Markets Take A Hit, But A Clear Risk-Off Signal Is Still In Dispute

seekingalpha08-08

From the vantage of the past week of trading, the case looks clear for calling recent market volatility a sign of a risk-off pivot.The ratio of aggressive allocation vs. conservative allocation fell ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2457720348?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"https://static.seekingalpha.com/cdn/s3/uploads/getty_images/875074116/image_875074116.jpg","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2024-08-08 21:40","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","id":"2457720348","market":"hk","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Markets Take A Hit, But A Clear Risk-Off Signal Is Still In Dispute","media":"seekingalpha","content":"<div>\n<p>From the vantage of the past week of trading, the case looks clear for calling recent market volatility a sign of a risk-off pivot.The ratio of aggressive allocation vs. conservative allocation fell ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4712057-markets-take-hit-but-clear-risk-off-signal-still-in-dispute\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"seekingalpha","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Markets Take A Hit, But A Clear Risk-Off Signal Is Still In Dispute</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMarkets Take A Hit, But A Clear Risk-Off Signal Is Still In Dispute\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2024-08-08 21:40 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4712057-markets-take-hit-but-clear-risk-off-signal-still-in-dispute><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>From the vantage of the past week of trading, the case looks clear for calling recent market volatility a sign of a risk-off pivot.The ratio of aggressive allocation vs. conservative allocation fell ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4712057-markets-take-hit-but-clear-risk-off-signal-still-in-dispute\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":".SPX","symbol_name":"S&P 500 Index","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4712057-markets-take-hit-but-clear-risk-off-signal-still-in-dispute","article_id":"2457720348","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":["https://static.seekingalpha.com/cdn/s3/uploads/getty_images/875074116/image_875074116.jpg"],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2457720348","pubTimestamp":1723124400,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"seekingalpha","name":"Seeking Alpha"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Original Post Editor's Note: The summary bullets for this article were chosen by Seeking Alpha editors.","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"seekingalpha.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","OEX":"标普100","SPY":"标普500ETF","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SOXX":"iShares费城交易所半导体ETF","BK4504":"桥水持仓","USMV":"美国最小波动率ETF-iShares","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","SH":"标普500反向ETF","GOVT":"iShares安硕核心美国国债ETF","SHY":"债券指数ETF-iShares Barclays 1-3年国债","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4588":"碎股","IEF":"债券指数ETF-iShares Barclays 7-10年","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","BK4581":"高盛持仓","XLU":"公共事业指数ETF-SPDR","AOK":"iShares Conservative Allocation","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","BND":"债券指数ETF-Vanguard美国","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","IEI":"iShares Barclays 3-7 Year Trea","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","AOA":"iShares Aggressive Allocation Fu"},"translate_title":"市场遭受打击，但明确的避险信号仍存在争议","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"AOA":1,"XLU":1,"USMV":1,"SPY":1,"BND":1,"AOK":1,"SOXX":0.7,"IEF":0.6,".SPX":0.6,"SSO":0.6,"SPXU":0.6,"SHY":0.6,"SH":0.6,"SDS":0.6,"OEX":0.6,"OEF":0.6,"IVV":0.6,"IEI":0.6,"GOVT":0.6,"ZTmain":0.6,"ZFmain":0.6,"ZBmain":0.6,"UBmain":0.6,"TNmain":0.6,"ESmain":0.6},"content_text":"From the vantage of the past week of trading, the case looks clear for calling recent market volatility a sign of a risk-off pivot.The ratio of aggressive allocation vs. conservative allocation fell sharply in recent days, but the ratio’s 50-day average remains well above its 200-day counterpart.The ratio of medium-term Treasuries vs. shorter-term counterparts is more advanced in signaling a change in sentiment.   MarsYu From the vantage of the past week of trading, the case looks clear for calling recent market volatility a sign of a risk-off pivot. But if your time horizon is longer, there’s still room for debate, based on a set of ETF pairs for gauging the broad trend via prices through Aug. 7. From the vantage of two global asset allocation ETFs, the bull trend has suffered a setback, but it’s not yet clear if this is short-term noise or a longer-term signal. The ratio of aggressive allocation (AOA) vs. conservative allocation (AOK) fell sharply in recent days, but the ratio’s 50-day average remains well above its 200-day counterpart. Further deterioration for this ratio would put the bulls on the defensive in a more convincing degree, but at the moment there’s still a plausible, if battered, case for reserving judgment.    A similar profile applies to US stocks, based on the trend for a broad market proxy (SPY), vs. a low-volatility portfolio of American equities (USMV).    Ditto for the high-flying corner of semiconductor stocks relative to US shares overall (SPY).    For another perspective on deciding if market sentiment has genuinely shifted, consider how the defensive utilities sector (XLU) compares against stocks overall (SPY). This ratio tends to rise when a safe haven bias dominates. Although there’s been movement toward that shift, it’s not yet clear that an enduring change is underway.    On the other hand, the ratio of medium-term Treasuries (IEF) vs. shorter-term counterparts (SHY) is more advanced in signaling a change in sentiment. To the extent this ratio is trending higher, it’s a sign that the appetite for longer maturities is rising, which tends to equate with higher confidence that the “going long” trade will be profitable, fueled by expectations for macro-related troubles ahead. On that score, the latest upturn in IEF:SHY ratio deserves close attention.    On a related note, keep an eye on the US stock-bond ratio (BND). This gauge of risk-on/risk-off sentiment has crashed in recent days on a daily basis, which is a warning sign. But for the moment, the trend has only wobbled in terms of the 50-day/200-day averages. If the longer-term metric begins stumbling in the days and weeks ahead, it may be a more persuasive answer to the question we posed in early July: “Has Risk-On Run Out Of Road?”    Original Post Editor's Note: The summary bullets for this article were chosen by Seeking Alpha editors.","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.29.3","shortVersion":"4.29.3","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2457720348"}