Top Companies for Financial Strength -- Journal Report

Dow Jones04-17

Apple scored highest for financial strength among the latest Management Top 250 companies, followed by Microsoft and Alphabet.

The Management Top 250 ranking, compiled by researchers at the Drucker Institute, part of Claremont Graduate University, compares companies using the late management guru Peter Drucker's principles to identify the most effectively managed businesses. The five main components of the ranking are customer satisfaction, employee engagement and development, innovation, social responsibility and financial strength.

Apple ranks second overall, with Microsoft first and Alphabet fourth. Procter & Gamble, fourth for financial strength, also made the to 10 overall, at No. 7. P&G and Apple are among the Management Top 250 companies with the biggest gains from a year earlier in scores for financial strength.

Apple also made the top 10 for innovation and is one of seven All-Stars in the latest Management Top 250 ranking -- companies whose scores in all five components were in the top 20% for the nearly 800 companies that were analyzed for the ranking. Microsoft made the top 10 among the Management Top 250 for employee engagement and development, innovation and social responsibility.

Amazon, ninth for financial strength, has the top score for innovation, and Walmart, sixth for financial strength, also made the top 10 for innovation.

You can explore the full, detailed rankings here.

-- Gerard Yates

For questions or comments, contact Wall Street Journal reporter Tom Corrigan at tom.corrigan@wsj.com.

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

April 17, 2024 10:00 ET (14:00 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

1

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2428134955?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2024-04-17 22:00","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2428134955","market":"fut","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Top Companies for Financial Strength -- Journal Report","media":"Dow Jones","content":"<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\n     Apple scored highest for financial strength among the latest Management Top 250 companies, followed by Microsoft and Alphabet. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The Management Top 250 ranking, compiled by researchers at the Drucker Institute, part of Claremont Graduate University, compares companies using the late management guru  Peter Drucker's principles to identify the most effectively managed businesses. The five main components of the ranking are customer satisfaction, employee engagement and development, innovation, social responsibility and financial strength. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Apple ranks second overall, with Microsoft first and Alphabet fourth. Procter &amp; Gamble, fourth for financial strength, also made the to 10 overall, at No. 7. P&amp;G and Apple are among the Management Top 250 companies with the biggest gains from a year earlier in scores for financial strength. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Apple also made the top 10 for innovation and is one of seven All-Stars in the latest Management Top 250 ranking -- companies whose scores in all five components were in the top 20% for the nearly 800 companies that were analyzed for the ranking. Microsoft made the top 10 among the Management Top 250 for employee engagement and development, innovation and social responsibility. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Amazon, ninth for financial strength, has the top score for innovation, and Walmart, sixth for financial strength, also made the top 10 for innovation. \n</p>\n<p>\n     You can explore the full, detailed rankings  here. \n</p>\n<p>\n     -- Gerard Yates \n</p>\n<p>\n     For questions or comments, contact Wall Street Journal reporter  Tom Corrigan at  tom.corrigan@wsj.com. \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  April 17, 2024 10:00 ET (14:00 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2024 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Top Companies for Financial Strength -- Journal Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTop Companies for Financial Strength -- Journal Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2024-04-17 22:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N><strong>Dow Jones</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple scored highest for financial strength among the latest Management Top 250 companies, followed by Microsoft and Alphabet. \n\n\n     The Management Top 250 ranking, compiled by researchers at the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"BK4155","symbol_name":"大卖场与超市","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","article_id":"2428134955","we_media_id":"106","thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2428134955","pubTimestamp":1713362400,"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":{"media_name":"Dow Jones","introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"summary":"Apple scored highest for financial strength among the latest Management Top 250 companies, followed by Microsoft and Alphabet.The Management Top 250 ranking, compiled by researchers at the Drucker Institute, part of Claremont Graduate University, compares companies using the late management guru  Peter Drucker's principles to identify the most effectively managed businesses. The five main components of the ranking are customer satisfaction, employee engagement and development, innovation, social responsibility and financial strength.Apple ranks second overall, with Microsoft first and Alphabet fourth. Procter & Gamble, fourth for financial strength, also made the to 10 overall, at No. 7. P&G and Apple are among the Management Top 250 companies with the biggest gains from a year earlier in scores for financial strength.Apple also made the top 10 for innovation and is one of seven All-Stars in the latest Management Top 250 ranking -- companies whose scores in all five components were in ","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"BK4155":"大卖场与超市","GOOGL":"谷歌A","SG9999014542.SGD":"United Income Focus Trust Acc SGD","BK4504":"桥水持仓","LU1585245621.USD":"EASTSPRING INV GLOBAL LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY FUND \"A\" (USD) ACC B","IE00BJTD4N35.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Long Short Equity A1  Acc SGD-H","IE0009356076.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU0965509101.SGD":"AB LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","GOOG":"谷歌","IE0034235188.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL FOCUS EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BLSP4452.SGD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Tactical Dividend Income A Mdis SGD-H Plus","BK4514":"搜索引擎","IE00B3S45H60.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Multicap Opportunities A Acc SGD-H","LU0109391861.USD":"富兰克林美国机遇基金A Acc","LU0238689110.USD":"贝莱德环球动力股票基金","IE0004445239.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON US FORTY \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU0072462426.USD":"贝莱德全球配置 A2","LU0052756011.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL BALANCED \"A\" (USD) INC","MSFT":"微软","LU2242646821.SGD":"Fidelity Global Dividend Plus A-MINCOME(G)-SGD","GB00B4QBRK32.GBP":"FUNDSMITH EQUITY \"R\" (GBP) INC","LU0237698245.USD":"富达环球地产基金A","GB00B4LPDJ14.GBP":"FUNDSMITH EQUITY \"R\" (GBP) ACC","LU0308772762.SGD":"Blackrock Global Allocation A2 SGD-H","LU1280957306.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) US CONTRARIAN CORE EQUITIES \"AUP\" (USD) INC","IE00BKDWB100.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5H\" (SGDHDG) ACC","IE00BSNM7G36.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1914381329.SGD":"Allianz Best Styles Global Equity Cl ET Acc H2-SGD","SG9999002232.USD":"Allianz Global High Payout USD","LU0128525689.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL BALANCED \"A\"(USD) ACC","LU1804176565.USD":"EASTSPRING INV GLOBAL GROWTH EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","SG9999002224.SGD":"Allianz Global High Payout SGD","LU0965509010.AUD":"AB LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (AUDHDG) INC","BK4220":"综合零售","WMT":"沃尔玛","PG":"宝洁","LU0061474705.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL DYNAMIC REAL RETURN \"AU\" (USD) ACC","AMZN":"亚马逊","LU1430594728.SGD":"Eastspring Investments - Global Low Volatility Equity AS SGD","LU0130102774.USD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity RA USD","BK4588":"碎股","LU0158827948.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY \"A\" (USD) INC","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","LU0289960550.SGD":"AB FCP I - GLOBAL EQUITY BLEND PORTFOLIO 'A' (SGD) ACC","LU0861579265.USD":"联博低波幅策略股票基金A","LU1691799644.USD":"Amundi Funds Polen Capital Global Growth A2 (C) USD","IE00B1BXHZ80.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Appreciation A Acc USD","LU0198837287.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - USA GROWTH \"P\" (USD) ACC","IE00BFSS8Q28.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc SGD-H","LU0130103400.USD":"Natixis Harris Associates Global Equity RA USD"},"translate_title":"财务实力最高的公司——期刊报告","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"WMT":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"PG":0.9,"MSFT":0.9,"GOOG":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9},"content_text":"Apple scored highest for financial strength among the latest Management Top 250 companies, followed by Microsoft and Alphabet. \n\n\n     The Management Top 250 ranking, compiled by researchers at the Drucker Institute, part of Claremont Graduate University, compares companies using the late management guru  Peter Drucker's principles to identify the most effectively managed businesses. The five main components of the ranking are customer satisfaction, employee engagement and development, innovation, social responsibility and financial strength. \n\n\n     Apple ranks second overall, with Microsoft first and Alphabet fourth. Procter & Gamble, fourth for financial strength, also made the to 10 overall, at No. 7. P&G and Apple are among the Management Top 250 companies with the biggest gains from a year earlier in scores for financial strength. \n\n\n     Apple also made the top 10 for innovation and is one of seven All-Stars in the latest Management Top 250 ranking -- companies whose scores in all five components were in the top 20% for the nearly 800 companies that were analyzed for the ranking. Microsoft made the top 10 among the Management Top 250 for employee engagement and development, innovation and social responsibility. \n\n\n     Amazon, ninth for financial strength, has the top score for innovation, and Walmart, sixth for financial strength, also made the top 10 for innovation. \n\n\n     You can explore the full, detailed rankings  here. \n\n\n     -- Gerard Yates \n\n\n     For questions or comments, contact Wall Street Journal reporter  Tom Corrigan at  tom.corrigan@wsj.com. \n\n\n \n\n\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n  April 17, 2024 10:00 ET (14:00 GMT)\n\n\n  Copyright (c) 2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":null,"is_publish_highlight":null,"is_publish_live":null,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.22.4","shortVersion":"4.22.4","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2428134955"}