Berkshire defends $8 bln Texas power proposal to combat blackouts

Reuters2021-05-02

By Jonathan Stempel

May 1 (Reuters) - Berkshire Hathaway Inc on Saturday defended its $8 billion proposal to build natural gas plants in Texas to help reduce the threat of devastating blackouts such as those in February.

"When you look at the power sector (in Texas), it fundamentally let the citizens down," Greg Abel, a Berkshire vice chairman and previously chief executive of Berkshire Hathaway Energy, said at the conglomerate's annual shareholder meeting.

"We've gone to Texas with what we believe is a good solution," he added. "The health and welfare of Texas was at risk, and we needed to effectively have an insurance policy in place for them."

Berkshire in March proposed building 10 natural gas-powered plants that would supplement the capacity of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), which provides electricity to most of the state, and provide backup power in emergencies.

But the proposal reportedly contemplates guaranteed payments to Berkshire, upsetting the deregulated pricing model for Texas' power market.

The Dallas Morning News said Berkshire is proposing a guaranteed 9.3% rate of return. Berkshire has declined to comment.

Starwood Energy Group, the investment firm, last month proposed its own competing $8 billion plan to build 11 natural gas pants in Texas.

Texas suffered widespread power outages in February because of a fierce winter storm and plunging temperatures.

Electricity prices soared, with some ordinary customers receiving exponentially larger monthly bills, and about 4.5 million Texans were left without power for several days.

Berkshire Chairman Warren Buffett added that Texas "is a terrific place to do business."

Abel downplayed a reported proposal by Elon Musk, who runs electric car maker Tesla Inc , to build a giant battery that could plug into Texas' power grid and power thousands of homes during hot summers.

He said Berkshire's plan could help stricken homes and businesses for several days, not merely hours like a battery.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

((jon.stempel@thomsonreuters.com; +1 646 223 6317; Reuters Messaging: jon.stempel.thomsonreuters.com@reuters.net))

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

  • SandDust
    2021-05-03
    SandDust
    Natural gas is much cleaner and will stay while world in transitioning to new energy. 
  • Alfred1007
    2021-05-02
    Alfred1007
    Traditional way of power supply is still needed, while transitioning into clean energy..
  • ZEROHERO
    2021-05-02
    ZEROHERO
    Natural gas vs Solar power. Warren Buffett vs Elon Musk.
    • pandajojo
      In time of time,  musk is the future,  King of tech... Comment n like
    • sgric
      solar for sustainability and the future
    • HoSayBo
      old school vs the future? time will tell
  • EthanShawn
    2021-05-02
    EthanShawn
    For sharing
  • JQing
    2021-05-02
    JQing
    Wow
  • Elaine0223
    2021-05-02
    Elaine0223
    ???
Leave a comment
9