AI and data centers are devouring energy resources - threatening U.S. security

Dow Jones05-23

MW AI and data centers are devouring energy resources - threatening U.S. security

By Duncan McNabb

Government must revamp energy policies to keep the nation's power grid running

We need more power, and we need it now.

Artificial intelligence has emerged as a transformational technology that will reshape our society and economy for the foreseeable future. We are only beginning to understand its implications, and the public debate has touched on topics ranging from political misinformation to the future of the workforce.

Missing from the current conversation are the risks to our national security if we fail to make the energy policy changes necessary to power these systems. Data centers and their rapacious thirst for energy has left some environmental advocates arguing to slow AI, or for taking a highly cautious approach.

Maintaining appropriate guardrails around AI is an essential conversation to have, but this dialogue must focus on "how" - not "if" - we find enough power for this technology and other critical national needs.

Even without AI, U.S. energy demand is surging for positive reasons: Reindustrialization through an advanced manufacturing renaissance, vehicle electrification and robust economic growth mean we need more power, and we need it now. After remaining flat for 30 years, national electricity demand is growing at double the forecasted rate, reaching 6% in certain areas of accelerated economic growth, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission anticipates 4.7% growth over the next five years.

The U.S. energy grid is buckling under the stress of recent demand increases.

After decades of offshoring manufacturing and allowing our competitors to undermine our industry through a race to the bottom, this reversal is worth celebrating - although we may be at just the beginning. AES $(AES)$, a Virginia-based utility, estimates that data centers could comprise up to 7.5% of total U.S. electricity consumption by 2030, roughly equivalent to 40 million households.

Read: AI could demand a shocking amount of electricity - check out this chart

We need a national strategy: the U.S. energy grid is buckling under the stress of recent demand increases, and challenges will increase as growth surges.

If we are not clear-eyed in our approach, the dynamics that undermined our industrial capacity could foreshadow our future with AI. Our geopolitical adversaries, especially Russia and China, have overwhelming market share in production of critical minerals, strategic industrial metals, and other manufacturing sectors - and they are accelerating technology development. China has been unambiguous on current and planned efforts to employ AI and machine learning to augment the capabilities of its weapons of war.

As a nation we must set the standard for responsible development of AI systems, but we cannot fall behind and risk bringing traditional munitions to an AI-weaponry fight. The Pentagon, in its 2023 Data, Analytics and Artificial Intelligence Adoption Strategy, argued that AI is a huge potential competitive advantage. We can revolutionize our defense strategy by providing faster, more accurate analyses, improving decision-making and enhancing overall operational effectiveness - while putting fewer of our servicemen and -women in harm's way. But only if we have the power to actualize it.

The Department of Defense is already the single largest user of electricity in the U.S. and accounts for 76% of the federal government's energy consumption. Defense and energy security have always been linked, and AI is another point of intersection where we must keep our national security interests as our North Star.

We have a menu of solutions - and we will have to take an all-of-the-above approach to tackle a challenge of this magnitude.

We must increase our capacity to generate more power while also building out and updating the transmission infrastructure - much of it aging and outdated - that brings energy to our communities. Wind, solar and other renewable-energy sources must be complemented with traditional generation.

After decades of stagnation, the conversation on nuclear power and small, modular nuclear reactors is shifting: Congress recently voted 365-36 in favor of the Atomic Energy Advancement Act. Nuclear must be part of the conversation on solutions.

Finally, we must continue the important work of decoupling the U.S. energy system supply chain from adversaries by onshoring and friend-shoring the essential components for our energy transition - and bolstering the security of our grid infrastructure at the state and federal level.

A reliable and secure power grid is the lifeblood of the American economy and vital to the defense of this country. We must treat the challenges facing this essential piece of infrastructure with the urgency they deserve. America's position as a force for democratic values in the world depends on it.

Gen. (Ret.) Duncan McNabb, former commander of U.S. Transportation Command, is a member of the Energy Security Leadership Council at energy security advocacy group SAFE.

Also read: Power demand from AI, EVs and Big Tech is now the energy sector's No. 1 concern

More: A 'liar's dividend': AI deepfakes are a powerful tool for criminals and political control

-Duncan McNabb

This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

May 22, 2024 16:56 ET (20:56 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment