Intel: Not Worth The $90 Billion Price Tag For Qualcomm

seekingalpha09-23

Intel's valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

ZhongRenChun
09-23
ZhongRenChun
It's the perfect time to buy Intel. Price is lowest in 50 years. Once in a lifetime opportunity. If they miss this, they will never get a second chance. Buy now or regret it forever. 20 years ago Intel could have bought Nvidia. Never pass up a huge opportunity.
TylerL
09-23
TylerL
Hmmm i believe seekingalpha is overrated too . Shallow enough 馬後炮
Lio23
09-23
Lio23
What is the basis on the valuation of $5? In addition, Qualcomm's merger makes alot of sence for the US as a whole. Hope you closed your sell position.

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2469797419?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2024-09-23 12:18","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","id":"2469797419","market":"fut","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Intel: Not Worth The $90 Billion Price Tag For Qualcomm","media":"seekingalpha","content":"<div>\n<p>Intel's valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4722537-intel-not-worth-the-90-billion-price-tag-for-qualcomm\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"seekingalpha","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel: Not Worth The $90 Billion Price Tag For Qualcomm</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel: Not Worth The $90 Billion Price Tag For Qualcomm\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2024-09-23 12:18 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4722537-intel-not-worth-the-90-billion-price-tag-for-qualcomm><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Intel's valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4722537-intel-not-worth-the-90-billion-price-tag-for-qualcomm\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"LU1084165304.USD","symbol_name":"FIDELITY WORLD \"A\" (USD) ACC","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4722537-intel-not-worth-the-90-billion-price-tag-for-qualcomm","article_id":"2469797419","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2469797419","pubTimestamp":1727065092,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"seekingalpha","name":"Seeking Alpha"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Intel's valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to encounter significant regulatory, financial, and integration challenges.Intel struggles to harness the massive AI tailwinds, whereas Nvidia and AMD fully capitalize on them.   hapabapa Introduction I do not want to be boastful, but Intel's stock  has lost more than 30% of its value since I have shared my 'Strong Sell' recommendation back in May. My fundamental analysis update suggests that","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"seekingalpha.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"LU1084165304.USD":"FIDELITY WORLD \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BMPRXR70.SGD":"Neuberger Berman 5G Connectivity A Acc SGD-H","IE00BSNM7G36.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1261432733.SGD":"Fidelity World A-ACC-SGD","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4588":"碎股","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4141":"半导体产品","IE00BMPRXN33.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN 5G CONNECTIVITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0321505868.SGD":"Schroder ISF Global Dividend Maximiser A Dis SGD","LU1069344957.HKD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (HKD) INC","BK4566":"资本集团","LU1242518931.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Asia Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","BK4573":"虚拟现实","QCOM":"高通","LU0979878070.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1852331112.SGD":"Blackrock World Technology Fund A2 SGD-H","INTC":"英特尔","LU1951198990.SGD":"Natixis Thematics AI & Robotics Fund H-R/A SGD-H","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4529":"IDC概念","LU0823434740.USD":"BNP PARIBAS US GROWTH \"C\" (USD) INC","LU0127658192.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE0009356076.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU1035775433.USD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (USD) INC","LU1989764664.SGD":"CPR Invest - Global Disruptive Opportunities A2 Acc SGD-H","LU1303367103.USD":"摩根大通多经理另类基金 A (acc)","LU1923623000.USD":"Natixis Thematics AI & Robotics Fund R/A USD","LU1316542783.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD","LU2098885051.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Multi-Manager Alternatives A (acc) SGD","LU2247934214.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS SUSTAINABLE FUTURE CONNECTIVITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0823421416.USD":"BNP PARIBAS DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY \"C\" (USD) INC","LU1917777945.USD":"安联专题基金Cl AT Acc","LU1803068979.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Technology A (acc) SGD-H1","LU2458330243.SGD":"FRANKLIN SHARIAH TECHNOLOGY \"A-H1\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","LU1119994496.HKD":"FIDELITY WORLD \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU1988902786.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS GLOBAL ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0642271901.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD-H","LU0079474960.USD":"联博美国增长基金A","LU2106854487.HKD":"ALLIANZ THEMATICA \"AMG\" (HKD) INC","BK4575":"芯片概念","LU0082616367.USD":"摩根大通美国科技A（dist）","GB00BDT5M118.USD":"天利环球扩展Alpha基金A Acc","LU2360106780.USD":"BGF WORLD TECHNOLOGY \"A4\" (USD) INC","LU0823421333.USD":"BNP PARIBAS DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY \"C\" (USD) ACC","LU0719512351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - US Technology A (acc) SGD","LU1242518857.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU1823568750.SGD":"Fidelity Global Technology A-ACC SGD"},"translate_title":"英特尔：不值得高通900亿美元的标价","themeId":"","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"INTC":1,"QCOM":0.8},"content_text":"Intel's valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to encounter significant regulatory, financial, and integration challenges.Intel struggles to harness the massive AI tailwinds, whereas Nvidia and AMD fully capitalize on them.hapabapaIntroductionI do not want to be boastful, but Intel's stock (NASDAQ:INTC) has lost more than 30% of its value since I have shared my 'Strong Sell' recommendation back in May. My fundamental analysis update suggests that","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"-1","news_tag":"analysis","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0},"commentList":[{"id":352395730370640,"gmtCreate":1727072791483,"gmtModify":1727178157491,"author":{"id":"4142648172044492","authorId":"4142648172044492","name":"ZhongRenChun","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c0cf4ba617dbcd38e945f418f07c0df5","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f84859c65fc2d7681e28f6b8e9b0535a","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"4142648172044492","idStr":"4142648172044492"},"htmlText":"It's the perfect time to buy Intel.&nbsp; Price is lowest in 50 years.&nbsp; Once in a lifetime opportunity.&nbsp; If they miss this, they will never get a second chance.&nbsp; &nbsp;Buy now or regret it forever.&nbsp; 20 years ago Intel could have bought Nvidia. Never pass up a huge opportunity.&nbsp;","listText":"It's the perfect time to buy Intel.&nbsp; Price is lowest in 50 years.&nbsp; Once in a lifetime opportunity.&nbsp; If they miss this, they will never get a second chance.&nbsp; &nbsp;Buy now or regret it forever.&nbsp; 20 years ago Intel could have bought Nvidia. Never pass up a huge opportunity.&nbsp;","text":"It's the perfect time to buy Intel. Price is lowest in 50 years. Once in a lifetime opportunity. If they miss this, they will never get a second chance. Buy now or regret it forever. 20 years ago Intel could have bought Nvidia. Never pass up a huge opportunity.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/352395730370640","repostId":2469797419,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2469797419","pubTimestamp":1727065092,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2469797419?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2024-09-23 12:18","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Intel: Not Worth The $90 Billion Price Tag For Qualcomm","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2469797419","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Intel's valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to encounter significant regulatory, financial, and integration challenges.Intel struggles to harness the massive AI tailwinds, whereas Nvidia and AMD fully capitalize on them.   hapabapa Introduction I do not want to be boastful, but Intel's stock  has lost more than 30% of its value since I have shared my 'Strong Sell' recommendation back in May. My fundamental analysis update suggests that","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul style=\"\"><li><p>Intel&#39;s valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.</p></li><li><p>Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to encounter significant regulatory, financial, and integration challenges.</p></li><li><p>Intel struggles to harness the massive AI tailwinds, whereas Nvidia and AMD fully capitalize on them.</p></li></ul><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/86b9b7aceceb2996402c47a77ff3d6ae\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\"/></p><p>hapabapa</p><p></p><h2 id=\"id_97983588\">Introduction</h2><p>I do not want to be boastful, but Intel&#39;s stock (NASDAQ:INTC) has lost more than 30% of its value since I have shared my &#39;Strong Sell&#39; recommendation back in May. My fundamental analysis update suggests that</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel: Not Worth The $90 Billion Price Tag For Qualcomm</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel: Not Worth The $90 Billion Price Tag For Qualcomm\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2024-09-23 12:18 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4722537-intel-not-worth-the-90-billion-price-tag-for-qualcomm><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Intel's valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4722537-intel-not-worth-the-90-billion-price-tag-for-qualcomm\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU1084165304.USD":"FIDELITY WORLD \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BMPRXR70.SGD":"Neuberger Berman 5G Connectivity A Acc SGD-H","IE00BSNM7G36.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1261432733.SGD":"Fidelity World A-ACC-SGD","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4588":"碎股","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4141":"半导体产品","IE00BMPRXN33.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN 5G CONNECTIVITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0321505868.SGD":"Schroder ISF Global Dividend Maximiser A Dis SGD","LU1069344957.HKD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (HKD) INC","BK4566":"资本集团","LU1242518931.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Asia Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","BK4573":"虚拟现实","QCOM":"高通","LU0979878070.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1852331112.SGD":"Blackrock World Technology Fund A2 SGD-H","INTC":"英特尔","LU1951198990.SGD":"Natixis Thematics AI & Robotics Fund H-R/A SGD-H","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4529":"IDC概念","LU0823434740.USD":"BNP PARIBAS US GROWTH \"C\" (USD) INC","LU0127658192.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE0009356076.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU1035775433.USD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (USD) INC","LU1989764664.SGD":"CPR Invest - Global Disruptive Opportunities A2 Acc SGD-H","LU1303367103.USD":"摩根大通多经理另类基金 A (acc)","LU1923623000.USD":"Natixis Thematics AI & Robotics Fund R/A USD","LU1316542783.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD","LU2098885051.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Multi-Manager Alternatives A (acc) SGD","LU2247934214.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS SUSTAINABLE FUTURE CONNECTIVITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0823421416.USD":"BNP PARIBAS DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY \"C\" (USD) INC","LU1917777945.USD":"安联专题基金Cl AT Acc","LU1803068979.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Technology A (acc) SGD-H1","LU2458330243.SGD":"FRANKLIN SHARIAH TECHNOLOGY \"A-H1\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","LU1119994496.HKD":"FIDELITY WORLD \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU1988902786.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS GLOBAL ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0642271901.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD-H","LU0079474960.USD":"联博美国增长基金A","LU2106854487.HKD":"ALLIANZ THEMATICA \"AMG\" (HKD) INC","BK4575":"芯片概念","LU0082616367.USD":"摩根大通美国科技A（dist）","GB00BDT5M118.USD":"天利环球扩展Alpha基金A Acc","LU2360106780.USD":"BGF WORLD TECHNOLOGY \"A4\" (USD) INC","LU0823421333.USD":"BNP PARIBAS DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY \"C\" (USD) ACC","LU0719512351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - US Technology A (acc) SGD","LU1242518857.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU1823568750.SGD":"Fidelity Global Technology A-ACC SGD"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4722537-intel-not-worth-the-90-billion-price-tag-for-qualcomm","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2469797419","content_text":"Intel's valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to encounter significant regulatory, financial, and integration challenges.Intel struggles to harness the massive AI tailwinds, whereas Nvidia and AMD fully capitalize on them.hapabapaIntroductionI do not want to be boastful, but Intel's stock (NASDAQ:INTC) has lost more than 30% of its value since I have shared my 'Strong Sell' recommendation back in May. My fundamental analysis update suggests that","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":352362701205800,"gmtCreate":1727068852136,"gmtModify":1727068856191,"author":{"id":"3583610878683199","authorId":"3583610878683199","name":"TylerL","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2922f2277b2015f60d264867877b6ec8","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3583610878683199","idStr":"3583610878683199"},"htmlText":"Hmmm i believe seekingalpha is overrated too . Shallow enough 馬後炮","listText":"Hmmm i believe seekingalpha is overrated too . Shallow enough 馬後炮","text":"Hmmm i believe seekingalpha is overrated too . Shallow enough 馬後炮","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/352362701205800","repostId":2469797419,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2469797419","pubTimestamp":1727065092,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2469797419?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2024-09-23 12:18","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Intel: Not Worth The $90 Billion Price Tag For Qualcomm","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2469797419","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Intel's valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to encounter significant regulatory, financial, and integration challenges.Intel struggles to harness the massive AI tailwinds, whereas Nvidia and AMD fully capitalize on them.   hapabapa Introduction I do not want to be boastful, but Intel's stock  has lost more than 30% of its value since I have shared my 'Strong Sell' recommendation back in May. My fundamental analysis update suggests that","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul style=\"\"><li><p>Intel&#39;s valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.</p></li><li><p>Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to encounter significant regulatory, financial, and integration challenges.</p></li><li><p>Intel struggles to harness the massive AI tailwinds, whereas Nvidia and AMD fully capitalize on them.</p></li></ul><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/86b9b7aceceb2996402c47a77ff3d6ae\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\"/></p><p>hapabapa</p><p></p><h2 id=\"id_97983588\">Introduction</h2><p>I do not want to be boastful, but Intel&#39;s stock (NASDAQ:INTC) has lost more than 30% of its value since I have shared my &#39;Strong Sell&#39; recommendation back in May. My fundamental analysis update suggests that</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel: Not Worth The $90 Billion Price Tag For Qualcomm</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel: Not Worth The $90 Billion Price Tag For Qualcomm\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2024-09-23 12:18 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4722537-intel-not-worth-the-90-billion-price-tag-for-qualcomm><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Intel's valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4722537-intel-not-worth-the-90-billion-price-tag-for-qualcomm\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU1084165304.USD":"FIDELITY WORLD \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BMPRXR70.SGD":"Neuberger Berman 5G Connectivity A Acc SGD-H","IE00BSNM7G36.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1261432733.SGD":"Fidelity World A-ACC-SGD","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4588":"碎股","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4141":"半导体产品","IE00BMPRXN33.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN 5G CONNECTIVITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0321505868.SGD":"Schroder ISF Global Dividend Maximiser A Dis SGD","LU1069344957.HKD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (HKD) INC","BK4566":"资本集团","LU1242518931.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Asia Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","BK4573":"虚拟现实","QCOM":"高通","LU0979878070.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1852331112.SGD":"Blackrock World Technology Fund A2 SGD-H","INTC":"英特尔","LU1951198990.SGD":"Natixis Thematics AI & Robotics Fund H-R/A SGD-H","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4529":"IDC概念","LU0823434740.USD":"BNP PARIBAS US GROWTH \"C\" (USD) INC","LU0127658192.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE0009356076.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU1035775433.USD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (USD) INC","LU1989764664.SGD":"CPR Invest - Global Disruptive Opportunities A2 Acc SGD-H","LU1303367103.USD":"摩根大通多经理另类基金 A (acc)","LU1923623000.USD":"Natixis Thematics AI & Robotics Fund R/A USD","LU1316542783.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD","LU2098885051.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Multi-Manager Alternatives A (acc) SGD","LU2247934214.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS SUSTAINABLE FUTURE CONNECTIVITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0823421416.USD":"BNP PARIBAS DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY \"C\" (USD) INC","LU1917777945.USD":"安联专题基金Cl AT Acc","LU1803068979.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Technology A (acc) SGD-H1","LU2458330243.SGD":"FRANKLIN SHARIAH TECHNOLOGY \"A-H1\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","LU1119994496.HKD":"FIDELITY WORLD \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU1988902786.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS GLOBAL ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0642271901.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD-H","LU0079474960.USD":"联博美国增长基金A","LU2106854487.HKD":"ALLIANZ THEMATICA \"AMG\" (HKD) INC","BK4575":"芯片概念","LU0082616367.USD":"摩根大通美国科技A（dist）","GB00BDT5M118.USD":"天利环球扩展Alpha基金A Acc","LU2360106780.USD":"BGF WORLD TECHNOLOGY \"A4\" (USD) INC","LU0823421333.USD":"BNP PARIBAS DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY \"C\" (USD) ACC","LU0719512351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - US Technology A (acc) SGD","LU1242518857.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU1823568750.SGD":"Fidelity Global Technology A-ACC SGD"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4722537-intel-not-worth-the-90-billion-price-tag-for-qualcomm","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2469797419","content_text":"Intel's valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to encounter significant regulatory, financial, and integration challenges.Intel struggles to harness the massive AI tailwinds, whereas Nvidia and AMD fully capitalize on them.hapabapaIntroductionI do not want to be boastful, but Intel's stock (NASDAQ:INTC) has lost more than 30% of its value since I have shared my 'Strong Sell' recommendation back in May. My fundamental analysis update suggests that","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":352371420704912,"gmtCreate":1727066753798,"gmtModify":1727066758319,"author":{"id":"3576111671550713","authorId":"3576111671550713","name":"Lio23","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b6135851ddbd7ec6027deecfbe758d41","vip":1,"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3576111671550713","idStr":"3576111671550713"},"htmlText":"What is the basis on the valuation of $5? In addition, Qualcomm's merger makes alot of sence for the US as a whole. Hope you closed your sell position.","listText":"What is the basis on the valuation of $5? In addition, Qualcomm's merger makes alot of sence for the US as a whole. Hope you closed your sell position.","text":"What is the basis on the valuation of $5? In addition, Qualcomm's merger makes alot of sence for the US as a whole. Hope you closed your sell position.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/352371420704912","repostId":2469797419,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2469797419","pubTimestamp":1727065092,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2469797419?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2024-09-23 12:18","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Intel: Not Worth The $90 Billion Price Tag For Qualcomm","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2469797419","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Intel's valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to encounter significant regulatory, financial, and integration challenges.Intel struggles to harness the massive AI tailwinds, whereas Nvidia and AMD fully capitalize on them.   hapabapa Introduction I do not want to be boastful, but Intel's stock  has lost more than 30% of its value since I have shared my 'Strong Sell' recommendation back in May. My fundamental analysis update suggests that","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul style=\"\"><li><p>Intel&#39;s valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.</p></li><li><p>Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to encounter significant regulatory, financial, and integration challenges.</p></li><li><p>Intel struggles to harness the massive AI tailwinds, whereas Nvidia and AMD fully capitalize on them.</p></li></ul><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/86b9b7aceceb2996402c47a77ff3d6ae\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\"/></p><p>hapabapa</p><p></p><h2 id=\"id_97983588\">Introduction</h2><p>I do not want to be boastful, but Intel&#39;s stock (NASDAQ:INTC) has lost more than 30% of its value since I have shared my &#39;Strong Sell&#39; recommendation back in May. My fundamental analysis update suggests that</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel: Not Worth The $90 Billion Price Tag For Qualcomm</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel: Not Worth The $90 Billion Price Tag For Qualcomm\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2024-09-23 12:18 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4722537-intel-not-worth-the-90-billion-price-tag-for-qualcomm><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Intel's valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4722537-intel-not-worth-the-90-billion-price-tag-for-qualcomm\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU1084165304.USD":"FIDELITY WORLD \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BMPRXR70.SGD":"Neuberger Berman 5G Connectivity A Acc SGD-H","IE00BSNM7G36.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1261432733.SGD":"Fidelity World A-ACC-SGD","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4588":"碎股","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4141":"半导体产品","IE00BMPRXN33.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN 5G CONNECTIVITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0321505868.SGD":"Schroder ISF Global Dividend Maximiser A Dis SGD","LU1069344957.HKD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (HKD) INC","BK4566":"资本集团","LU1242518931.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Asia Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","BK4573":"虚拟现实","QCOM":"高通","LU0979878070.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1852331112.SGD":"Blackrock World Technology Fund A2 SGD-H","INTC":"英特尔","LU1951198990.SGD":"Natixis Thematics AI & Robotics Fund H-R/A SGD-H","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4529":"IDC概念","LU0823434740.USD":"BNP PARIBAS US GROWTH \"C\" (USD) INC","LU0127658192.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE0009356076.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU1035775433.USD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (USD) INC","LU1989764664.SGD":"CPR Invest - Global Disruptive Opportunities A2 Acc SGD-H","LU1303367103.USD":"摩根大通多经理另类基金 A (acc)","LU1923623000.USD":"Natixis Thematics AI & Robotics Fund R/A USD","LU1316542783.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD","LU2098885051.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Multi-Manager Alternatives A (acc) SGD","LU2247934214.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS SUSTAINABLE FUTURE CONNECTIVITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0823421416.USD":"BNP PARIBAS DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY \"C\" (USD) INC","LU1917777945.USD":"安联专题基金Cl AT Acc","LU1803068979.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Technology A (acc) SGD-H1","LU2458330243.SGD":"FRANKLIN SHARIAH TECHNOLOGY \"A-H1\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","LU1119994496.HKD":"FIDELITY WORLD \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU1988902786.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS GLOBAL ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0642271901.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD-H","LU0079474960.USD":"联博美国增长基金A","LU2106854487.HKD":"ALLIANZ THEMATICA \"AMG\" (HKD) INC","BK4575":"芯片概念","LU0082616367.USD":"摩根大通美国科技A（dist）","GB00BDT5M118.USD":"天利环球扩展Alpha基金A Acc","LU2360106780.USD":"BGF WORLD TECHNOLOGY \"A4\" (USD) INC","LU0823421333.USD":"BNP PARIBAS DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY \"C\" (USD) ACC","LU0719512351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - US Technology A (acc) SGD","LU1242518857.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU1823568750.SGD":"Fidelity Global Technology A-ACC SGD"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4722537-intel-not-worth-the-90-billion-price-tag-for-qualcomm","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2469797419","content_text":"Intel's valuation appears overestimated; DCF analysis suggests a target price of $5 per share, far below current market cap.Aside from the unrealistic $90 billion price tag, the merger is likely to encounter significant regulatory, financial, and integration challenges.Intel struggles to harness the massive AI tailwinds, whereas Nvidia and AMD fully capitalize on them.hapabapaIntroductionI do not want to be boastful, but Intel's stock (NASDAQ:INTC) has lost more than 30% of its value since I have shared my 'Strong Sell' recommendation back in May. My fundamental analysis update suggests that","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"isCommentEnd":false,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":14,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":3,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.29.1","shortVersion":"4.29.1","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2469797419"}