a bit of attention to, as it could have a significant impact on the shape of the yield curve and the performance of bonds across different maturities."
"It is more important than the communication aspect or things related to forward guidance."
If the Dot Plot Exits, Will the "Global Pricing Anchor" Go Wild?
The Warsh-led Fed may not choose complete "silence," but it is likely to shift from the Powell era's model of high transparency and strong forward guidance to a mode with shorter statements, fewer commitments, less reliance on the dot plot, and greater emphasis on policy flexibility.
The most direct implication for financial markets is that investors can no longer overly rely on the Fed to use clear language to "anchor expectations." Instead, they must increasingly price assets based on inflation, employment, oil prices, fiscal supply, potential term premiums, and the balance sheet path themselves.
However, the reform agenda Warsh is planning involves the Fed's inflation analysis framework, balance sheet guidance, and market communication mechanisms and strategies. These changes will be technical and cultural reshaping, unlikely to be completed overnight.
A Brookings survey also shows that only about 56% of Fed watchers believe they have a clear or generally clear understanding of the Fed's reaction function, lower than in previous surveys. This indicates that even under the current regime, the market's grasp of the Fed's policy response function has already declined.
For the 10-year U.S. Treasury, the "anchor for global asset pricing," the most important impact is not necessarily that short-term policy rates will rise, but that the volatility and term premiums for long-term rates may increase.
Pimco's Ivascyn emphasized that if the Fed attempts to suppress short-term rates during a period of high uncertainty for inflation and the global economy, the 5-year or 10-year Treasury yield curve may not move downward in tandem. It could even rise in the opposite direction due to market concerns about runaway inflation, damaged policy credibility, and fiscal supply pressures.
In the Warsh era, less communication and less forward guidance does not equate to lower interest rates. Instead, it may mean the bond market itself demands higher risk compensation and term premiums.
Analysts at Charles Schwab also pointed out that the Iran conflict, rising oil prices, and inflation expectations have already altered market expectations for Fed policy and pushed up Treasury yields. If oil prices remain high or inflation expectations continue to rise, the 10-year Treasury yield could break above the short-term upper bound of 4.5%.
Pimco believes that the path of balance sheet reduction could have a more significant impact on the shape of the yield curve and the performance of bonds across different maturities than forward guidance itself. Pimco has previously noted that the Fed's balance sheet has already shrunk by over $2 trillion from its near $9 trillion peak. If the reduction continues in a gradual, predictable manner, the impact on broader financial markets may be relatively limited.
However, an interpretation of Warsh's remarks by Brown Brothers Harriman suggests he favors compressing the Fed's roughly $6.7 trillion balance sheet to create room for rate cuts. The issue is that balance sheet reduction decreases system liquidity and alters demand for bank reserves and Treasury maturity structures. If mishandled, it could raise term premiums.
Therefore, for the 10-year Treasury, the key focus in the future is not whether the Fed holds fewer press conferences, but whether there is a confluence of four factors: "the pace of balance sheet reduction, Treasury supply, rising inflation expectations after the removal of the dot plot and forward guidance, and oil price shocks."
For the global bull market driven by the AI computing power frenzy, the underlying logic of surging AI demand has not been negated. However, the valuation system—how much investors are "willing to pay for future years of computing power cash flows"—will be re-evaluated by the market.
If the Warsh-led Fed reduces forward guidance, bond market volatility rises, and the 10-year yield remains stuck above 4.5% or expands further, then AI-related hot tech stocks with high P/E ratios, high leverage, a high proportion of distant cash flows, and free cash flow realization far in the future will face greater valuation compression pressure.
The 10-year Treasury yield serves as the risk-free rate anchor in the denominator of the DCF stock valuation model. If it remains persistently elevated, the AI super-bull market will not necessarily end, but it will face short-term downward correction pressure and may further shift from a "valuation expansion-led bull market" to an "earnings verification-led bull market."
Rising 10-year Treasury yields tend to significantly compress the valuation systems of long-duration assets like high-PE semiconductors, AI software, unprofitable AI infrastructure, power/fuel cells, quantum computing, and space tech. However, for leading AI hardware assets that already have locked-in orders, pricing power, buyback capabilities, and cash flows, the impact is more likely to manifest as periodic volatility rather than a collapse in the underlying industry logic.
For global hot AI tech stocks, cryptocurrencies, and other risk assets, the key threshold is roughly in the 4.5%–4.8% range for the 10-year Treasury yield. Technical analysis data suggests that if the 10-year yield breaks above the 4.70%–4.80% zone, it could reconfirm an upward trend in yields. When the risk-free rate indicator continues to rise, the equity risk premium gets compressed, significantly limiting the room for stock market valuation expansion.
This means that as long as the 10-year yield stays around 4.5%, the market can rely on the AI profit upgrade cycle driven by the infrastructure construction boom and risk appetite support. But if the yield effectively breaks above 4.70%–4.80% or even approaches 5%, those high-valuation tech assets/hot AI stocks that have been driving global markets toward a bull run will face stronger discount rate shocks.
Comments