BREAKINGVIEWS-A South Korean EV reversal would inspire copycats

Reuters06-27

(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.)

By Katrina Hamlin

HONG KONG, June 27 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Splitting out assets to capitalise on an electric-car boom was once a way to charge up valuations for brands from Renault to Geely. But South Korea's SK Group might go the other way and merge its loss-making battery unit with another division as part of a broader shakeup. As growth in the industry slows, standalone EV businesses face a tough slog.

South Korea's second-largest conglomerate is mulling a major overhaul of its sprawling empire that spans over 200 companies in chips, chemicals, hotels and more. One key question is what the conglomerate will do with its struggling battery business. Three years ago, the $8 billion SK Innovation , which operates the country's largest oil refiner, split out its batteries division into a standalone company, SK On. At the time, EV mania had taken over global markets: Tesla's stock rose nearly eightfold between the beginning of 2020 and September 2021 when SK investors approved the plan. One mooted idea as reported by local media is to combine SK On, which has made a cumulative operating loss of about $1.7 billion, with a financially stronger business such as the conglomerate's energy utility. SK Innovation has said it is considering different strategic measures including mergers to strengthen its competitiveness, but nothing has been decided. Any deal will be a wake-up call for global automakers and their suppliers. Renault separated EVs into its Ampere unit last year; China's Geely has listed multiple EV brands including Zeekr

, while compatriot Great Wall Motor spun out its battery arm SVOLT. In 2022, South Korea's LG spun out its battery unit, LG Energy Solution <>, in an $11 billion initial public offering; the stock, alongside local rival Samsung SDI's , is down by nearly a third since the debut.

As with SK On, those pure-play EV businesses now face an uncertain future as global demand in electric cars slow. Revenue at the South Korean battery-maker roughly halved year-on-year to 1.7 trillion won ($1.2 billion) in the first quarter of this year. Car companies including SK client Ford Motor have reconsidered or pushed back planned EV investments. Combining a stalling battery business into a larger entity won't solve a growth slowdown. But it might give executives more flexibility to shore up its finances, including by paying down debt. If SK makes a U-turn, it will be closely studied. Follow @KatrinaHamlin on X Follow @KatrinaHamlin on X

CONTEXT NEWS

South Korea's SK Group is preparing to hold a two-day strategy meeting beginning June 28 to discuss streamlining its business to focus on key areas including artificial intelligence, chips and batteries, Reuters reported on June 25. The meeting's agenda includes considering options from mergers to divestments, a source with direct knowledge of the matter told Reuters.

SK Innovation, the parent of South Korea’s largest oil refiner SK Energy and battery maker SK On, is looking to merge with energy affiliate SK E&S, The Korea Economic Daily reported on June 20, citing sources.

<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Battery stocks lose power

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^> (Editing by Robyn Mak and Aditya Srivastav) ((For previous columns by the author, Reuters customers can click on katrina.hamlin@thomsonreuters.com;))

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment