Tata Steel challenges Jharkhand GST tax and penalty order in High Court

Reuters03-12 22:36

<a href="https://laohu8.com/S/TATLY">Tata Steel</a> challenges Jharkhand GST tax and penalty order in High Court

Tata Steel Ltd. has filed a writ petition in the Jharkhand High Court challenging a GST adjudication order that directed it to pay tax of ₹493.35 crore, a penalty of ₹638.83 crore, and applicable interest. The case stems from a show-cause notice alleging wrongful input tax credit claims under Section 74(1) of the CGST/SGST Acts read with the IGST Act for FY2018-19 to FY2022-23. The company said it has a strong case on merits and is seeking to have the order quashed.

Disclaimer: This news brief was created by Public Technologies (PUBT) using generative artificial intelligence. While PUBT strives to provide accurate and timely information, this AI-generated content is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial, investment, or legal advice. Tata Steel Ltd. published the original content used to generate this news brief via Singapore Exchange Limited (SGX) (Ref. ID: EFSZAC6NPR99IWWQ) on March 12, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained therein.

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2618130278?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-03-12 22:36","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2618130278","market":"nz","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Tata Steel challenges Jharkhand GST tax and penalty order in High Court","media":"Reuters","content":"<html xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\" xmlns:newsg2=\"http://iptc.org/std/nar/2006-10-01/\" xmlns:xhtml=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\"><head><title>\n      <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TATLY\">Tata Steel</a> challenges Jharkhand GST tax and penalty order in High Court\n    </title></head><body><div xmlns:xsd=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:xsi=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance\">\n<p>\n        Tata Steel Ltd. has filed a writ petition in the Jharkhand High Court challenging a GST adjudication order that directed it to pay tax of ₹493.35 crore, a penalty of ₹638.83 crore, and applicable interest. The case stems from a show-cause notice alleging wrongful input tax credit claims under Section 74(1) of the CGST/SGST Acts read with the IGST Act for FY2018-19 to FY2022-23. The company said it has a strong case on merits and is seeking to have the order quashed.\n      </p>\n</div><div xmlns:xsd=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:xsi=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance\">\n<p>\n<i>Disclaimer: <span>This news brief was created by Public Technologies (PUBT) using generative artificial intelligence. While PUBT strives to provide accurate and timely information, this AI-generated content is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial, investment, or legal advice. Tata Steel Ltd. published the original content used to generate this news brief via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPXCF\">Singapore Exchange</a> Limited (SGX) (Ref. ID: EFSZAC6NPR99IWWQ) on March 12, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained therein.</span></i>\n</p>\n</div></body></html>","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tata Steel challenges Jharkhand GST tax and penalty order in High Court</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTata Steel challenges Jharkhand GST tax and penalty order in High Court\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1032215980\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-03-12 22:36</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\" xmlns:newsg2=\"http://iptc.org/std/nar/2006-10-01/\" xmlns:xhtml=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\"><head><title>\n      <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TATLY\">Tata Steel</a> challenges Jharkhand GST tax and penalty order in High Court\n    </title></head><body><div xmlns:xsd=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:xsi=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance\">\n<p>\n        Tata Steel Ltd. has filed a writ petition in the Jharkhand High Court challenging a GST adjudication order that directed it to pay tax of ₹493.35 crore, a penalty of ₹638.83 crore, and applicable interest. The case stems from a show-cause notice alleging wrongful input tax credit claims under Section 74(1) of the CGST/SGST Acts read with the IGST Act for FY2018-19 to FY2022-23. The company said it has a strong case on merits and is seeking to have the order quashed.\n      </p>\n</div><div xmlns:xsd=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:xsi=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance\">\n<p>\n<i>Disclaimer: <span>This news brief was created by Public Technologies (PUBT) using generative artificial intelligence. While PUBT strives to provide accurate and timely information, this AI-generated content is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial, investment, or legal advice. Tata Steel Ltd. published the original content used to generate this news brief via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPXCF\">Singapore Exchange</a> Limited (SGX) (Ref. ID: EFSZAC6NPR99IWWQ) on March 12, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained therein.</span></i>\n</p>\n</div></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"SG9999014484.SGD","symbol_name":"Nikko AM ASEAN Equity Fund A SGD","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://api.refinitiv.com/data/news/v1/stories/urn:newsml:reuters.com:20260312:nNDL2cPYB3:1","article_id":"2618130278","we_media_id":"1032215980","thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2618130278","pubTimestamp":1773326210,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":{"media_name":"Reuters","introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"id":"1032215980","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48"},"summary":"Tata Steel Ltd. has filed a writ petition in the Jharkhand High Court challenging a GST adjudication order that directed it to pay tax of 493.35 crore, a penalty of 638.83 crore, and applicable interest. The case stems from a show-cause notice alleging wrongful input tax credit claims under Section 74 of the CGST/SGST Acts read with the IGST Act for FY2018-19 to FY2022-23. The company said it has a strong case on merits and is seeking to have the order quashed.Disclaimer: This news brief was created by Public Technologies  using generative artificial intelligence. While PUBT strives to provide accurate and timely information, this AI-generated content is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial, investment, or legal advice. Tata Steel Ltd. published the original content used to generate this news brief via Singapore Exchange Limited   on March 12, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained therein.","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"SG9999014484.SGD":"Nikko AM ASEAN Equity Fund A SGD","LU0441851309.USD":"JPM ASEAN EQUITY \"A\" ACC","LU0192582467.USD":"SCHRODER ISF ASIAN EQUITY YIELD \"A\" (USD) INC MF","LU0877626530.USD":"FIDELITY ASIA PACIFIC DIVIDEND \"A\" (USD) INC MONTHLY (G)","SG9999004360.SGD":"Nikko AM Shenton Thrift Fund SGD","BK6033":"金融交易所和数据","LU0831103253.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Asia Pacific Income A (mth) SGD","IE00BKZH1Z71.USD":"BNY MELLON ASIAN INCOME \"B\" (USD) ACC","SG9999001846.SGD":"Schroder Asian Equity Yield A Dis SGD","LU1119993845.HKD":"FIDELITY ASIA PACIFIC DIVIDEND \"A\" (HKDHDG) INC","SG9999003826.SGD":"日兴资管新加坡股息基金 SGD","SG9999013486.USD":"LIONGLOBAL SINGAPORE DIVIDEND EQUITY (USD) INC A","SG9999013460.SGD":"LionGlobal Singapore Dividend Equity Fund SGD","LU0326948709.USD":"SCHRODER ISF ASIAN TOTAL RETURN \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2242646235.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS GLOBAL DIVIDENDS PLUS \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0188438112.USD":"SCHRODER ISF ASIAN EQUITY YIELD \"A\" ACC","SG9999000343.SGD":"Schroder Singapore Trust A Dis SGD","LU2242646821.SGD":"Fidelity Global Dividend Plus A-MINCOME(G)-SGD","SG9999013478.USD":"利安新加坡股息基金","TATLY":"Tata Steel, Ltd.","SG9999006266.SGD":"MANULIFE SINGAPORE EQUITY \"A\" (SGD) ACC","LU1920063259.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS GLOBAL DIVIDEND PLUS \"A\" (USDHDG) INC","LU2401740654.USD":"FIDELITY SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL DIVIDEND PLUS \"A\" (USD) INC","LU2242652126.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS GLOBAL DIVIDENDS PLUS \"A\" (USD) INC","LU1920062954.HKD":"FIDELITY FUNDS GLOBAL DIVIDEND PLUS \"A\" (HKDHDG) INC","LU0532188223.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - ASEAN Equity A (acc) SGD","LU0898667661.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Asia Pacific Income A (mth) SGD-H","SGXZ27511609.SGD":"NIKKO AM SINGAPORE DIVIDEND EQUITY \"SGD\" (SGD) ACC","BK6523":"ESG概念","LU0205439572.USD":"富达亚太股息基金","SG9999001135.SGD":"United ASEAN Fund SGD","SG9999016042.SGD":"Schroder Singapore Trust A Acc SGD","SG9999014492.USD":"NIKKO AM ASEAN EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1839390173.USD":"JPM ASEAN EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","BK6516":"银行与投资服务概念","SGXZ58947870.SGD":"LIONGLOBAL SINGAPORE DIVIDEND EQUITY (SGDHDG) INC"},"translate_title":"塔塔钢铁公司在高等法院挑战贾坎德邦商品及服务税和罚款令","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"TATLY":1.91},"content_text":"Tata Steel challenges Jharkhand GST tax and penalty order in High Court\n    \n\n        Tata Steel Ltd. has filed a writ petition in the Jharkhand High Court challenging a GST adjudication order that directed it to pay tax of ₹493.35 crore, a penalty of ₹638.83 crore, and applicable interest. The case stems from a show-cause notice alleging wrongful input tax credit claims under Section 74(1) of the CGST/SGST Acts read with the IGST Act for FY2018-19 to FY2022-23. The company said it has a strong case on merits and is seeking to have the order quashed.\n      \n\n\nDisclaimer: This news brief was created by Public Technologies (PUBT) using generative artificial intelligence. While PUBT strives to provide accurate and timely information, this AI-generated content is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial, investment, or legal advice. Tata Steel Ltd. published the original content used to generate this news brief via Singapore Exchange Limited (SGX) (Ref. ID: EFSZAC6NPR99IWWQ) on March 12, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained therein.","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"policyRegulatory","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":true,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"tenantId":"TBGLOBAL","deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.36.2","shortVersion":"4.36.2","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2618130278","isCrawlerRequest":true}