Quantum Stocks Are Cooling After 2025 Gains. What's Next for IonQ, D-Wave, and Peers. -- Barrons.com

Dow Jones03:49

By Mackenzie Tatananni

The quantum computing industry is learning a hard lesson in markets: What goes up fast can come down even faster.

It's no exaggeration to say 2025 was a blowout year for quantum stocks. Shares in D-Wave Quantum more than tripled, while Rigetti Computing surged 45%, outstripping a 20% gain for the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100.

The gains came on the heels of a watershed year for quantum investment. Aiming to capitalize on the enthusiasm, a handful of companies went public in early 2026, while others are gearing up to make their trading debuts.

Last year's momentum has finally allowed analysts to distinguish the industry leaders from the laggards. In a note last week, Northland Research analyst Nehal Chokshi named IonQ -- the aspiring "Nvidia of quantum" -- as the player most likely to achieve broad quantum advantage by the end of the decade.

And while the stocks continue to gather support on Wall Street, the hype is cooling off. The three foremost pure plays -- IonQ, Rigetti, and D-Wave -- are trading in the red this year, down 5.3%, 26%, and 30%, respectively. The Nasdaq 100 has gained more than 8% over the same period.

As Yiazou Capital Research founder Yiannis Zourmpanos noted in a Substack post Friday, 2026 has introduced "a more sober investor environment." So far this year, high-risk tech stocks have trailed the broader market against a backdrop of sticky inflation, tight monetary policy, and a rotation out of speculative growth stocks.

Zourmpanos noted that the valuations of quantum stocks in particular "remain disconnected from fundamentals." Macro pressures caused some quantum stocks to plummet as much as 60% from their peaks earlier this year, and shares "remain vulnerable to sharp de-rating."

In late 2025, Barron's questioned whether a quantum bubble was forming. Fittingly for the subject, the outlook was so clouded by uncertainty that a firm verdict remained out of reach.

Quantum was thrust squarely into the spotlight last year as the United Nations dubbed 2025 the International Year of Quantum, with the technology securing endorsements and funding commitments from big names like Nvidia that were exploring their own ambitions in the space.

Despite growing traction among analysts and heavy media coverage, investors are waking up to a hard truth: The quantum revolution won't happen overnight. As Zourmpanos correctly noted, fault-tolerant quantum computing "remains firmly on a post-2029 timeline." Fault tolerance describes a system's ability to operate normally even when its individual components fail or experience disruption.

Long-term estimates from McKinsey project a market valued at anywhere from $45 billion to $131 billion by 2040. Global Growth Insights projects a more conservative $16.33 billion by 2035. The only certainty, it seems, is uncertainty.

It may be frustrating to hear the old refrain that quantum is a long-term bet, but this year's price swings prove that patience is the only viable strategy. For now, speculative hype is simply part of the package.

Write to Mackenzie Tatananni at mackenzie.tatananni@barrons.com

This content was created by Barron's, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. Barron's is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

April 27, 2026 15:49 ET (19:49 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment