Narrative Says AI Will Destroy Software Companies: What This Means For Your Portfolio

Benzinga_recent_news00:10

The narrative has decided that AI will devastate software companies, their workforces, and by extension, your portfolio. CBS News, CNBC, and Harvard Business Review have all written the obituary. ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2630316662?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"https://cdn.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2026/04/27/WYW-3D-Cover-3-formats.jpeg?optimize=medium&dpr=2&auto=webp&width=240","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-04-28 00:10","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2630316662","market":"sh","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Narrative Says AI Will Destroy Software Companies: What This Means For Your Portfolio","media":"Benzinga_recent_news","content":"<div>\n<p>The narrative has decided that AI will devastate software companies, their workforces, and by extension, your portfolio. CBS News, CNBC, and Harvard Business Review have all written the obituary.\n...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/04/52069708/narrative-says-ai-will-destroy-software-companies-but-history-begs-to-differ\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"benzinga_recent_news","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Narrative Says AI Will Destroy Software Companies: What This Means For Your Portfolio</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNarrative Says AI Will Destroy Software Companies: What This Means For Your Portfolio\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-04-28 00:10 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/04/52069708/narrative-says-ai-will-destroy-software-companies-but-history-begs-to-differ><strong>Benzinga_recent_news</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The narrative has decided that AI will devastate software companies, their workforces, and by extension, your portfolio. CBS News, CNBC, and Harvard Business Review have all written the obituary.\n...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/04/52069708/narrative-says-ai-will-destroy-software-companies-but-history-begs-to-differ\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"BK4551","symbol_name":"寇图资本持仓","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/04/52069708/narrative-says-ai-will-destroy-software-companies-but-history-begs-to-differ","article_id":"2630316662","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":["https://cdn.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2026/04/27/WYW-3D-Cover-3-formats.jpeg?optimize=medium&dpr=2&auto=webp&width=240"],"rights":{"source":"benzinga_recent_news","url":"https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/04/52069708/narrative-says-ai-will-destroy-software-companies-but-history-begs-to-differ","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2630316662","pubTimestamp":1777306200,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"benzinga_recent_news","name":"Benzinga"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"AI headlines predict software sector collapse. What the Luddites, ATMs, and Napster reveal about surviving disruption.","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"benzinga.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","AI":"C3.ai, Inc.","BK4587":"ChatGPT概念","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4588":"碎股","ARTY":"ISHARES FUTURE AI & TECH ETF","BK4023":"应用软件","AIYY":"YIELDMAX AI OPTION INCOME STRATEGY ETF","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","AIPO":"Defiance AI and Power Infrastructure ETF","CHAT":"ROUNDHILL GENERATIVE AI & TECHNOLOGY ETF","BK4543":"AI","AGIX":"通用人工智能 ETF-AGIX"},"translate_title":"叙述称人工智能将摧毁软件公司：这对您的投资组合意味着什么","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"AIPO":1.5,"AGIX":1.5,"AIYY":0.6,"CHAT":1.5,"ARTY":1.5,"AI":0.79},"content_text":"The narrative has decided that AI will devastate software companies, their workforces, and by extension, your portfolio. CBS News, CNBC, and Harvard Business Review have all written the obituary.\nNearly 55,000 U.S. layoffs are attributed to AI in 2025 alone, and here’s a twist worth noting: many of those layoffs are being driven not by AI’s actual performance, but by companies anticipating its potential. The tone is equal parts alarm and inevitability, as if the outcome is predestined.\nMaybe. But certainty has a habit of making itself look foolish.\nIn the English textile towns of Nottinghamshire, Yorkshire, and Lancashire, between 1811 and 1816, a group of skilled weavers and textile workers took matters into their own hands. They called themselves Luddites, after Ned Ludd, a young apprentice who was rumored to have wrecked a textile machine in a fit of rage back in 1779. There’s no evidence Ludd actually existed, but just like Robin Hood, he became the mythical leader of the movement.\nThe protesters claimed to be following orders from “General Ludd,” and they smashed power looms across the countryside to save their wages and their way of life.\nThey weren’t wrong about the short-term pain. The machines were taking their jobs, their wages, and their dignity. The British government responded by making machine-breaking a capital offense. Seventeen men were executed. The movement was crushed.\nAnd yet. Over the following decades, power looms didn’t shrink the textile workforce. They expanded it. Lower costs drove demand, created factories, and built cities. In the decades that followed, those cities created entirely new categories of work that no one had imagined: railway engineers, telegraph operators, and factory managers running workforces of thousands.\nThe Luddites lost the argument, but it took a full generation for anyone to notice, and by then, most of the original workers were long gone.\nBank teller employment in the United States once peaked at nearly 600,000 jobs. Today, there are roughly half that number, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics projects a further 13% decline by 2034. When ATMs arrived in the 1970s, conventional wisdom was swift and decisive: bank tellers were finished. Why pay a person to do what a machine could do for less? Insightful and absolutely wrong.\nAs economist James Bessen of Boston University documented, teller employment actually increased as ATM deployment accelerated. ATMs reduced the cost of operating a branch, and banks responded by opening 43% more branches to compete for greater market share. The machine took the routine cash transactions. The human got relationship banking, financial guidance, and the complex problems no ATM could solve.\nThe real blow came decades later and from an entirely unexpected direction. Mobile banking made the branch visit largely unnecessary, and with it, the teller. Not the ATM. The iPhone.\nThe technology everyone feared didn’t deliver the predicted outcome. A wholly different technology, arriving thirty years later, reshaped the entire landscape. Nobody standing in front of the first ATM in 1970 saw that coming. Nobody could have.\nFor the teller laid off in 2015, none of this history paid the rent. The vindication of the long run has never arrived on the schedule of personal hardship.\nIn 1999, a nineteen-year-old college dropout named Shawn Fanning built Napster in his dorm room and accidentally declared war on the music industry. Within two years, 80 million users were sharing songs for free. The narrative was immediate and unanimous: the internet had killed the music business. The CD (the industry’s golden goose) was finished. Artists would never be fairly compensated again.\nThey were right about the disruption and the CDs' demise. They were completely wrong about the destination.\nStreaming didn’t exist yet. Nobody was predicting it. But Spotify launched in 2008, Apple Music followed, and the global recorded music industry grew to $31.7 billion by 2025, more than double its 2014 low of $13 billion.\nThe labels that survived weren’t the ones that fought the technology hardest. They were the ones who built their business model around the new infrastructure rather than defending the old one.\nThe narrative of total destruction was as wrong as the certainty behind it. The internet didn’t kill music. It disaggregated it, disrupted it, and ultimately expanded it in ways nobody in Fanning’s dorm room in 1999 could have mapped.\nSound familiar?\nHere is where compassion and investing must coexist, because dismissing the disruption as a historical inevitability doesn’t make it hurt less for the people living through it.\nAI will displace real people doing real work. A software engineer who spent a decade building a skill set may find that skill set repriced practically overnight. A customer service worker, a junior analyst, a graphic designer, these are not abstractions.\nThey are people with mortgages, kids, and retirement accounts that depend on income that may look very different in five years. That pain is real, and it deserves more than a shrug dressed up as optimism.\nAnd yet, for patient investors, the evidence offers something more durable than optimism. It offers a pattern. IBM acknowledged that AI absorbed hundreds of human resources tasks while simultaneously increasing hiring in areas requiring critical thinking. Salesforce cut its customer support workforce nearly in half (from 9,000 to 5,000) after deploying AI agents, while demand grew for workers who could build, manage, and refine those agents.\nThe World Economic Forum projects 170 million new jobs created by 2030, against 92 million displaced. That’s a net gain, though one that won’t land evenly or on anyone’s preferred timeline. The new jobs, the ones nobody sees coming, quietly become the ones everyone eventually takes for granted.\nThis isn’t the first time history has offered investors a clearer lens than headlines. I explored a similar inflection point in The Hidden History Behind the Market’s 10% Return.\nFirst, resist making permanent decisions based on today’s narrative. The specific temptation right now is to wholesale exit software and technology because the headlines say AI will destroy it.\nThat’s the Luddite error, assuming you know the destination of the disruption when our track record suggests nobody ever does.\nSecond, not all software companies are alike, and the distinction matters enormously. A firm selling basic automation tools faces a very different AI future than one building the infrastructure AI runs on. Some will be disrupted. Others will be the disruptors. And some, those with proprietary data, deep customer relationships, and durable brand strength, may emerge from this moment more anti-fragile than they entered it.\nPainting the entire sector with one brush is exactly the kind of imprecision that leads investors to make bad decisions in both directions.\nThird, and least glamorously: stay invested and stay diversified. The investors who held through the electrification of industry, the automation of manufacturing, and the rise of the internet weren’t rewarded because they were lucky or prescient. They were rewarded because they didn’t flinch.\nPatience isn’t a passive virtue in investing. It’s the active choice to trust your investing process over the panic.\nFarmers have always known that a field stripped of its current crop isn’t a lost field. It’s a field being restored. The workers caught in the fallow period aren’t wrong to feel the loss. But investors with the patience to wait for the next harvest have rarely been disappointed.\nThis moment is no different. The pattern is consistent, the evidence is long, and the choice — as it has always been — is not to bet on human anxiety, but to bet on human adaptability.\nAs always, invest often and wisely. Thank you for reading.\nimage credit: Author \nOriginally published on April 20, 2026, at www.CosmoDeStefano.com. Used with permission.\nMy book, Wealth Your Way, is available on Amazon, and consider subscribing to my monthly newsletter, with fresh, no-fluff insights on money, investing, and building lasting wealth.\nThe content provided is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice. You are welcome to share, quote, or use the content — including for research or machine learning — please credit Cosmo P. DeStefano and link to www.CosmoDeStefano.com.\nBenzinga Disclaimer: This article is from an unpaid external contributor. It does not represent Benzinga’s reporting and has not been edited for content or accuracy.\nTo add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"-1","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"tenantId":"TBGLOBAL","deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.42.0","shortVersion":"4.42.0","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2630316662","isCrawlerRequest":true}