New Zealand Amending Law to Prevent Climate Damage Claims Against Companies -- OPIS

Dow Jones05-12
 

The New Zealand government will amend the Climate Change Response Act 2002 to stop tort liability for climate change damage or harm caused by greenhouse gas emissions due to its complex litigation, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said in a news release on Tuesday.

The move comes in response to ongoing High Court litigation, with climate activist Michael Smith suing six major greenhouse gas emitters, including dairy giant Fonterra Co-operative Group. A trial date is set for 2027.

The case alleges that the companies' emissions have contributed to climate change and harmed Smith's land, interests and cultural rights.

The amendment would prevent courts from finding tort liability for climate damage in both the current case and future lawsuits, effectively dismissing the legal pathway opened by the Supreme Court's 2024 ruling that Smith's claim was arguable.

"Our response to climate change is best managed by the Government at a national level and not through piece-meal litigation in the courts," Goldsmith said.

"The courts are not the right place to resolve claims of harm from climate change, and tort law is not well-suited to respond to a problem like climate change which involves a range of complex environmental, economic and social factors".

New Zealand already has a national legal framework to manage greenhouse gas emissions through the Climate Change Response Act 2002 and its Emissions Trading Scheme or ETS.

The government says it is acting to maintain the coherence of the regulatory system and deliver consistent obligations for greenhouse gas emitters, rather than allowing a patchwork of court-driven outcomes that could contradict Parliament's existing climate framework.

Lawyers for Climate Action NZ criticized the move, arguing it will insulate climate polluters from liability and shield the largest emitters from the costs of climate-related damage. The group said the change raises fundamental issues for the environment and the constitutional role of the courts, and argued that climate change legislation and the ETS do not allocate responsibility for damage caused by emissions.

"This announcement is a blatant attempt to prevent Mike Smith's proceeding against seven of New Zealand's largest emitting companies from going to trial," the group said in a news release. "The Government announcement itself makes it clear these amendments are in direct response to that proceeding."

 

This content was created by Oil Price Information Service, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. OPIS is run independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

 

--Reporting by Sang Ah Lee, slee@opisnet.com; Editing by Mei-Hwen Wong, mwong@opisnet.com

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

May 12, 2026 03:53 ET (07:53 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment