Google Doesn't Need Chrome. Why the DOJ Crackdown Is No Big Deal. -- Barrons.com

Dow Jones11-21 19:02

By George Glover

The Biden administration wants to force Google to ditch its Chrome web browser. Investors in parent company Alphabet shouldn't sweat it.

The Justice Department said in a court filing late Wednesday that the Big Tech company should be forced to sell its web browser, as part of a push to end its monopoly in online search. Plaintiffs said Google has inflicted "decadelong harm" on the market and "must divest Chrome" to fix that.

Google didn't immediately respond to a Barron's request for comment.

In a statement, Kent Walker, Alphabet and Google's chief legal officer, said the DOJ had submitted a "staggering proposal" that "goes miles beyond the court's decision" and "would break a range of Google products."

The company's vice president for regulatory affairs Lee-Anne Mulholland said previously that the government "putting its thumb on the scale in these ways would harm consumers, developers and American technological leadership."

The market didn't seem too fazed. Alphabet shares edged down 0.4% ahead of Thursday's opening bell, roughly in line with losses for futures tracking the benchmark S&P 500.

Chrome is a relatively small part of Google's business -- it would go for as much as $20 billion if divested, according to Bloomberg Intelligence. As of Wednesday's close, Alphabet had a market valuation of $2.2 trillion, more than 100 times that.

Even if the spinoff did happen that doesn't mean users would ditch Google's search engine for rivals such as Bing and DuckDuckGo, which account for less than 10% of the overall market.

There is also the possibility the breakup doesn't actually happen. Legal scholars see Judge Amit Mehta, who will oversee a trial starting in April to decide how to address Google's illegal monopolization, as being likely to follow precedent.

That doesn't mean the breakup will actually happen. Legal scholars see Mehta as a by-the-book judge who is likely to follow precedent.

The closest parallel is a case that happened almost a quarter of a century ago. In June 2000, a judge ordered the breakup of Microsoft -- but that decision was later reversed on appeal. Google has plans to appeal any ruling here, too.

Write to George Glover at george.glover@dowjones.com

This content was created by Barron's, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. Barron's is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

November 21, 2024 06:02 ET (11:02 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment