AUSF: Interesting Multi-Factor Strategy, But Hardly Compelling Returns

seekingalpha03-19

Passively managed AUSF has a multi-factor equity strategy revolving around value, momentum, and low volatility that has not translated into consistent outperformance in the past.The ETF currently has ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2420771253?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"https://static.seekingalpha.com/cdn/s3/uploads/getty_images/626194278/image_626194278.jpg","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2024-03-19 08:14","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","id":"2420771253","market":"hk","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"AUSF: Interesting Multi-Factor Strategy, But Hardly Compelling Returns","media":"seekingalpha","content":"<div>\n<p>Passively managed AUSF has a multi-factor equity strategy revolving around value, momentum, and low volatility that has not translated into consistent outperformance in the past.The ETF currently has ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4679002-ausf-global-x-adaptive-us-etf-multi-factor-strategy-hardly-compelling-returns\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"seekingalpha","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AUSF: Interesting Multi-Factor Strategy, But Hardly Compelling Returns</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAUSF: Interesting Multi-Factor Strategy, But Hardly Compelling Returns\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2024-03-19 08:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4679002-ausf-global-x-adaptive-us-etf-multi-factor-strategy-hardly-compelling-returns><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Passively managed AUSF has a multi-factor equity strategy revolving around value, momentum, and low volatility that has not translated into consistent outperformance in the past.The ETF currently has ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4679002-ausf-global-x-adaptive-us-etf-multi-factor-strategy-hardly-compelling-returns\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"LU0238689110.USD","symbol_name":"贝莱德环球动力股票基金","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4679002-ausf-global-x-adaptive-us-etf-multi-factor-strategy-hardly-compelling-returns","article_id":"2420771253","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":["https://static.seekingalpha.com/cdn/s3/uploads/getty_images/626194278/image_626194278.jpg"],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2420771253","pubTimestamp":1710807272,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"seekingalpha","name":"Seeking Alpha"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"According to the Global X website, the ETF is managed passively, with the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index being the foundation of its strategy. The factsheet says that the index: ... is designed to dynamically allocate across three sub-indices that provide exposure to U.S. equities that exhibit characteristics of one of three primary factors: value, momentum and low volatility. Each factor is represented by a subindex that is derived from the Solactive U.S. Large & Mid Cap Index, which is designed to measure the 1,000 largest companies, by free float market capitalization, that are exchange-listed in the United States.  The following details on the rebalancing can be found in the summary prospectus: The Underlying Index is rebalanced quarterly. At each rebalance, the Underlying Index allocates weight to the three sub-indices based on the relative performance of each sub-index since the last rebalance of the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is designed to always be fu","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"seekingalpha.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"LU0238689110.USD":"贝莱德环球动力股票基金","BK4504":"桥水持仓","IE0009356076.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION \"A2\" (USD) ACC","DYNF":"BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF","IE00B1BXHZ80.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Appreciation A Acc USD","IE00BZ1G4Q59.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE US EQUITY SUSTAINABILITY LEADER \"A\"(USD) INC (A)","IE00BFSS8Q28.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc SGD-H","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","OMFL":"Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF","LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","IE00BJTD4N35.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Long Short Equity A1  Acc SGD-H","IE00B7KXQ091.USD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc USD","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","LU0348723411.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL HI-TECH GROWTH \"A\" (USD) INC","IE00BLSP4239.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Tactical Dividend Income A Mdis USD Plus","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","IE00BLSP4452.SGD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Tactical Dividend Income A Mdis SGD-H Plus","AAPL":"苹果","IE00BFSS7M15.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Acc SGD-H","LU0308772762.SGD":"Blackrock Global Allocation A2 SGD-H","LU0072462426.USD":"贝莱德全球配置 A2","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","FDN":"First Trust Dow Jones Internet I","LU0109391861.USD":"富兰克林美国机遇基金A Acc","IE00B3S45H60.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Multicap Opportunities A Acc SGD-H","LU0234570918.USD":"高盛全球核心股票组合Acc Close","IE00B19Z9505.USD":"美盛-美国大盘成长股A Acc","IE0004445239.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON US FORTY \"A2\" (USD) ACC","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","IE00BJJMRX11.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Acc SGD","LU0417517546.SGD":"Allianz US Equity Cl AT Acc SGD","LU0053666078.USD":"摩根大通基金-美国股票A（离岸）美元","IVV.AU":"ISHARES S&P 500 ETF/AUS","LU0082616367.USD":"摩根大通美国科技A（dist）","IE00BWXC8680.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5\" (SGD) ACC","IE00B1XK9C88.USD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0080751232.USD":"富达环球多元动力基金A","LU0353189680.USD":"富国美国全盘成长基金Cl A Acc","BK4527":"明星科技股","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","IE00BKDWB100.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5H\" (SGDHDG) ACC","IE00BBT3K403.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE TACTICAL DIVIDEND INCOME \"A(USD) ACC","LU0234572021.USD":"高盛美国核心股票组合Acc","IE00BSNM7G36.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0353189763.USD":"ALLSPRING  US ALL CAP GROWTH FUND \"I\" (USD) ACC","AUSF":"Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF","BK4573":"虚拟现实","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓"},"translate_title":"AUSF：有趣的多因素策略，但几乎没有令人信服的回报","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"AUSF":1,"OMFL":1,"IVV.AU":1,"IVV":1,"DYNF":1,"AAPL":1,"FDN":0.9},"content_text":"Passively managed AUSF has a multi-factor equity strategy revolving around value, momentum, and low volatility that has not translated into consistent outperformance in the past.The ETF currently has a tilt toward less expensive, less volatile stocks with unappealing growth characteristics.The paradox is that AUSF emerged from the 2022 bear market almost unscathed, but still delivered the worst maximum drawdown in the ETF group discussed in the article.As I see little justification for a Buy rating assuming questionable performance, yet there are not enough arguments for a Sell rating either, the golden mean of a Hold rating is to be chosen.   bgsmith My dear long-term readers certainly remember that I pay special attention to multi-factor equity exchange-traded funds. Today, I would like to assess yet another such vehicle, the Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (NYSEARCA:AUSF). I initiate coverage with a Hold rating, as I am frankly unimpressed by its total returns. I believe its inability to beat the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) consistently in the past was most likely the consequence of the backward-looking approach of its underlying index. It did not fully protect it from steep drawdowns amid sell-offs as well. Besides, I was surprised by the fact that AUSF currently has more of a contrarian tilt as it almost entirely ignores the Magnificent Seven group and more growthier stocks, favoring less expensive, less volatile names. My opinion is that AUSF does not have an edge over the macro-focused Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL), which I rated a Buy twice, with the most recent article presented in February. AUSF is not ahead of the actively managed BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) either, a fund I have a Hold rating on. I would like to discuss all that in greater depth below in the note. How does AUSF manage the portfolio? According to the Global X website, the ETF is managed passively, with the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index being the foundation of its strategy. The factsheet says that the index: ... is designed to dynamically allocate across three sub-indices that provide exposure to U.S. equities that exhibit characteristics of one of three primary factors: value, momentum and low volatility. Each factor is represented by a subindex that is derived from the Solactive U.S. Large & Mid Cap Index, which is designed to measure the 1,000 largest companies, by free float market capitalization, that are exchange-listed in the United States.  The following details on the rebalancing can be found in the summary prospectus: The Underlying Index is rebalanced quarterly. At each rebalance, the Underlying Index allocates weight to the three sub-indices based on the relative performance of each sub-index since the last rebalance of the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is designed to always be fully allocated to at least two of the three sub-indices described above. So in sum, this is a strategy that involves rotating in and out of value, momentum, and less volatile stocks quarterly, with the decision to overweight, underweight, or exclude the sub-indices based on their past returns, as we know from the index methodology summary. AUSF performance was unappealing in the past The critical reason for my skepticism is that AUSF's returns were generally unimpressive in the past. At least, beating IVV was a task close to unachievable for it, even though a few bright spots do exist. For example, it weathered the 2022 bear market almost totally unscathed, with just a 78 bps decline. However, while it did participate in both 2020 and 2023 bull parties, it was unable to eke out even a thinly stronger total return than IVV in both years. Moreover, in 2020, its worst month was March, as it underperformed the S&P 500 ETF by 10.7%, implying it was completely unprepared for the coronavirus sell-off. It showed some healthy dynamics in the months that followed, yet it still dismally trailed the bellwether ETF by 17.1% in the pandemic-torn year. So in sum, incepted in August 2018, the ETF beat IVV only in 2018 (by 2.4%) and 2022 (by 17.4%), with the annualized total return over the September 2018–February 2024 period being almost 1% lower. This is a significant disappointment for a multi-factor ETF that is supposed to tactically evolve to 'adapt' to the prevailing market narrative, ditching losers and boosting allocation to winners. Yet this is just the tip of the iceberg. While AUSF looks somewhat bleak compared to IVV, its returns look even weaker when juxtaposed to OMFL's.    Portfolio AUSF IVV OMFL   Initial Balance $10,000 $10,000 $10,000   Final Balance $18,351 $19,237 $19,901   CAGR 11.67% 12.63% 13.33%   Stdev 19.64% 18.58% 20.20%   Best Year 27.45% 31.25% 35.58%   Worst Year -10.63% -18.16% -13.97%   Max. Drawdown -31.57% -23.93% -22.11%   Sharpe Ratio 0.56 0.63 0.62   Sortino Ratio 0.82 0.95 1.04   Market Correlation 0.9 1 0.92   Click to enlarge Data from Portfolio Visualizer. The period is September 2018–February 2024 And over the April 2019–February 2024 period (DYNF was incepted in March 2019), AUSF was also unable to beat either the selected peers or IVV.    Portfolio AUSF DYNF IVV OMFL   Initial Balance $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000   Final Balance $18,538 $19,199 $19,470 $19,492   CAGR 13.38% 14.19% 14.51% 14.54%   Stdev 19.76% 18.63% 18.49% 20.39%   Best Year 27.45% 36.26% 28.76% 28.96%   Worst Year -0.78% -20.27% -18.16% -13.97%   Max. Drawdown -31.57% -25.91% -23.93% -22.11%   Sharpe Ratio 0.64 0.7 0.72 0.67   Sortino Ratio 0.94 1.09 1.12 1.16   Market Correlation 0.89 0.99 1 0.92   Click to enlarge Data from Portfolio Visualizer What is AUSF's current factor mix? After dissecting the ETF's 192-strong portfolio as of March 15, I can conclude that AUSF is currently representing a contrarian bet as it is light in growth stocks, with a relatively small footprint in mega-caps (28.3%), and has just one trillion-dollar league member in the basket, Apple (AAPL), with a microscopic weight of 6 bps. The overweening majority of holdings have beta coefficients below 1, as if the ETF is preparing for a sharp market correction. And perhaps the most interesting part here is how its factor mix has changed since December 2023. I have been following this vehicle since the end of 2023, so I have the necessary data. Let me share the following points:  My calculations show that its weighted-average market cap stood at roughly $95 billion as of March 16, which represents a meaningful decline from $159.5 billion as of December 28. This is explainable as the portfolio has seen a thorough overhaul, with the previous holdings now accounting for less than 49% of the net assets. The reason for such a significant change was the February rebalancing of the underlying index. What is surprising though is that both the earnings yield and the share of holdings with a B- Quant Valuation rating or higher have changed insignificantly: a 6.57% EY now vs. 7% previously and 36.6% vs. 36.8%. For a large-cap portfolio, this is fairly considerable, indicative of a value tilt. The reason for the EY being so high is that AUSF remains enamored of financials, with a 23.2% allocation vs. approximately 26% previously. To give a bit more color, the financial sector stocks have the median EY at 8.3%, which is the highest result in the AUSF portfolio, followed by energy with 7.4% and materials with 7.39%. While in December the portfolio made a more GARP-ish impression, it is no longer valid as its 'growth' ingredient has disappeared. More specifically, the weighted-average revenue growth rate has fallen to 3.6% from 9.4%, with one of the reasons being pundits expecting lower sales going forward from 17% of the holdings, as my calculations based on the data from Seeking Alpha illustrated. Strangely, there were more such stocks in the portfolio in December, 18.3%. So what was the actual reason for the decline then? There were changes in portfolio composition, which, I surmise, were driven by index rebalancing and, consequently, the ETF rotating toward less volatile stocks. Here, the facts speak for themselves. I have identified 18 companies (7.2% weight) that had a 20%+ revenue growth rate and a beta coefficient above 1 (the median of 1.3 for the group). They were all removed. So while over 11% of the holdings had an over 20% revenue growth rate as of December, that share shrank to 89 bps. The weighted-average EPS growth rate has declined as well, now at just 5.3% vs. 8.2%. The portfolio-wise 24-month and 60-month beta coefficients have fallen significantly, now at 0.79 and 0.92 vs. 1.11 and 1.22. In this regard, I hypothesize that this equity mix is calibrated for a correction, as low-beta stocks tend to fare better than their more volatile counterparts during sell-offs. Quality characteristics are mostly fine, as illustrated by the share of holdings with a B- Quant Profitability grade of B- or higher, which stands at 84.5% (86.8% previously). The downside here is that, mostly because of financials, a low-ROA sector, the weighted-average figure is only 6.5% (8.9% previously).  Investor takeaway In sum, passively managed AUSF has a multi-factor equity strategy that has not translated into consistent outperformance in the past. I find it fairly perplexing that AUSF emerged from the 2022 bear market almost unscathed but still delivered the worst maximum drawdown in the ETF group discussed above, as it was entirely unprepared for the pandemic sell-off.  While I am unimpressed by its results, which hardly justify a bullish thesis, I reckon there are not enough arguments for a Sell rating either, as AUSF's strategy, past returns, and current factor mix are not that bad. That is to say, the golden mean of a Hold rating is to be chosen.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":null,"is_publish_highlight":null,"is_publish_live":null,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.22.4","shortVersion":"4.22.4","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2420771253"}