Garlinghouse vs Dimon: The CLARITY Act fight nobody’s watching

cryptonews06-05 20:30

While the crypto world fixates on price charts and the broader market bleeds, the most consequential fight for crypto’s future is happening in Senate offices and on conference stages, and it pits two ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2641597148?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-06-05 20:30","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2641597148","market":"sg","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Garlinghouse vs Dimon: The CLARITY Act fight nobody’s watching","media":"cryptonews","content":"<div>\n<p>While the crypto world fixates on price charts and the broader market bleeds, the most consequential fight for crypto’s future is happening in Senate offices and on conference stages, and it pits two ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://crypto.news/garlinghouse-vs-dimon-the-clarity-act-fight-nobodys-watching/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"crypto_news_highlight","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Garlinghouse vs Dimon: The CLARITY Act fight nobody’s watching</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGarlinghouse vs Dimon: The CLARITY Act fight nobody’s watching\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-06-05 20:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://crypto.news/garlinghouse-vs-dimon-the-clarity-act-fight-nobodys-watching/><strong>cryptonews</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>While the crypto world fixates on price charts and the broader market bleeds, the most consequential fight for crypto’s future is happening in Senate offices and on conference stages, and it pits two ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://crypto.news/garlinghouse-vs-dimon-the-clarity-act-fight-nobodys-watching/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"XRPI","symbol_name":"1倍XRP ETF-Volatility Shares","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://crypto.news/garlinghouse-vs-dimon-the-clarity-act-fight-nobodys-watching/","article_id":"2641597148","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":{"source":"crypto_news_highlight","url":"https://crypto.news/garlinghouse-vs-dimon-the-clarity-act-fight-nobodys-watching/","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2641597148","pubTimestamp":1780662600,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"crypto_news_highlight","name":"Crypto News"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"While the crypto world fixates on price charts and the broader market bleeds, the most consequential fight for crypto’s future is happening in Senate offices and on conference stages, and it pits two of the most powerful men in finance against each other.Garlinghouse and Dimon represent the wider battle between crypto firms and traditional banks.The CLARITY Act fight centers on whether stablecoins can offer yield-like rewards.Banks fear yield-bearing stablecoins could drain deposits and weaken their funding base.On one side is Brad Garlinghouse, the CEO of Ripple, who has spent years and a landmark SEC lawsuit pushing for US crypto legislation and who put the odds of the CLARITY Act passing at 80 percent. On the other is Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan, America’s largest bank, who has said flatly that he is not satisfied with the bill as written and warned that banks “will not accept it that way.”NEW: Brad Garlinghouse marks XRP’s 14th birthday. Says it rem","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"crypto.news","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"XRPI":"1倍XRP ETF-Volatility Shares","LU1084165304.USD":"FIDELITY WORLD \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1720051108.HKD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","IE00BFXG1179.USD":"BNY MELLON U.S. EQUITY INCOME \"B\" (USD) INC","LU0787776722.HKD":"AB SELECT US EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"A\" (HKD) ACC","XRPR":"REX-OSPREY XRP ETF","LU1548497426.USD":"安联环球人工智能AT Acc","LU0170899867.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS WORLD VALUE EQUITY  \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1267930490.SGD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"AS\" (SGD) INC A","LU0859254822.USD":"T ROWE PRICE GLOBAL VALUE EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1670627923.USD":"M&G (LUX) NORTH AMERICAN DIVIDEND \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2264538146.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Global Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","IE00BHPRN162.USD":"BNY MELLON BLOCKCHAIN INNOVATION \"B\" (USD) ACC","XRPT":"2倍杠杆XRP ETF-Volatility Shares","LU2756315664.SGD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMI\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU2106854487.HKD":"ALLIANZ THEMATICA \"AMG\" (HKD) INC","LU2357627491.SGD":"TRP GLOBAL VALUE EQUITY \"AH\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU0106831901.USD":"贝莱德世界金融基金A2","IE00BN8TJ469.HKD":"FTGF CLEARBRIDGE TACTICAL DIVIDEND INCOME \"A\" (HKD) INC","LU0234572021.USD":"高盛美国核心股票组合Acc","LU1629891620.HKD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMG2\" (H2-HKD) INC","LU0106261372.USD":"SCHRODER ISF US LARGE CAP \"A\" ACC","IE00B775SV38.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN US MULTICAP OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BLSP4239.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Tactical Dividend Income A Mdis USD Plus","LU2430703095.HKD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4\" (HKD) INC","LU0251132253.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS  GLOBAL THEMATIC OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0211327993.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2430703178.SGD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4H\" (SGDHDG) INC","BK4539":"次新股","IE00BZ1G4Q59.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE US EQUITY SUSTAINABILITY LEADER \"A\"(USD) INC (A)","BK4581":"高盛持仓","LU0320765489.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Mutual US Value A Acc SGD","LU2430703251.USD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4\" (USD) INC","LU1551013425.SGD":"Allianz Income and Growth Cl AMg2 DIS H2-SGD","LU2756315318.SGD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMG\" (SGDHDG) INC A","LU1914381329.SGD":"Allianz Best Styles Global Equity Cl ET Acc H2-SGD","LU2023250330.USD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMG\" (USD) INC","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","LU1917777945.USD":"安联专题基金Cl AT Acc","LU1720051017.SGD":"Allianz Global Artificial Intelligence AT Acc H2-SGD","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","SG9999002232.USD":"Allianz Global High Payout USD","LU1496350171.SGD":"FRANKLIN DIVERSIFIED BALANCED \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU1244550221.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET  INCOME \"A\" (USDHEDGED) INC (M)","SG9999002224.SGD":"Allianz Global High Payout SGD","LU0265550946.USD":"BGF SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL ENHANCED EQUITY YIELD \"A5\" (USD) INC","LU0417517546.SGD":"Allianz US Equity Cl AT Acc SGD","LU0149725797.USD":"汇丰美国股市经济规模基金","BK4516":"特朗普概念","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","LU2242649171.HKD":"FIDELITY FUNDS GLOBAL THEMATIC OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU2462157665.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (USD) INC","LU1244550494.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET INCOME \"A\" (USDHEDGED) ACC","LU0964807845.USD":"ALLIANZ INCOME & GROWTH \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0070302665.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL U.S. VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0211328371.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A\" (MDIS) (USD)   INC","LU2211815571.USD":"ALLIANZ POSITIVE CHANGE \"AT\" (USD) ACC","COYY":"GRANITESHARES YIELDBOOST COIN ETF","LU0868494617.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - US TOTAL YIELD SUSTAINABLE \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU1032466523.USD":"高盛全球多资产收益组合Acc","IE00BYXW3230.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"AA\" (USD) ACC","LU1974910355.USD":"Allianz Thematica Cl AMg DIS USD","JPM":"摩根大通","LU2417539215.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL INCOME \"AMF\" (USD) INC","BK4595":"比特币概念","ICOI":"Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF","LU1670628061.USD":"M&G (LUX) NORTH AMERICAN DIVIDEND \"A\" (USD) INC","LU2237443382.USD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A MIncA USD","LU2244417387.USD":"FIDELITY SUSTAINABLE US EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2213496289.HKD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","LU2237443549.SGD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A MIncA SGD-H","LU0496365809.HKD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (HKD) INC (Q)","LU2237443895.HKD":"abrdn SICAV I -  GLOBAL DYNAMIC DIVIDEND \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0310799852.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton Global Equity Income A MDIS SGD","LU1894683348.USD":"AMUNDI FUNDS US EQUITY RESEARCH VALUE \"A2\" (USD) INC","LU2237443622.USD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A Acc USD","LU2023250504.SGD":"Allianz Thematica Cl AMg DIS H2-SGD","LU0265550359.USD":"BGF SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL ENHANCED EQUITY YIELD \"A2\" (USD) ACC","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","XXRP":"2倍做多XRP ETF-Teucrium","LU2237443978.SGD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A Acc SGD-H","LU0323591593.USD":"SCHRODER ISF QEP GLOBAL QUALITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0820561909.HKD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AM\" (HKD) INC","LU2357305700.SGD":"Allianz Global Artificial Intelligence ET H2-SGD","LU0238689110.USD":"贝莱德环球动力股票基金","IE00BDRTCR15.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"ADC\" (USD) INC A","LU1119994496.HKD":"FIDELITY WORLD \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU1116320737.USD":"BGF SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL ENHANCED EQUITY YIELD \"A6\" (USD) INC","LU0976567544.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton Global Income A Mdis SGD-H1","JPO":"JPM期权收益策略ETF-YieldMax","LU1366192091.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY PLUS \"AM\" (USD) INC","IE0034235303.USD":"PINEBRIDGE US RESEARCH ENHANCED CORE EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2360107671.USD":"BGF FINTECH \"A4\" (USD) INC","LU0256863902.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"AT\" (USD) ACC","JPX":"Defiance Daily Target 2X Long JPM ETF","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","UXRP":"Proshares Ultra XRP ETF","LU2054465674.USD":"UBS (LUX) KEY SELEC SICAV DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION T \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","BK4596":"哈里斯概念","IE00B1XK9C88.USD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1162221912.USD":"FRANKLIN INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0048584097.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS  GLOBAL THEMATIC OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0640476718.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) US CONTRARIAN CORE EQ \"AU\" (USD) ACC","LU0689472784.USD":"安联收益及增长基金Cl AM AT Acc","LU0868494708.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - US TOTAL YIELD SUSTAINABLE \"P\" (USD) INC","LU0215105999.USD":"SCHRODER ISF GLOBAL EQUITY \"A\" ACC","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4588":"碎股","BK4600":"加密货币概念","LU1280957306.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) US CONTRARIAN CORE EQUITIES \"AUP\" (USD) INC","COIA":"ProShares Ultra Coin ETF","IE00BKDWB100.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5H\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU1261432733.SGD":"Fidelity World A-ACC-SGD","LU0267386448.USD":"FIDELITY FIRST ALL COUNTRY WORLD \"A\" (USD) INC","LU1116320901.HKD":"BGF SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL ENHANCED EQUITY YIELD \"A6\" (HKD) INC","IE00B1BXHZ80.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Appreciation A Acc USD","LU0203347892.USD":"SCHRODER ISF QEP GLOBAL ACTIVE VALLUE \"A\" (USD)  INC AV","COIG":"2倍做多COIN ETF- Leverage Shares","LU2592432038.USD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1064131342.USD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Global Absolute Alpha A Acc USD","IE0034235295.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","LU1988902786.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS GLOBAL ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0882574139.USD":"富达环球消费行业基金A ACC","IE0034235188.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL FOCUS EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","COII":"REX COIN Growth& Income ETF","LU1894683264.USD":"AMUNDI FUNDS US EQUITY RESEARCH VALUE \"A2\" (USD) ACC","FIAT":"做空COIN期权收益策略ETF-YieldMax","IE00BJTD4V19.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN US LONG SHORT EQUITY \"A1\" (USD) ACC","IE00BDCRKT87.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"ADC\" (USD) INC","COIO":"2倍上限加速COIN ETF-Leverage Shares","LU0203345920.USD":"SCHRODER ISF QEP GLB ACT. VL \"A\" (USD) ACC","JPMO":"JPM期权收益策略ETF-YieldMax","LU1145028129.USD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AQ\" (USD) INC","COIW":"COIN周配息ETF-Roundhill","LU0971096721.USD":"富达环球金融服务 A","LU2237443465.HKD":"abrdn SICAV I -  GLOBAL DYNAMIC DIVIDEND \"A\" (HKD) INC","LU2236285917.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL INCOME \"AMG\" (USD) INC","LU1496350502.SGD":"FRANKLIN DIVERSIFIED DYNAMIC \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU0211331839.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL GLB DISCOVERY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2505996681.GBP":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4H\" (GBPHDG) INC","IE00BLSP4452.SGD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Tactical Dividend Income A Mdis SGD-H Plus","LU2746668974.SGD":"MANULIFE DYNAMIC LEADERS \"AA\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2023250843.SGD":"Allianz Thematica Cl AT Acc H2-SGD","IE00BJLML261.HKD":"HSBC GLOBAL EQUITY INDEX \"HCH\" (HKD) ACC","LU2505996509.AUD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4H\" (AUDHDG) INC","IE00B3S45H60.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Multicap Opportunities A Acc SGD-H","BK4566":"资本集团","LU1861559042.SGD":"日兴方舟颠覆性创新基金B SGD","LU0320765646.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Income A MDIS SGD-H1","LU2552382215.SGD":"WELLINGTON US BRAND POWER \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2456880835.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL INCOME \"AT\" (USD) ACC","LU0942090050.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - US TOTAL YIELD SUSTAINABLE \"P\" (USD)  INC","LU0820561818.USD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金Cl AM DIS","LU2552382058.USD":"WELLINGTON US BRAND POWER \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1363072403.SGD":"Fidelity Global Financial Services A-ACC-SGD","XRPK":"T-REX 2x Long XRP Daily Target ETF","LU1551013342.USD":"Allianz Income and Growth Cl AMg2 DIS USD","LU0208291251.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL U.S. VALUE \"A\" (USD) INC","LU2552382132.HKD":"WELLINGTON US BRAND POWER \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU1668664300.SGD":"Blackrock World Financials A2 SGD-H","IE00BJTD4N35.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Long Short Equity A1  Acc SGD-H","LU2746668461.USD":"MANULIFE DYNAMIC LEADERS \"AA\" (USD) ACC","BK4504":"桥水持仓","LU2381873111.SGD":"BGF SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL EQUITY HIGH INCOME \"A6\" (SGDHDG) INC","CONI":"2倍做空COIN ETF-GraniteShares","LU0345769128.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BBT3K403.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE TACTICAL DIVIDEND INCOME \"A(USD) ACC","BK4112":"金融交易所和数据","CONL":"2倍做多COIN ETF-GraniteShares","LU0943347566.SGD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金AM H2-SGD","IE000M9KFDE8.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN US LARGE CAP VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4207":"综合性银行","LU0187121727.USD":"FIDELITY SUSTAINABLE US EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","CONX":"Direxion Daily COIN Bull 2X ETF","LU0820562030.AUD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMH2\" (AUDHDG) H2 INC","LU1861558580.USD":"日兴方舟颠覆性创新基金B","LU0345769631.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","LU1244550577.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Global Multi-Asset Income A (Mdis) SGD-H1","LU1861217088.USD":"贝莱德金融科技A2","CONY":"COIN期权收益策略ETF-YieldMax","LU0211326839.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (USD) INC","IE00BKVL7J92.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Equity Sustainability Leaders A Acc USD","LU0345770308.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL STRATEGIC EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1861220207.SGD":"Blackrock FinTech A2 SGD-H","IE00BWXC8680.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5\" (SGD) ACC","LU0006306889.USD":"SCHRODER ISF US LARGE CAP \"A\" (USD) INC AV","LU0345770993.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL STRATEGIC EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0211326755.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0683600562.USD":"AB SELECT US EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC"},"translate_title":"加林豪斯vs戴蒙：《清晰法案》之战无人观看","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"JPMO":0.6,"CONL":0.6,"COIW":0.6,"JPO":0.6,"CONX":0.6,"COIG":0.6,"XRPR":0.6,"XRPI":0.6,"XRPT":0.6,"JPX":0.6,"COIO":0.6,"UXRP":0.6,"XRPK":0.6,"COII":0.6,"JPM":1.94,"CONI":0.6,"COIA":0.6,"XXRP":0.6,"CONY":0.6,"COYY":0.6,"FIAT":0.6,"ICOI":0.6,"COIN":1.85},"content_text":"While the crypto world fixates on price charts and the broader market bleeds, the most consequential fight for crypto’s future is happening in Senate offices and on conference stages, and it pits two of the most powerful men in finance against each other. \n\n\nSummary\n\n\n\nGarlinghouse and Dimon represent the wider battle between crypto firms and traditional banks.\nThe CLARITY Act fight centers on whether stablecoins can offer yield-like rewards.\nBanks fear yield-bearing stablecoins could drain deposits and weaken their funding base.\nA compromise could let crypto claim regulatory clarity while banks keep stablecoin yield restricted.\n\n\n\nOn one side is Brad Garlinghouse, the CEO of Ripple, who has spent years and a landmark SEC lawsuit pushing for US crypto legislation and who put the odds of the CLARITY Act passing at 80 percent. On the other is Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan, America’s largest bank, who has said flatly that he is not satisfied with the bill as written and warned that banks “will not accept it that way.” \nThe CLARITY Act is the crypto industry’s most important legislative priority, the bill that would finally define the legal status of digital assets in the US. Whether it passes, and what it looks like if it does, comes down in large part to a power struggle between the crypto industry that wants it and the banking industry that fears what it would unleash. This piece lays out who these two men are, what they are actually fighting over, why the fight matters far beyond their companies, and how it is likely to resolve.\n\nJUST IN: Senator Lummis says work continues on the Clarity Act to ensure America writes the rules for digital assets. Bipartisan bill will protect consumers https://t.co/NFsjGXWGUB pic.twitter.com/mYPg8x3y5N— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) June 4, 2026\n\nThe two men and what they represent\nTo understand the fight, you have to understand that Garlinghouse and Dimon are not just two executives with different opinions. Each represents an entire industry’s interests, and their clash is a proxy for the larger war between crypto and traditional banking.\nBrad Garlinghouse has been the public face of crypto’s fight for US regulatory legitimacy. As CEO of Ripple, he led the company through a multi-year SEC lawsuit over whether XRP was an unregistered security, a case that became a rallying point for the entire industry. Ripple’s partial victory established important precedent, and Garlinghouse emerged as one of the most prominent advocates for clear federal crypto rules. He has been openly bullish on the CLARITY Act, at one point putting the odds of passage by a spring deadline at 80 percent, and Ripple has built an end-to-end institutional infrastructure betting that regulatory clarity will bring banks on-chain. Garlinghouse represents the crypto industry’s core argument: give us clear rules, and we will build the future of finance inside the US rather than offshore.\n\nNEW: Brad Garlinghouse marks XRP’s 14th birthday. Says it remains the honor of a lifetime to be part of the XRP family pic.twitter.com/Rh9DXYpbqS— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) June 3, 2026\n\nJamie Dimon represents the incumbent. As CEO of JPMorgan Chase for nearly two decades, he runs the largest bank in the United States and is arguably the most influential voice in traditional finance. Dimon has a long and complicated history with crypto, having once called Bitcoin a fraud before his bank built blockchain infrastructure and began offering crypto services. But on the CLARITY Act, his position is sharp and clear: he is not satisfied with the current text, he has criticized specific provisions, and he has warned that the banking industry will not accept the bill as written. When Dimon speaks on financial regulation, senators listen, because the banking lobby is one of the most powerful forces in Washington and JPMorgan sits at its center.\nSo this is not a personality spat. It is the crypto industry’s chief evangelist versus the banking industry’s most powerful figure, fighting over a bill that would redraw the boundary between their two worlds. The specifics of what they are fighting over reveal exactly what is at stake.\nWhat they’re actually fighting over\nThe core of the dispute is not the whole bill. It is one provision: whether stablecoins can pay yield. That single question is where the crypto and banking interests collide most directly, and it is the issue Dimon keeps returning to.\nA stablecoin that pays yield, effectively interest on the balance you hold, is a powerful product. For crypto firms, it would be a way to attract enormous deposits by offering returns that compete with or beat traditional savings accounts. For banks, that is precisely the nightmare. Banks fund their entire business on deposits, the cheap money customers park with them, which they lend out at higher rates. If yield-bearing stablecoins can pull those deposits out of the banking system and into crypto-issued dollar tokens, banks lose their cheapest funding source. Dimon’s objection is, at its heart, a defense of the bank deposit base against a new competitor.\nThe CLARITY Act’s drafters tried to thread this needle with a compromise. The text that emerged would prohibit stablecoin yield that is the “functional or economic equivalent” of what banks offer on deposits, while allowing “bona fide” transactions and certain activity-based rewards. In other words, crypto firms could keep some reward programs but could not simply pay interest on balances the way a bank does. This compromise, negotiated with White House involvement and shepherded by Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks, was meant to give each side something.\nIt satisfied no one fully, which is why the fight continues. Dimon criticized the framework anyway, taking aim at Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong in the process, and argued the draft could fail because it lets crypto firms offer interest-like products without being regulated like banks, while doing too little on anti-money-laundering rules and consumer protections. From the banking side, members of the American Bankers Association reportedly flooded Senate offices with more than 8,000 letters arguing the compromise was too friendly to crypto. From the crypto side, the worry is the opposite: that the restrictions go too far and neuter one of the most promising stablecoin products. Garlinghouse, by contrast, has taken a pragmatic line, suggesting Ripple is positioned to thrive regardless of exactly how the yield question resolves because the company is so far ahead on infrastructure. That posture, confident and adaptable, contrasts sharply with Dimon’s defensive opposition, and it captures the difference between a challenger who wants the game to start and an incumbent who fears the new rules.\nWhy this fight matters beyond the two companies\nIt would be easy to dismiss this as a clash between one crypto company and one bank. That would badly understate what is riding on it, because the outcome shapes the regulatory environment for the entire digital-asset industry and, by extension, the price trajectory of major tokens.\nThe CLARITY Act is widely viewed as crypto’s single most important legislative priority. It would establish the first comprehensive federal framework for digital assets, finally resolving whether tokens fall under the SEC or the CFTC and replacing years of regulation-by-enforcement with clear rules for issuers, exchanges, and investors. For XRP specifically, passage would write its commodity classification permanently into law, green-lighting US banks to adopt XRP-based settlement and opening the door to a fuller range of ETF products. For the broader industry, regulatory certainty is the thing that institutional capital has been waiting for, the unlock that could bring sidelined money into the market and keep crypto businesses operating in the US rather than fleeing to friendlier jurisdictions.\n\n\n\n\n\n                You might also like:\n            \n\n                Pi Network just hit a new all-time low            \n\nThat is why the Garlinghouse-Dimon fight is so consequential. The stablecoin-yield provision is not a side issue that can be quietly resolved; it is the sticking point that could sink the entire bill or delay it past the point of passage. If Dimon and the banking lobby succeed in either blocking the bill or forcing yield restrictions so tight that the compromise collapses, crypto loses its most important legislative win in a year when the market is already weak. If Garlinghouse and the crypto industry prevail and the bill passes in a form they can live with, it could be the catalyst that reframes the second half of 2026. The fight between two CEOs is, in effect, a fight over whether the entire industry gets its regulatory foundation this cycle.\nThere is also a deeper irony worth naming. JPMorgan’s own analysts have warned that the CLARITY Act is running out of time before the midterm elections, even as JPMorgan’s own CEO is part of why it is stalling. The bank is simultaneously diagnosing the bill’s poor odds and contributing to them. That tension captures how traditional finance approaches crypto in 2026: building crypto infrastructure and offering crypto services with one hand while lobbying to constrain the rules with the other. Dimon is not anti-crypto in the way he once was. He is pro-bank, and where crypto threatens banks, he fights it.\nThe twist: the banks might win even if the bill passes\nHere is the part that makes the fight more subtle than a simple win-or-lose contest, and it is the detail most coverage misses. Even if the CLARITY Act passes and crypto claims victory, the banking industry may get the substantive outcome it actually wants.\nThe reason lies in what happens to capital if passive stablecoin yield is restricted, as the current draft intends. JPMorgan’s own analysts have pointed out that effective restrictions on passive stablecoin yield would push idle crypto cash toward alternatives: tokenized Treasuries, digital money-market funds, and tokenized deposits. Those are products that flow back toward regulated, bank-friendly, Treasury-backed instruments rather than into yield-bearing stablecoins issued by crypto-native firms. In other words, the yield restriction that Dimon is fighting for does not just protect bank deposits; it channels crypto capital into the kinds of products banks and traditional asset managers control.\nSo the real outcome of the fight may not be a clean crypto win or a clean banking win. It may be a bill that passes with the crypto industry celebrating the regulatory clarity it has wanted for years, while the banking industry quietly secures the provision that matters most to it, the one that keeps yield-bearing stablecoins from becoming a deposit-draining competitor. Garlinghouse gets his framework. Dimon gets his protection. The headline reads as a crypto victory, and the fine print reads as a banking victory, and both can plausibly claim they won.\nThis is why the fight is worth watching even though almost no one is watching it. The price charts that dominate attention are downstream of exactly this kind of regulatory detail. Whether stablecoins can pay yield determines where billions of dollars of crypto capital flows, which products win, and which industry captures the next phase of on-chain finance. Two CEOs are fighting over a single provision, and the resolution of that fight will shape the structure of the digital-asset economy for years, regardless of what Bitcoin does next week.\nHow it likely resolves\nPulling the threads together, the most probable path is messier than either side would prefer, and it runs through the same calendar pressure squeezing everything else in crypto policy.\nThe bill cleared the Senate Banking Committee but still needs 60 votes in the full Senate, reconciliation with the House version, and a presidential signature, all before a midterm-election calendar that effectively empties Washington in August and turns attention to campaigns thereafter. That leaves a narrow window, and the stablecoin-yield fight between the Garlinghouse and Dimon camps is the most likely thing to consume the time the bill does not have. The crypto investment firm Galaxy has put the odds of passage this year at roughly 50-50 or lower, with the uncertainty coming not from any single issue but from the number of unresolved questions that must be settled in sequence under severe time pressure.\n\nLATEST: Senate set to resume Clarity Act debate this week following Memorial Day recess https://t.co/NFsjGXXeK9 pic.twitter.com/dTcog5wzAz— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) June 2, 2026\n\nThe realistic outcomes are three. The bill passes this summer in a form built on the existing yield compromise, handing crypto its regulatory framework while preserving the restrictions banks want, the “both sides claim victory” scenario. The bill slips past the August recess and dies for the year, a loss for Garlinghouse and the crypto industry and a quiet win for Dimon and the banks who benefit from continued delay. Or it limps into a post-election lame-duck session with diminished odds. Each path runs directly through the yield fight, which is why this single provision, and the two men championing the opposing sides of it, holds outsized power over the whole effort.\nFor anyone trying to track crypto’s regulatory future, the signal to watch is not the daily token price but the movement on stablecoin yield. If Garlinghouse’s pragmatic confidence proves justified and the compromise holds, expect a bill and a potential market catalyst. If Dimon’s opposition hardens and the banking lobby keeps the pressure on, expect delay and disappointment. The fight nobody is watching is the one that determines whether crypto gets the foundation it has been building toward, and the two men at its center are fighting not just for their companies but for which industry writes the rules of on-chain finance. That is a fight worth watching, even when the charts are screaming for attention.\nThis article is for informational purposes and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. The figures and analysis described reflect data available as of June 5, 2026. Always do your own research and consult with qualified financial professionals before making investment decisions.\n\n\n\n\n\n                Read more:\n            \n\n                Bitcoin purity, markets or upgrades? Saylor names four camps","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"tenantId":"TBGLOBAL","deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.43.1","shortVersion":"4.43.1","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2641597148","isCrawlerRequest":true}