Why The S&P 500 Is Trading On Oil Prices, Not Earnings

Benzinga_recent_news04-06

At 1:23 PM Eastern on April 2, ES futures hit 6,510, down nearly 100 points from their overnight high, before snapping back 130 points into the close on $2.8 billion in buy-side market-on-close orders...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2625671070?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com//next-assets/images/benzinga-post-card-placeholder.svg?optimize=medium&dpr=2&auto=webp&width=240?op=imageView2&mode=2&width=256&height=256&quality=70&format=png","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-04-06 20:45","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2625671070","market":"sh","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Why The S&P 500 Is Trading On Oil Prices, Not Earnings","media":"Benzinga_recent_news","content":"<div>\n<p>At 1:23 PM Eastern on April 2, ES futures hit 6,510, down nearly 100 points from their overnight high, before snapping back 130 points into the close on $2.8 billion in buy-side market-on-close orders...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/04/51655863/why-the-s-and-p-500-is-trading-on-oil-prices-not-earnings\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"benzinga_recent_news","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why The S&P 500 Is Trading On Oil Prices, Not Earnings</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy The S&P 500 Is Trading On Oil Prices, Not Earnings\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-04-06 20:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/04/51655863/why-the-s-and-p-500-is-trading-on-oil-prices-not-earnings><strong>Benzinga_recent_news</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>At 1:23 PM Eastern on April 2, ES futures hit 6,510, down nearly 100 points from their overnight high, before snapping back 130 points into the close on $2.8 billion in buy-side market-on-close orders...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/04/51655863/why-the-s-and-p-500-is-trading-on-oil-prices-not-earnings\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"NOBL","symbol_name":"ProShares S&P 500 Aristocrats ETF","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/04/51655863/why-the-s-and-p-500-is-trading-on-oil-prices-not-earnings","article_id":"2625671070","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":["https://static.tigerbbs.com//next-assets/images/benzinga-post-card-placeholder.svg?optimize=medium&dpr=2&auto=webp&width=240?op=imageView2&mode=2&width=256&height=256&quality=70&format=png"],"rights":{"source":"benzinga_recent_news","url":"https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/04/51655863/why-the-s-and-p-500-is-trading-on-oil-prices-not-earnings","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2625671070","pubTimestamp":1775479500,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"benzinga_recent_news","name":"Benzinga"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"At 1:23 PM Eastern on April 2, ES futures hit 6,510, down nearly 100 points from their overnight high, before snapping back 130 points into the close on $2.8 billion in buy-side market-on-close orders. The contract settled at 6,624, essentially flat. The VIX barely moved. And yet, beneath the surface, the options market was screaming a single message: this isn’t over.That mechanical close masked what institutional derivatives positioning was actually saying about the weeks ahead. With crude oil above $112, the Strait of Hormuz disrupted, Non-Farm Payrolls dropping into a three-day weekend with zero hedging ability, and dealer gamma deeply negative, the S&P 500 has entered a phase where oil prices matter more than anything coming out of earnings season. The data behind that thesis is worth examining closely.One trade stood out above the rest. Someone bought 79,979 VIX 50-strike calls expiring October 2026, paying full premium. That trade isn’t a bet on a bad week. It’s a bet on sustaine","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"benzinga.com","property":["earning"],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"NOBL":"ProShares S&P 500 Aristocrats ETF","SPHQ":"Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF","VTV":"Vanguard Value ETF","SPMO":"Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF","RSP":"平均加权指数ETF-Rydex S&P","JEPI":"JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF","SSO":"2倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","ACWI":"MSCI全球ETF-iShares","VV":"Vanguard Large-Cap ETF","OEX":"标普100","BK4581":"高盛持仓","ITOT":"安硕核心标普全美股市ETF-iShares","GSLC":"Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF","SH":"做空标普500-Proshares","IVW":"标普500成长股指数ETF-iShares","SCHB":"Schwab US Broad Market ETF","BMAY":"Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May","SPYV":"SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","IVE":"标普500价值指数ETF-iShares","XDTE":"Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF","VBK":"美国小盘成长股ETF-Vanguard","XLG":"Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF","ETFT":"Fundsmith Equity ETF","HIBL":"Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","IJH":"标普中型股400指数ETF-iShares","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","SFY":"SoFi Select 500 ETF","SPXL":"三倍做多标普500ETF-Direxion","VEU":"Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF","SPYD":"SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF","XYLD":"Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF","TSPY":"TappAlpha SPY Growth & Daily Income ETF","SPYG":"SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500 ETF-ProShares","SPUS":"SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF","VTI":"大盘指数ETF-Vanguard MSCI","SPXS":"三倍做空标普500ETF-Direxion","IVV":"标普500ETF-iShares",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","GPIX":"GOLDMAN SACHS S&P 500 CORE PREMIUM INCOME ETF","BK4504":"桥水持仓","SPLV":"Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","IJR":"标普小型股600指数ETF-iShares","SPYI":"NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF","SCHX":"Schwab US Large-Cap ETF","MOAT":"VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF","SPUU":"Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares","YSPY":"GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF","DBSC":"Deepwater Beachfront Small Cap ETF","ALLW":"SPDR BRIDGEWATER ALL WEATHER ETF","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF-ProShares","SPDN":"Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1X Shares","SPYM":"投资组合标普500指数ETF-SPDR","SPHD":"标普500高股利投资组合ETF-PowerShares","BK4588":"碎股","SPYQ":"2倍做多SPY Quarterly ETF-Tradr"},"translate_title":"为什么标普500根据油价而不是收益进行交易","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"SPXS":0.6,"VTI":0.6,"IVE":0.6,"MOAT":0.6,"XLG":0.6,"ETFT":0.6,"SPUS":0.6,"IVV":0.6,"SFY":0.6,"OEX":0.6,"SCHB":0.6,"SPHD":0.6,"GSLC":0.6,"IJR":0.6,"RSP":0.6,"SH":0.6,"SPYD":0.6,"SPYI":0.6,"SCHX":0.6,"IVW":0.6,"NOBL":0.6,"SSO":0.6,"TSPY":0.6,"ALLW":0.6,"BMAY":0.6,"MESmain":0.6,"ITOT":0.6,"SPLV":0.6,"SPYV":0.6,"SPUU":0.6,"YSPY":0.6,"SPXL":0.6,"SPYG":0.6,"OEF":0.6,"HIBL":0.6,"JEPI":0.6,"DBSC":0.6,"SPDN":0.6,".SPX":1.98,"VEU":0.6,"VTV":0.6,"XYLD":0.6,"VV":0.6,"SPYM":0.6,"SDS":0.6,"GPIX":0.6,"SPMO":0.6,"IJH":0.6,"XDTE":0.6,"ACWI":0.6,"SPYQ":0.6,"UPRO":0.6,"SPXU":0.6,"SPHQ":0.6,"VBK":0.6,"ESmain":0.6},"content_text":"At 1:23 PM Eastern on April 2, ES futures hit 6,510, down nearly 100 points from their overnight high, before snapping back 130 points into the close on $2.8 billion in buy-side market-on-close orders. The contract settled at 6,624, essentially flat. The VIX barely moved. And yet, beneath the surface, the options market was screaming a single message: this isn’t over.\nThat mechanical close masked what institutional derivatives positioning was actually saying about the weeks ahead. With crude oil above $112, the Strait of Hormuz disrupted, Non-Farm Payrolls dropping into a three-day weekend with zero hedging ability, and dealer gamma deeply negative, the S&P 500 has entered a phase where oil prices matter more than anything coming out of earnings season. The data behind that thesis is worth examining closely.\nThe Strait of Hormuz has been effectively disrupted since the start of the Iran conflict. Iran prepared a monitoring pact with Oman, requiring shipping tolls. The USS Ford carrier repositioned to rejoin operations. A drone struck Iraq’s Trebil border crossing. None of this is de-escalation.\nCrude at $112 isn’t contained to energy stocks. It feeds into consumer inflation expectations, manufacturing input costs, and transportation margins within weeks. Chicago Fed President Goolsbee called the oil price rise “quite serious” on April 2 and warned that extended increases would show up in inflation expectations, the scenario the Fed fears most because it forces them to hold rates steady while the economy weakens underneath.\nPut simply, $112 oil is repricing the entire rate-cut timeline for the second half of 2026. Initial Jobless Claims came in at 202K versus 212K expected on the same day, showing the labor market still healthy enough that the Fed has no urgency to ease. Strong jobs plus rising oil equals the old stagflation calculus, where monetary policy has no good options.\nWhen you strip away intraday noise, derivatives positioning tells a cleaner story than price action.\nSPX put open interest sat at 11.84 million contracts versus 8.07 million calls on April 2. The 25-delta risk reversal printed at -0.085, confirming persistent put skew. Across the major index ETFs, net delta exposure was -$9.46 billion, ranking at the 87th percentile for bearish positioning. That’s not cautious. That’s directionally committed.\nThe largest premium trades reinforced this conviction. Microsoft puts dominated the session’s flow: $73 million in April 17 $460 puts, $72 million in $450 puts, $55 million in $475 puts. Five of the ten largest single-name option trades that day were MSFT downside protection. When institutions buy that much protection on a mega-cap name, they aren’t hedging one earnings report. They’re hedging a macro scenario that plays out over months.\nOne trade stood out above the rest. Someone bought 79,979 VIX 50-strike calls expiring October 2026, paying full premium. That trade isn’t a bet on a bad week. It’s a bet on sustained, elevated volatility through the back half of the year. The size and expiration suggest genuine institutional conviction that the current conditions have months to run, not days.\nOne of the less-discussed dynamics driving the market’s intraday behavior is how options dealer positioning has shifted.\nGamma notional was negative $236.86 million heading into the close. In practical terms, when large options dealers carry negative gamma, they hedge by selling into declines and buying into rallies, amplifying directional moves rather than dampening them. That explains why 100-point intraday swings on ES have become routine rather than exceptional.\nA forward-looking stability reading was at just 16% at the close, meaning the conditions for a large move were coiled and present. Low readings don’t guarantee timing, but they tell you the structure is compressed and waiting for a catalyst.\nNon-Farm Payrolls released at 8:30 AM Friday, April 3. Markets were closed for Good Friday. Futures didn’t reopen until 6:00 PM Sunday. That’s 57.5 hours of exposure with no ability to adjust positions.\nThe week following April 7-10 was stacked: ISM Services on Monday, FOMC Minutes on Wednesday, Core PCE and GDP on Thursday, CPI on Friday. Four potential volatility events in five sessions, all hitting a market positioned at the 87th percentile for bearish delta with negative dealer gamma and a coiled stability reading.\nThe setup heading into Q2 isn’t ambiguous. Crude above $110 keeps inflation expectations elevated. The Fed can’t cut with oil-driven CPI running hot. Institutions are directionally committed to the downside. Dealer gamma amplifies moves in both directions. The stability reading is compressed.\nRallies into the ES 6,627-6,641 range, where dealer positioning flips and overhead gamma concentrates, are likely to attract selling. The path of least resistance stays lower until the Iran situation resolves or crude breaks back below $100.\nThe contrarian risk deserves mention because positioning is so one-sided. Any genuine de-escalation signal, a ceasefire announcement, diplomatic channels reopening, the strait normalizing, could trigger a violent unwind. The 80,000 VIX 50-strike calls and $300 million in MSFT puts tell you institutions see the asymmetry and are bracing for something worse, but they also know a peace headline could compress months of hedging into a single session.\nThe 200-day moving average on SPX sits at 6,644, hovering just above current price like a verdict that hasn’t been delivered yet.\nDisclosure: The author may hold positions in ES futures, SPY options, and related instruments at the time of publication. Past results are not indicative of future performance. This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or futures contract.\nBenzinga Disclaimer: This article is from an unpaid external contributor. It does not represent Benzinga’s reporting and has not been edited for content or accuracy.\nTo add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"tenantId":"TBGLOBAL","deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.40.0","shortVersion":"4.40.0","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2625671070","isCrawlerRequest":true}