14 charts reveal the massive challenges facing UK and NATO defence spending

cityam04-07

The problems of defence spending shortfalls are looming over Rachel Reeves. Defence spending is casting a shadow over Downing Street. Military officers are in a state of despair. The choices facing ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2625982674?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"https://www.cityam.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Rachel-Reeves-defence-Recovered-e1775141218158.jpeg?w=400&h=225&crop=1","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-04-07 07:09","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2625982674","market":"fut","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"14 charts reveal the massive challenges facing UK and NATO defence spending","media":"cityam","content":"<div>\n<p>The problems of defence spending shortfalls are looming over Rachel Reeves. Defence spending is casting a shadow over Downing Street. Military officers are in a state of despair. The choices facing ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cityam.com/charts-uk-defence-reeves-nato-starmer-trump/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cityam_highlight","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>14 charts reveal the massive challenges facing UK and NATO defence spending</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n14 charts reveal the massive challenges facing UK and NATO defence spending\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-04-07 07:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cityam.com/charts-uk-defence-reeves-nato-starmer-trump/><strong>cityam</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The problems of defence spending shortfalls are looming over Rachel Reeves. Defence spending is casting a shadow over Downing Street. Military officers are in a state of despair. The choices facing ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cityam.com/charts-uk-defence-reeves-nato-starmer-trump/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"DIP","symbol_name":"BTD CAPITAL FUND","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.cityam.com/charts-uk-defence-reeves-nato-starmer-trump/","article_id":"2625982674","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":["https://www.cityam.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Rachel-Reeves-defence-Recovered-e1775141218158.jpeg?w=400&h=225&crop=1"],"rights":{"source":"cityam_highlight","url":"https://www.cityam.com/charts-uk-defence-reeves-nato-starmer-trump/","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2625982674","pubTimestamp":1775516940,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"cityam_highlight","name":"cityam"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"The problems of defence spending shortfalls are looming over Rachel Reeves. Defence spending is casting a shadow over Downing Street. Military officers are in a state of despair. The choices facing Sir Keir Starmer are stark. The political calculus for the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has become more complicated than ever as the Iran war puts public finances in danger.Their difficulties go back to February 2025 when US President Donald Trump looked set to impose a Russian-influenced peace plan on Ukraine. Successive presidents had urged Europe to catch up and make a fair contribution to Nato. With this US administration, the demand was urgent.Starmer set out his government’s commitment to raise defence spending, which includes resources for intelligence services, to 2.6 per cent of GDP from 2027 through to the next General Election in three years.The government was dealing with complex security arrangements across the network of intelligence-sharing nations known as the “Five Eyes – Aust","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"cityam.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"DIP":"BTD CAPITAL FUND","NATO":"Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF","BK4588":"碎股","ITA":"iShares Dow Jones U.S. Aerospace","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念"},"translate_title":"14张图表揭示了英国和北约国防开支面临的巨大挑战","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"DIP":1,"ITA":1.5,"NATO":1.5},"content_text":"The problems of defence spending shortfalls are looming over Rachel Reeves. Defence spending is casting a shadow over Downing Street. Military officers are in a state of despair. The choices facing Sir Keir Starmer are stark. The political calculus for the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has become more complicated than ever as the Iran war puts public finances in danger.Their difficulties go back to February 2025 when US President Donald Trump looked set to impose a Russian-influenced peace plan on Ukraine. Successive presidents had urged Europe to catch up and make a fair contribution to Nato. With this US administration, the demand was urgent. Starmer set out his government’s commitment to raise defence spending, which includes resources for intelligence services, to 2.6 per cent of GDP from 2027 through to the next General Election in three years. \n\nHe also laid out a bold-yet-flimsy commitment that the UK would get to three per cent some time between 2029 and 2034. \n\n\n\n\n\n\nNews Updates\nStay ahead with our three daily briefings delivering all the key market moves, top business and political stories, and incisive analysis straight to your inbox.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nFour months later, Starmer went further. He agreed to raise core defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP by 2035, with an extra 1.5 per cent to be spent on resilience and security. Reeves’ Treasury has intervened on these costly commitments. It has insisted that the “ambition” to get to the three per cent mark will only be achieved “when economic and fiscal conditions allow”. It has steered clear of providing a comment on how the UK could ever get to 3.5 per cent.As the government has delayed the publication of the much-awaited Defence Investment Plan (DIP) by more than six months – a strategy paper that will set out funding for defence projects and the design of the armed forces – Starmer has now been besieged by Ministry of Defence (MoD) officials to overrule the Treasury. \n\nMilitary officials have reportedly warned that there could be a £28bn funding shortfall for the armed forces and security services over the next four years due to spiralling costs – more on this later. Starmer himself admitted that he needed to know “where the money’s coming from” before publishing the DIP. The economics of defence spending is now one of the major issues looming over Downing Street every day. The political and economic dilemmas unsettling the Prime Minister and the Chancellor are made clear by this series of charts and the bleak choices they help reveal. Starmer’s battle against NATO Whitehall was not well-prepared for the return of a reinvigorated Trump to the White House. \n\nThe government was dealing with complex security arrangements across the network of intelligence-sharing nations known as the “Five Eyes – Australia, Canada and New Zealand, alongside the US and the UK. Throughout, London has remained dependent on Washington for the maintenance of the UK’s nuclear deterrent. In recent years, the US has ramped up defence spending at an astonishing pace while Europe and Canada have struggled to keep up. A Nato estimate now suggests the US accounts for about 60 per cent of total expenditure across the 32 members. \nIf Trump carries out his threat to leave Nato, it could leave Europe and Canada exposed, forcing members to rethink the purpose of the alliance altogether.Without the US, the UK becomes Nato’s second biggest spender behind Germany, strengthening its relative position in the alliance. \n\n\nWhen Nato measures the contributions of member states to ensure they have kept their promises, it looks at military spending as a share of GDP. This makes oversight more of a political matter than an underlying economic cause. In these terms, the UK fares less well. A wider geographical trend emerges: countries that are closer to Russia spend more on defence as a portion of their economy. \nEven if it finds the political will to lift defence expenditure to 2.6 per cent of GDP, the UK will only be on a par with the Netherlands. It will lag far behind Germany, which rewrote its national borrowing rules to permit deeper investment in defence. Government officials have said that Nato recorded a lower level of expenditure as a share of GDP than previously estimated, because GDP figures have been revised several times. There is credibility to this assessment. The UK economy could have ended 2025 on a vastly different note than was thought at various points by key forecasters at the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) and Bank of England. \nPerhaps the UK government need not worry too much about missing the target for 2026. Growth, after all, is set to be a lot lower in 2026 due the war in the Middle East. Capital Economics’ worst case scenario has the figure at 0.3 per cent.Off target: How UK defence spending is missingThe defence budget will be protected especially when tough economic times are matched by bleak geopolitics. The bulk of spending belongs to the MoD rather than the Foreign Office or Home Office, Nonetheless, a look at the deeper characteristics is revealing. The MoD puts more focus on capital than seen in other departments. This comes at a cost of spending on other day-to–day activities, which covers areas like soldiers’ wages, management of naval bases and airfields or costs incurred by missions. \nThis breakdown of the MoD’s spending makes it clear that capital expenditure is essential to defence, making it distinct from most other departments such as health or the Home Office.Nato sets a target for 20 per cent of members’ expenditure to go towards equipment, with the rest going towards personnel and other day-to-day spending. The UK spends about 33 per cent on equipment. Apart from the F-35s or the fleet that makes up the Royal Navy, there is one clear reason why the UK spends so much on equipment: nuclear weapons. The UK’s ultimate deterrent is managed by a body which accounts for a sixth of the MoD’s £60bn budget, the Defence Nuclear Enterprise.\nFrance’s expansion of its nuclear arsenal and extension of its deterrent to cover European countries has prompted some, including the Liberal Democrats, to argue that the UK should build its own nuclear missile infrastructure to end dependence on the US. The US both builds and maintains Trident warheads under a service-life programme. The UK builds its own Vanguard-class submarines and the new Dreadnought vessels that carry nuclear weapons. But a recent Policy Exchange paper found that there is a long history, particularly throughout the Cold War, of military officials and political figures arguing in favour of a full UK control of its deterrent. But plans to build weapons were consistently unaffordable. Financial pressures are just as tight today. Despite Starmer’s pledge to focus on defence, the UK is lagging far behind the linear trend needed to get to 3.5 per cent of GDP. \nThe OBR has warned that, according to today’s prices, the UK government needs to spend £6bn more in the financial year ending 2029, the last year of the current Spending Review period, to keep defence expenditure on a linear path to get to 3.5 per cent by 2035. Its linear path assumption is based on defence spending needing to be 2.6 per cent of GDP. The chart above suggests that spending as a share of GDP would be slightly higher in 2028-29 if the government wished to stay on a linear track. Reeves always has the option of announcing an emergency budget or re-opening the 2028-29 settlement when the Treasury sets departmental limits again in 2027. However, substantial spending commitments would require the fiscal watchdog to make another assessment on public finance. If the UK wished to get to 3.5 per cent immediately, then it would have to spend around £40bn more a year. Other Nato countries have ramped up expenditure at a much faster pace.  Germany has committed to hitting the 3.5 per cent target by 2029. According to Nato, it spent just 1.2 per cent of GDP on defence as recently as 2018. Poland has also ramped up defence spending from around 2.2 per cent of GDP after the pandemic to as much as 2.8 per cent of GDP in 2024. Reeves would struggle to find the cash to get the UK war-ready, even if she was to fully commit to the policy. A huge increase in borrowing would be needed, making her politically cherished fiscal rules the first casualty of any such move. \nA combination of deep spending cuts and steep tax hikes, plus other policy adjustments, would be the likelier option for Reeves but such a cocktail is politically perilous. Alternatively, the windfall of much higher growth could support an increase in expenditure.","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"-1","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"tenantId":"TBGLOBAL","deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.40.0","shortVersion":"4.40.0","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2625982674","isCrawlerRequest":true}