SPLG: S&P 500 Dashboard For September

seekingalpha09-01

SPLG offers a cost-effective alternative to SPY with a lower expense ratio and a lower share price.The dashboard methodology uses median values of key financial ratios to evaluate sector fundamentals ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2464094983?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"https://static.seekingalpha.com/cdn/s3/uploads/getty_images/1751834130/image_1751834130.jpg","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2024-09-01 19:53","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","id":"2464094983","market":"nz","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"SPLG: S&P 500 Dashboard For September","media":"seekingalpha","content":"<div>\n<p>SPLG offers a cost-effective alternative to SPY with a lower expense ratio and a lower share price.The dashboard methodology uses median values of key financial ratios to evaluate sector fundamentals ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4718401-splg-s-and-p-500-dashboard-for-september\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"seekingalpha","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SPLG: S&P 500 Dashboard For September</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSPLG: S&P 500 Dashboard For September\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2024-09-01 19:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4718401-splg-s-and-p-500-dashboard-for-september><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SPLG offers a cost-effective alternative to SPY with a lower expense ratio and a lower share price.The dashboard methodology uses median values of key financial ratios to evaluate sector fundamentals ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4718401-splg-s-and-p-500-dashboard-for-september\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"BK4534","symbol_name":"瑞士信贷持仓","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4718401-splg-s-and-p-500-dashboard-for-september","article_id":"2464094983","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":["https://static.seekingalpha.com/cdn/s3/uploads/getty_images/1751834130/image_1751834130.jpg"],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2464094983","pubTimestamp":1725191627,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"seekingalpha","name":"Seeking Alpha"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"SPLG offers a cost-effective alternative to SPY with a lower expense ratio and a lower share price.The dashboard methodology uses median values of key financial ratios to evaluate sector fundamentals ","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"seekingalpha.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","BK4588":"碎股","SH":"标普500反向ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","OEX":"标普100","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","BK4581":"高盛持仓","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","BK4504":"桥水持仓","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SPLG":"SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF","SPY":"标普500ETF","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","VOO":"Vanguard标普500ETF","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念"},"translate_title":"SPLG：9月份标普500仪表板","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"VOO":1,"SPY":1,"SPLG":1,".SPX":1,"OEF":0.6,"UPRO":0.6,"SSO":0.6,"SPXU":0.6,"SH":0.6,"SDS":0.6,"OEX":0.6,"IVV":0.6,"ESmain":0.6},"content_text":"SPLG offers a cost-effective alternative to SPY with a lower expense ratio and a lower share price.The dashboard methodology uses median values of key financial ratios to evaluate sector fundamentals in the S&P 500.The energy sector has the best value and quality scores, while industrials and technology are the most overpriced.9 stocks cheaper than their industry peers based on 3 metrics.   Sean Anthony Eddy About SPLG This article series includes every month a dashboard with sector metrics in the S&P 500 index. It may help investors spot the sectors with the most (and least) attractive fundamentals. It may also serve as a top-down analysis of all funds tracking the S&P 500. Among them, SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:SPLG), launched in 2005, is less popular than SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY). Nonetheless, it has a cheaper expense ratio (0.02% vs. 0.09%) and a lower share price. It has over $44B of assets and an average daily volume of $369M, which is enough to satisfy long-term investors and traders. SPLG pays quarterly dividends. Shortcut The next two paragraphs in italic describe the dashboard methodology. They are necessary for new readers to understand the metrics. If you are used to this series or if you are short of time, you can skip them and go to the charts. Base Metrics I calculate the median value of five fundamental ratios in every sector: Earnings Yield (\"EY\"), Sales Yield (\"SY\"), Free Cash Flow Yield (\"FY\"), Return on Equity (\"ROE\"), Gross Margin (\"GM\"). All are calculated on trailing 12 months. For all these ratios, higher is better and negative is bad. EY, SY and FY are medians of the inverse of Price/Earnings, Price/Sales and Price/Free Cash Flow. They are better for statistical studies than price-to-something ratios, which are unusable when the \"something\" is close to zero or negative (for example, companies with negative earnings). I also calculate two momentum metrics for each group: the median monthly return (RetM) and the median annual return (RetY). I prefer medians rather than averages because a median splits a set in a good half and a bad half. Capital-weighted averages are skewed by extreme values and the largest companies. As a consequence, these metrics are designed for stock-picking rather than index investing. Value and Quality Scores Historical baselines are calculated as the averages on a look-back period of 11 years for all metrics. They are noted respectively EYh, SYh, FYh, ROEh, GMh. For example, the value of EYh for technology in the table below is the 11-year average of the median Earnings Yield of S&P 500 tech companies. The Value Score \"VS\" is the average difference in % between the three valuation ratios (EY, SY, FY) and their baselines (EYh, SYh, FYh). The same way, the Quality Score \"QS\" is the average difference between the two quality ratios (ROE, GM) and their baselines (ROEh, GMh).  VS may be interpreted as the percentage of undervaluation or overvaluation relative to the baseline (positive is good, negative is bad). This interpretation must be taken with caution: the baseline is an arbitrary reference, not a supposed fair value. The formula assumes that the three valuation metrics are of equal importance, except in energy and utilities where the Free Cash Flow Yield is ignored to avoid some inconsistencies. VS and QS are capped between -100 and +100 when the calculation goes beyond these values. Current data The next table shows the metrics and scores as of writing. Columns stand for the data defined above.     VS QS EY SY FY ROE GM EYh SYh FYh ROEh GMh RetM RetY   All -16.01 7.22 0.0371 0.3367 0.0223 16.67 48.81 0.0425 0.4072 0.0272 15.23 46.50 3.70% 19.02%   Cs. Discretionary -3.37 25.53 0.0451 0.4922 0.0334 31.54 38.85 0.0447 0.6338 0.0300 21.85 36.39 3.57% 9.15%   Cs. Staples -3.28 -8.14 0.0430 0.4856 0.0173 19.25 41.12 0.0416 0.4686 0.0208 23.39 40.54 3.10% 4.40%   Energy 100* 94.19 0.0712 0.5039 0.0331 21.65 45.49 0.0248 0.5465 -0.0024 7.64 43.32 -0.05% 2.54%   Financials 1.64 12.22 0.0630 0.4577 0.0707 13.15 80.84 0.0685 0.4305 0.0663 11.24 75.22 4.85% 39.09%   Healthcare -19.33 -8.65 0.0262 0.2590 0.0217 13.00 63.59 0.0335 0.2698 0.0320 15.71 63.61 2.38% 11.04%   Industrials -31.55 7.05 0.0328 0.2744 0.0196 22.91 40.07 0.0428 0.4986 0.0266 21.44 37.37 4.10% 22.08%   Technology -32.64 6.16 0.0257 0.1570 0.0222 25.49 62.69 0.0363 0.2469 0.0328 22.54 63.18 4.56% 22.66%   Communication 14.58 -4.92 0.0414 0.7403 0.0401 14.73 55.24 0.0456 0.5312 0.0353 16.53 54.66 2.05% 11.05%   Materials -22.87 -0.83 0.0302 0.5045 0.0181 16.73 37.43 0.0432 0.5906 0.0238 17.55 36.35 3.65% 18.86%   Utilities -11.37 10.08 0.0493 0.3718 -0.0779 10.49 44.67 0.0491 0.4838 -0.0572 9.65 40.08 2.14% 20.68%   Real Estate 2.59 8.35 0.0235 0.1112 0.0082 8.11 64.85 0.0235 0.1147 0.0074 6.88 65.65 5.68% 19.27%   Click to enlarge *capped for convenience Score charts The next chart plots the Value and Quality Scores by sector (higher is better).   Value and quality in the S&P 500 (Chart: author; data: Portfolio123) Score variations since last month:   Variations in value and quality ( Chart: author; data: Portfolio123) The next chart plots momentum scores based on median returns by sector.   Momentum in the S&P 500 (Chart: author; data: Portfolio123) Interpretation A theoretical S&P 500 median company is overvalued by 16% relative to historical averages since 2013. Its quality score is a bit above the historical baseline. We can translate median yields into their inverse ratios: Price/Earnings: 26.95 - Price/Sales: 2.97 - Price/Free Cash Flow: 44.84 Since February 2022, energy has shown the highest scores in both value and quality. The communication services sector is undervalued by almost 15% relative to 11-year averages. Consumer discretionary, consumer staples, financials and real estate are close to their historical baselines in valuation. Nonetheless, consumer discretionary has a better quality score than any other sector except energy. Utilities are moderately overvalued (by 11%), while healthcare and materials are overvalued by about 20%. Technology and industrials are overvalued by more than 30% relative to the baseline. Their quality scores are good, but not high enough to justify such overvaluation. SPLG has returned 27% in 12 months, while the median return of the S&P 500 is 19% (see the table above) and the equal-weight average is at 19.3% (measured on RSP). These are clues that the recent performance of the S&P 500 was significantly skewed by mega-cap companies. The table above is not only useful to calculate value and quality scores. It may also help spot companies looking cheap relative to their peers. For example, the EY column tells that a large consumer staples company with an Earnings Yield above 0.0430 (or price/earnings below 23.26) is in the better half of the sector regarding this metric. A Dashboard List is sent every month to Quantitative Risk & Value members, with companies standing in the better half among their peers regarding the three valuation metrics. The table below is a part of the list of 72 stocks sent to QRV members for this month.   Ticker Name Sector   MGM MGM Resorts International DISCRETIONARY   DVN Devon Energy Corp. ENERGY   SYF Synchrony Financial FINANCIAL   THC Tenet Healthcare Corp. HEALTHCARE   CAT Caterpillar, Inc. INDUSTRIAL   BLDR Builders FirstSource, Inc. MATERIALS   TAP Molson Coors Beverage Co. STAPLES   IDCC InterDigital, Inc. TECH   CNP CenterPoint Energy, Inc. UTIL   Click to enlarge  It is part of a larger rotational model with a statistical bias, not the result of individual stock analysis.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.29.2","shortVersion":"4.29.2","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2464094983"}