Fitch Ratings Downgrades Outlook for Chinese State-Owned Banks

Dow Jones04-16
 

By Sherry Qin

 

Fitch Ratings has downgraded the outlook for six Chinese state-owned banks amid concerns about the government's ability to support the sector in the event of stress. The move comes after the rating agency cut its outlook for China's sovereign credit rating last week.

Fitch on Tuesday downgraded the outlook for the credit rating of six Chinese banks to negative from stable, including Industrial & Commercial Bank of China, China Construction Bank, Agricultural Bank of China, Bank of China, Bank of Communications and Postal Savings Bank of China.

Last week, the rating agency cut its outlook for China's long-term foreign debt to negative from stable, citing risks to China's public finances as the country faces more uncertainties "amid a transition away from property-reliant growth to what the government views as a more sustainable growth model."

Fitch said China's lower sovereign rating outlook indicates its reduced ability to "provide the same level of extraordinary support to these banks," although it reckons the government's propensity to support the state-owned banks remains intact.

 

Write to Sherry Qin at sherry.qin@wsj.com

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

April 16, 2024 04:45 ET (08:45 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment