MW The blowout jobs report is bad news for stocks - but it shouldn't force the Fed's hand on interest rates
By Vlad Signorelli
Rate hikes now will choke off the critical investments needed to lower prices
The Fed shouldn't punish the economy just because hiring is hot.
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's real battle will be against the rate hawks who see a healthier economy and reach for the handcuffs.
Economies do not overheat. That is a metaphor central bankers use to justify restraining economic growth that makes them uncomfortable. The latest jobs report was exactly that test - and whether the Federal Reserve can resist reaching for the handcuffs when the data come in strong.
The data reported Friday no longer fit neatly inside the slowdown story. Manufacturing is improving. New orders are rising. Job openings have rebounded sharply. Payrolls are stabilizing. Durable goods orders have come in slightly better than expected.
The picture is mixed, not alarming. Permanent job losers are no longer rising in the same troubling way. Quits remain the missing confirmation, but that is exactly what one would expect early in a turn. Rising quits - workers voluntarily leaving jobs to pursue better opportunities - are a vote of confidence in the economy's vibrancy. Workers usually need proof before they cast that vote.
The May employment report delivered precisely that test. Nonfarm payrolls surged by 172,000, smashing expectations of just 88,000, while the U-3 unemployment rate held steady at 4.3%. Average hourly earnings came in exactly in line. The bond market's knee-jerk reaction was immediate and predictable - a sharp spike in the 10-year Treasury BX:TMUBMUSD10Y yield. That would be the wrong lesson.
Importantly, hourly earnings came in exactly on forecast - no acceleration at all. Wages are what the market can bear. If a company pays too much, it is paying too much or not selling enough. Restrictive rate policy doesn't discipline wages; it creates a drought of revenues that squeezes margins and punishes the hiring we just saw. This is not a demand-driven blowout report. It is evidence that firms are successfully adding capacity and hiring into a labor market that is finally beginning to heal.
Read: The hiring recession is over - but landing a new job is much harder than it looks
The better interpretation is that the expansion may be growing a new leg.
The strongest evidence is not that demand is running wild. It is that the economy may be trying to repair its supply side. The May ISM Manufacturing data showed the sector moving further into expansion, with new orders, production, and backlogs all improving. Job openings jumped. Hiring data have firmed. The factory sector no longer looks like dead weight. It looks like a sector attempting to reaccelerate after a long period of policy-driven restraint.
A firmer labor market should not strengthen the case for renewed tightening.
That distinction matters. Many of the price complaints in business surveys are classic supply constraints: tariffs; Persian Gulf energy volatility; construction materials; tight skilled labor and AI-driven bottlenecks. These are real problems. They raise costs, squeeze margins, and frustrate managers. They can look ugly in inflation data.
But higher interest rates do not fix them quickly or efficiently. Today's report is Exhibit A: a healthier economy that the old Fed framework instinctively wants to punish.
The Fed cannot hike its way into more energy, more factories, more electricians, more transformers or more AI capacity. Restrictive policy does the opposite. It raises the cost of capital, delays investment and chokes off the very capacity needed to relieve bottlenecks. Rate hikes do not solve supply constraints; they ration the investment needed to overcome them.
That is the danger. A firmer labor market should not strengthen the case for renewed tightening. The policy error would be to see a healthier economy and call it a problem.
The next FOMC meeting is June 17. Markets currently see zero probability of a rate hike then - but more than 80% by December. That tilt is unwarranted. Tariffs are a one-time price adjustment, not a wage-price spiral. The Iran conflict is an energy supply shock, not a monetary phenomenon. The Fed should not let either become a pretext for tightening into a supply-constrained recovery.
The right response is more production and more productivity growth, not scarcer credit.
This is where new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's larger break with the old Fed comes into focus. Warsh's confirmation testimony cut through the fog: inflation is not an act of God, a shipping-container mystery, or a Gulf headline. Inflation is a policy choice, and the Fed is accountable for it. Supply shocks distort prices. They can hurt households, squeeze margins, and show up ugly in survey data. But the Fed determines whether those shocks become sustained monetary inflation.
That distinction is the whole ballgame.
Tariffs raise import costs. Persian Gulf tensions lift energy prices. Tight labor markets push up wages. These are supply-side pressures. Higher interest rates do not fix any of them - and by raising the cost of capital, they discourage the investment that would, such as automation. The right response is more production and more productivity growth, not scarcer credit.
The old Fed reflex treats growth as suspicious. Better production risks "excess demand." Stronger hiring becomes a warning sign. A falling unemployment rate becomes evidence that the central bank has more work to do. That framework has a grim internal logic: when the economy improves, policy must restrain it before workers and businesses get too comfortable.
That is not monetary discipline. It is managed stagnation.
The economy may be healing faster than the Fed's old framework was built to explain.
The Fed should care about inflation. It should defend the purchasing power of the dollar. It should not confuse every relative-price shock with monetary inflation or every labor-market improvement with "overheating." A central bank that cannot distinguish supply repair from excess demand will keep prescribing the same medicine for different diseases.
The latest jobs report exposed exactly that tension. A stronger-than-expected payrolls print challenged the recession-cuts narrative. But it did not prove that the Fed needs to tighten again. It suggested something more important: the economy may be healing faster than the Fed's old framework was built to explain.
The missing piece remains quits. Workers have not yet fully regained confidence. That is why the coming months matter. If job openings remain firm, manufacturing continues to improve and payrolls stabilize, quits may turn next. That would confirm that the labor market is not merely avoiding deterioration; it is beginning to heal.
Warsh's real battle will be against the rate hawks who would turn supply constraints into an argument for stagflationary policy. They see bottlenecks and prescribe capital scarcity. They see a healthier economy and reach for the handcuffs.
The Fed cannot hike its way into more supply. It can only make the supply response more expensive.
That is why this morning's report matters. It shows that the expansion is growing a new leg. The Fed's job is to get out of the way.
Vlad Signorelli is president of Bretton Woods Research, a macroeconomic forecasting firm.
Read: S&P 500 sees $1.8 trillion wipeout, Nasdaq tallies biggest point drop on record. Here's what investors need to know about Friday's selloff.
Also read: The Fed may already be too late in hiking rates - which is bad news for these borrowers
-Vlad Signorelli
This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
June 06, 2026 09:40 ET (13:40 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Comments