How to avoid concentration risk when investing

Small Caps05-17

Concentration risk. It is something that all investors, large and small, have to wrestle with as they try to get exposure to share markets in the most diversified and cost-effective way. The ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2436875739?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"https://cdn.shortpixel.ai/client/w_868,q_lossy,to_auto,ret_wait/https://150309019.v2.pressablecdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Concentration-risk-investing.jpg","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2024-05-17 05:05","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2436875739","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"How to avoid concentration risk when investing","media":"Small Caps","content":"<div>\n<p>Concentration risk.\nIt is something that all investors, large and small, have to wrestle with as they try to get exposure to share markets in the most diversified and cost-effective way.\nThe ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://smallcaps.com.au/how-to-avoid-concentration-risk-when-investing/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"smallcap_stock","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How to avoid concentration risk when investing</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow to avoid concentration risk when investing\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2024-05-17 05:05 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://smallcaps.com.au/how-to-avoid-concentration-risk-when-investing/><strong>Small Caps</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Concentration risk.\nIt is something that all investors, large and small, have to wrestle with as they try to get exposure to share markets in the most diversified and cost-effective way.\nThe ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://smallcaps.com.au/how-to-avoid-concentration-risk-when-investing/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"SH","symbol_name":"标普500反向ETF","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://smallcaps.com.au/how-to-avoid-concentration-risk-when-investing/","article_id":"2436875739","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":["https://cdn.shortpixel.ai/client/w_868,q_lossy,to_auto,ret_wait/https://150309019.v2.pressablecdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Concentration-risk-investing.jpg"],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2436875739","pubTimestamp":1715893506,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"smallcap_stock","name":"Small Caps"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"It is something that all investors, large and small, have to wrestle with as they try to get exposure to share markets in the most diversified and cost-effective way.The Australian share market is one of the world’s great examples of concentration risk, with the dominance of the financials and materials industries carrying much more weight when you are exposed to the ASX 200 index through an exchange traded fund  such as those from Betashares , BlackRock  or SPDR .When you look at the ASX 200, the big banks and miners dominate the weightings, making up more than half of the market index.That can be great at some times but can also lead to your investments lagging significantly should one or both of these major sectors hit tough times.Historically, Australia was a bit of an outlier with such a significant concentration risk but recent moves in the global large cap space have seen the concentration risk spread to other stock exchanges, even the once highly diversified S&P 500 in the Unit","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"smallcaps.com.au","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"SH":"标普500反向ETF","XKO.AU":"标普/澳交所 300指数","OEX":"标普100","STW.AU":"SPDR® S&P/ASX 200 ETF","VOO":"Vanguard标普500ETF","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","XJO.AU":"标普/澳交所 200指数","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","XAO.AU":"标普/澳交所 普通股指数","ETF.AU":"UBS IQ Research Preferred AU Share","SPY":"标普500ETF","FDN":"First Trust Dow Jones Internet I","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","BK4588":"碎股","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","QUS.AU":"BETASHARES S&P 500 EQ WT ETF","MVW.AU":"VANECK AUSTRALIAN EQUAL WEIG",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","A200.AU":"BetaShares Australia 200","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓","IOZ.AU":"iShares Core S&P/ASX 200","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF"},"translate_title":"投资时如何规避集中风险","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"A200.AU":1,"STW.AU":1,"QUS.AU":1,"MVW.AU":1,"IOZ.AU":1,"ETF.AU":1,"VOO":0.9,"SPY":0.9,"XKO.AU":0.76,"XJO.AU":0.76,"XAO.AU":0.76,"FDN":0.76,"UPRO":0.6,".SPX":0.6,"SSO":0.6,"SPXU":0.6,"SH":0.6,"SDS":0.6,"OEX":0.6,"OEF":0.6,"IVV":0.6,"ESmain":0.6},"content_text":"Concentration risk.\nIt is something that all investors, large and small, have to wrestle with as they try to get exposure to share markets in the most diversified and cost-effective way.\nThe Australian share market is one of the world’s great examples of concentration risk, with the dominance of the financials and materials industries carrying much more weight when you are exposed to the ASX 200 index through an exchange traded fund (ETF) such as those from Betashares (ASX: A200), BlackRock (ASX: IOZ) or SPDR (ASX: STW).\nBanks and miners dominate locally\nWhen you look at the ASX 200, the big banks and miners dominate the weightings, making up more than half of the market index.\nThat can be great at some times but can also lead to your investments lagging significantly should one or both of these major sectors hit tough times.\nHistorically, Australia was a bit of an outlier with such a significant concentration risk but recent moves in the global large cap space have seen the concentration risk spread to other stock exchanges, even the once highly diversified S&P 500 in the United States.\nMagnificent seven have produced concentration\nThe incredible boom in the US market by the so-called magnificent seven stocks (Meta, Microsoft, Tesla, Alphabet, Amazon, Nvidia and Apple) means that these massive companies now represent around 30% of the S&P 500 index.\nThat has led many investors to question whether it makes sense to simply remain heavily exposed to these large company stocks given their recent outperformance relative to the market.\nYou don’t have to go back too far to see that such a concentration risk is very real.\nWhile the magnificent seven delivered sizeable returns to investors in calendar year 2023, calendar year 2022 was quite different as they substantially underperformed the other companies in the S&P 500 index.\nAnnual returns diverge according to size\nLooking back even further over 30 years you can see that average annual returns have diverged quite dramatically when looking at large and small company shares, with small companies significantly outperforming large companies in the early 2000’s.\nWhat this shows is the risk of remaining too concentrated on a smaller number of shares, with a more diversified approach of being exposed to a range of different sectors that can produce a higher expected return over the long term with significantly less risk.\nThis is a lesson most direct investors already know well – if you own a small number of stocks you can easily miss out on some of the market performance which is being produced by some star performers that are not in your portfolio.\nThat is not to say that taking a concentrated approach is not a viable strategy – many of the world’s great investors run highly concentrated portfolios – but merely to point out the risk of unconsciously being more concentrated due to sector domination in indexes.\nCapturing all market sectors\nIt is also quite important to capture all segments of the market and not just the large companies, with the long-term average return for smaller company stocks higher than the average return of larger company stocks.\nThis is sometimes called component investing, using a strategic position in each component of the market such as large, medium and small company shares and then using rebalancing as the tool to take profits during periods of outperformance and topping up the unloved component when it is cheaper.\nAs you might expect, the flood of new ETF products has produced a number of answers to this concentration risk with some offering exposure to different sectors such as small companies or specific market sectors and others using what is called “equal weighting” to ensure that they mitigate against the concentration risks of market weighted index ETFs.\nEqual weight approach creates different results\nEqual-weighted ETFs don’t allocate larger companies a larger piece of the ETFs weighting, with all companies in the index, regardless of size, treated equally.\nShould a company grow its portion of the index, it will be actively sold down at a rebalancing date (usually quarterly) so that it still retains the same weight in the fund.\nThe same applies to a company that might fall a lot, with more of its shares being bought at a rebalancing date.\nUsually, these equal weight ETFs have higher management fees to deal with this amount of trading, which should be borne in mind when investing in them compared to vanilla index funds which tend to have very small fees.\nLocal and international examples\nOne of the local ETFs is the VanEck Vectors Australian Equal Weight ETF (ASX: MVW), which invests on criteria including having a market cap above US$150 million, meeting a liquidity requirement of a three-month average-daily-trading volume of at least US$1 million and at least 250,000 shares traded per month.\nAll of the qualifying companies are assigned an equal weight in the fund which is maintained over time – assuming the company still meets the liquidity and size filters.\nAnother example, this time locally listed but covering the US market, is the BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (ASX: QUS).\nAs you might expect, the results from such equally weighted ETFs are different from those obtained by an index exposure.\nDifferent results in different markets\nThe VanEck methodology would have consistently produced higher returns than the ASX 200 over the past five years while the BetaShares methodology would have underperformed the S&P 500 over the past five years.\nThat provides an interesting point of reference.\nFor the already concentrated Australian market, an equally weighted approach produced better returns but in the US market where a handful of shares were growing quickly to dramatically concentrate the index, a similar approach underperformed.\nShould the concentration of either index fall, you would probably expect both equal weight ETFs to do well, while further concentration might harm their chances.\nEither way, the equal weight approach is an interesting wrinkle that all investors searching for some true market diversification might want to consider.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":null,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.24.0","shortVersion":"4.24.0","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2436875739"}