Phillips 66 Stock Sheds 4.1%, Underperforms Peers

Dow Jones04-10

This article was automatically generated by Dow Jones using technology from Automated Insights.

Shares of Phillips 66 slid 4.1% to $161.07 on what proved to be an all-around positive trading session for the stock market, with the S&P 500 Index rising 0.6% to 6,824.66 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average rising 0.6% to 48,185.80.

This was the stock's third consecutive day of losses.

Phillips 66 closed 15.5% short of its 52-week high of $190.61, which the company reached on March 30th.

The stock underperformed when compared to some of its peers, as Enterprise Products Partners L.P. fell 1.3% to $37.52, Kinder Morgan Inc. remained unchanged, and Williams Cos. fell 0.26% to $72.82.

Trading volume totaled 3.3 million, compared to the 50-day average of 3.3 million.

Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

April 09, 2026 16:35 ET (20:35 GMT)

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2626897158?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-04-10 04:35","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2626897158","market":"fut","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Phillips 66 Stock Sheds 4.1%, Underperforms Peers","media":"Dow Jones","content":"<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\n  This article was automatically generated by Dow Jones using technology from Automated Insights. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Shares of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PSX\">Phillips 66</a> slid 4.1% to $161.07 on what proved to be an all-around positive trading session for the stock market, with the S&amp;P 500 Index rising 0.6% to 6,824.66 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average rising 0.6% to 48,185.80. \n</p>\n<p>\n     This was the stock's third consecutive day of losses. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Phillips 66 closed 15.5% short of its 52-week high of $190.61, which the company reached on March 30th. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The stock underperformed when compared to some of its peers, as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EPDU\">Enterprise Products Partners L.P.</a> fell 1.3% to $37.52, Kinder Morgan Inc. remained unchanged, and Williams Cos. fell 0.26% to $72.82. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Trading volume totaled 3.3 million, compared to the 50-day average of 3.3 million. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet \n</p>\n<pre style=\"white-space: pre\">\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  April 09, 2026 16:35 ET (20:35 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Phillips 66 Stock Sheds 4.1%, Underperforms Peers</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPhillips 66 Stock Sheds 4.1%, Underperforms Peers\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-04-10 04:35</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\n  This article was automatically generated by Dow Jones using technology from Automated Insights. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Shares of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PSX\">Phillips 66</a> slid 4.1% to $161.07 on what proved to be an all-around positive trading session for the stock market, with the S&amp;P 500 Index rising 0.6% to 6,824.66 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average rising 0.6% to 48,185.80. \n</p>\n<p>\n     This was the stock's third consecutive day of losses. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Phillips 66 closed 15.5% short of its 52-week high of $190.61, which the company reached on March 30th. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The stock underperformed when compared to some of its peers, as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EPDU\">Enterprise Products Partners L.P.</a> fell 1.3% to $37.52, Kinder Morgan Inc. remained unchanged, and Williams Cos. fell 0.26% to $72.82. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Trading volume totaled 3.3 million, compared to the 50-day average of 3.3 million. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet \n</p>\n<pre style=\"white-space: pre\">\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  April 09, 2026 16:35 ET (20:35 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"PSX","symbol_name":"Phillips 66","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","article_id":"2626897158","we_media_id":"106","thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2626897158","pubTimestamp":1775766900,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":{"media_name":"Dow Jones","introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"summary":"This article was automatically generated by Dow Jones using technology from Automated Insights.Shares of Phillips 66 slid 4.1% to $161.07 on what proved to be an all-around positive trading session for the stock market, with the S&P 500 Index rising 0.6% to 6,824.66 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average rising 0.6% to 48,185.80.This was the stock's third consecutive day of losses.Phillips 66 closed 15.5% short of its 52-week high of $190.61, which the company reached on March 30th.The stock underperformed when compared to some of its peers, as Enterprise Products Partners L.P. fell 1.3% to $37.52, Kinder Morgan Inc. remained unchanged, and Williams Cos. fell 0.26% to $72.82.Trading volume totaled 3.3 million, compared to the 50-day average of 3.3 million.","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"","property":["rate"],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"PSX":"Phillips 66"},"translate_title":"Phillips 66股票下跌4.1%，表现逊于同行","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"PSX":1.5},"content_text":"This article was automatically generated by Dow Jones using technology from Automated Insights. \n\n\n     Shares of Phillips 66 slid 4.1% to $161.07 on what proved to be an all-around positive trading session for the stock market, with the S&P 500 Index rising 0.6% to 6,824.66 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average rising 0.6% to 48,185.80. \n\n\n     This was the stock's third consecutive day of losses. \n\n\n     Phillips 66 closed 15.5% short of its 52-week high of $190.61, which the company reached on March 30th. \n\n\n     The stock underperformed when compared to some of its peers, as Enterprise Products Partners L.P. fell 1.3% to $37.52, Kinder Morgan Inc. remained unchanged, and Williams Cos. fell 0.26% to $72.82. \n\n\n     Trading volume totaled 3.3 million, compared to the 50-day average of 3.3 million. \n\n\n  Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet \n\n\n \n\n\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n  April 09, 2026 16:35 ET (20:35 GMT)\n\n\n  Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"-1","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":true,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"tenantId":"TBGLOBAL","deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.40.0","shortVersion":"4.40.0","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2626897158","isCrawlerRequest":true}