Luxury Names Are Less Exposed to U.S. Tariffs Than Sporting-Goods Brands -- Market Talk

Dow Jones04-01

0929 GMT - Luxury companies could have more capacity to maneuver than sporting-goods brands amid tariff uncertainty in the U.S., RBC Capital Markets analyst Piral Dadhania says. The luxury sector is less exposed to tariffs given higher margins, pricing power and lower presence in the U.S. on average, the analyst says. Companies can either raise prices, change their sourcing models, renegotiate supplier terms or absorb tariff costs, Dadhania says. Any implemented tariffs impacting luxury companies could result in higher prices in the U.S., the analyst says. There is higher tariff risk for Nike, Puma and Dr. Martens, while Moncler and LVMH are less exposed. (andrea.figueras@wsj.com)

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

April 01, 2025 05:30 ET (09:30 GMT)

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2524675931?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2025-04-01 17:30","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2524675931","market":"other","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Luxury Names Are Less Exposed to U.S. Tariffs Than Sporting-Goods Brands -- Market Talk","media":"Dow Jones","content":"<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\n     0929 GMT - Luxury companies could have more capacity to maneuver than sporting-goods brands amid tariff uncertainty in the U.S., RBC Capital Markets analyst Piral Dadhania says. The luxury sector is less exposed to tariffs given higher margins, pricing power and lower presence in the U.S. on average, the analyst says. Companies can either raise prices, change their sourcing models, renegotiate supplier terms or absorb tariff costs, Dadhania says. Any implemented tariffs impacting luxury companies could result in higher prices in the U.S., the analyst says. There is higher tariff risk for Nike, Puma and Dr. Martens, while Moncler and LVMH are less exposed. (andrea.figueras@wsj.com) \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  April 01, 2025 05:30 ET (09:30 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Luxury Names Are Less Exposed to U.S. Tariffs Than Sporting-Goods Brands -- Market Talk</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLuxury Names Are Less Exposed to U.S. Tariffs Than Sporting-Goods Brands -- Market Talk\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-04-01 17:30</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\n     0929 GMT - Luxury companies could have more capacity to maneuver than sporting-goods brands amid tariff uncertainty in the U.S., RBC Capital Markets analyst Piral Dadhania says. The luxury sector is less exposed to tariffs given higher margins, pricing power and lower presence in the U.S. on average, the analyst says. Companies can either raise prices, change their sourcing models, renegotiate supplier terms or absorb tariff costs, Dadhania says. Any implemented tariffs impacting luxury companies could result in higher prices in the U.S., the analyst says. There is higher tariff risk for Nike, Puma and Dr. Martens, while Moncler and LVMH are less exposed. (andrea.figueras@wsj.com) \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  April 01, 2025 05:30 ET (09:30 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"BK4146","symbol_name":"鞋类","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","article_id":"2524675931","we_media_id":"106","thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2524675931","pubTimestamp":1743499800,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":{"media_name":"Dow Jones","introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"summary":"0929 GMT - Luxury companies could have more capacity to maneuver than sporting-goods brands amid tariff uncertainty in the U.S., RBC Capital Markets analyst Piral Dadhania says. The luxury sector is less exposed to tariffs given higher margins, pricing power and lower presence in the U.S. on average, the analyst says. Companies can either raise prices, change their sourcing models, renegotiate supplier terms or absorb tariff costs, Dadhania says. Any implemented tariffs impacting luxury companies could result in higher prices in the U.S., the analyst says. There is higher tariff risk for Nike, Puma and Dr. Martens, while Moncler and LVMH are less exposed. ","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"BK4146":"鞋类","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","LU2098885051.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Multi-Manager Alternatives A (acc) SGD","LU0823411888.USD":"法巴消费创新基金 Cap","LU1303367103.USD":"摩根大通多经理另类基金 A (acc)","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4558":"双十一","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4588":"碎股","BK4202":"服装、服饰与奢侈品","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","NKE":"耐克","LU0786609619.USD":"高盛全球千禧一代股票组合Acc","LVMUY":"路易威登"},"translate_title":"奢侈品品牌比体育用品品牌更少受到美国关税的影响——市场讨论","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"LVMUY":0.9,"NKE":0.9},"content_text":"0929 GMT - Luxury companies could have more capacity to maneuver than sporting-goods brands amid tariff uncertainty in the U.S., RBC Capital Markets analyst Piral Dadhania says. The luxury sector is less exposed to tariffs given higher margins, pricing power and lower presence in the U.S. on average, the analyst says. Companies can either raise prices, change their sourcing models, renegotiate supplier terms or absorb tariff costs, Dadhania says. Any implemented tariffs impacting luxury companies could result in higher prices in the U.S., the analyst says. There is higher tariff risk for Nike, Puma and Dr. Martens, while Moncler and LVMH are less exposed. (andrea.figueras@wsj.com) \n\n\n \n\n\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n  April 01, 2025 05:30 ET (09:30 GMT)\n\n\n  Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":true,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.35.12","shortVersion":"4.35.12","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2524675931","isCrawlerRequest":true}