RPT-BREAKINGVIEWS-Beijing IPO meddling leaves bad taste in Hong Kong

Reuters2024-09-23

(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)

By Hudson Lockett

HONG KONG, Sept 23 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Few people like it when an initial public offering flops on the first day. The People's Republic, though, is taking such dislike to a new and unwarranted level. The China Securities Regulatory Commission has put on hold three bubble tea makers' plans to list in Hong Kong, Reuters reported on Friday. Why? Because peers have performed badly. Such heavy-handed intervention will leave a bad taste in the city.

It's true that fellow boba-drink brewers have had a tough time. In China, the industry relies on breakneck expansion through franchisees, resulting in urban centres quickly becoming suffused with stores on every corner, keeping prices low and margins razor thin. Shares in Chabaidao fell by more than a quarter on their stock market debut. They now languish almost 70% below their IPO price after first-half profit fell by around a fifth compared to the same period last year.

It's an open question whether the trio that were hoping to brew up interest in an IPO would have fared any better. One of them, Mixue Bingcheng, at least has scale on its side. It's the country's largest bubble tea chain with around 36,000 stores, some four times more than its closest rival, Guming, and had been hoping to raise up to $1 billion in a Hong Kong listing.

Mixue's size may well be part of the problems. In April, the CSRC promised to encourage “leading enterprises of industries in the Mainland to list in Hong Kong”, following a new approvals regime for offshore IPOs that launched in March of 2023.

The ostensible goal of that regime was to restart overseas listing after years of drought following a crackdown on technology companies selling stock abroad. Instead, the new system has produced a massive backlog of offshore listings still waiting for approval from the CSRC. That is hardly "bolstering Hong Kong's financial centre status”, as the commission vowed to do in April.

Yet, whether or not to sell new stock in an unfavourable market is the domain of a company's executives and investment bankers. If they want to risk it - and if investors want to risk buying it - so be it.

Sure, delaying the flow of offshore IPOs will certainly prevent more embarrassing day-one drops by companies the market deems overvalued. But it will also prevent successful listings by companies looking for funding, making the Hong Kong bourse's attempts to shake off three lean IPO years all the harder. In attempting to pick winners, Beijing may simply end up putting them on ice.

Follow @KangHexin on X

CONTEXT NEWS

The China Securities Regulatory Commission has delayed plans by at least three Chinese bubble tea makers to launch an initial public offering in Hong Kong this year due to the poor performance of peers who listed their shares on the city’s bourse, Reuters reported on Sept. 20.

IPO applications for two of the hopefuls lapsed earlier this year after six months of waiting for approval from the commission.

The commission in April said it would encourage “leading enterprises” of mainland industries to list in Hong Kong.

<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Graphic: Chabaidao shares have plummeted since listing

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>

(Editing by Antony Currie and Ujjaini Dutta)

((For previous columns by the author, Reuters customers can click on hudson.lockett@thomsonreuters.com))

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment