Rigel says final ARROW data show 70% response rate for GAVRETO in RET+ NSCLC

Reuters04-01
Rigel says final ARROW data show 70% response rate for GAVRETO in RET+ NSCLC
  • Rigel reported final Phase 1/2 ARROW trial results for once-daily RET inhibitor Gavreto in metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC, published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, with added long-term follow-up versus earlier disclosures.
  • Study showed durable tumor responses across treated populations, supporting Gavreto positioning as a first-line option.
  • Data also indicated activity in patients with baseline central nervous system metastases, reinforcing potential use in broader real-world settings.
  • Safety profile remained manageable with no new safety signals, though treatment-related deaths were reported in a subset of treatment-naive patients in Asia.


Disclaimer: This news brief was created by Public Technologies (PUBT) using generative artificial intelligence. While PUBT strives to provide accurate and timely information, this AI-generated content is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial, investment, or legal advice. Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc. published the original content used to generate this news brief via PR Newswire (Ref. ID: 202603310805PR_NEWS_USPR_____SF23013) on March 31, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained therein.

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment