MW There's a ticking time bomb under the Paramount-Warner Bros. deal. Here's what could set it off.
By Lukas I. Alpert
Paramount has agreed to pay an extra $627.5 million for every quarter past Sept. 30 that the deal doesn't close. Looming regulatory pressures are pushing that potential outcome into focus.
The merger of Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery has been met with resistance from many in Hollywood - but the real threat will come from additional costs Paramount could incur if regulators slow down the deal.
When Paramount Skydance agreed to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery for $110 billion, it was counting on obtaining swift approval for the deal from the Trump administration.
But underneath the complex and expensive megamerger sits a potential time bomb that could be triggered if regulators elsewhere create significant roadblocks.
Baked into the deal is a "ticking fee," whereby Paramount $(PSKY)$ has agreed to pay an additional 25 cents per share for every quarter the transaction doesn't close beyond Sept. 30. That would amount to an additional $627.5 million every three months.
With regulatory scrutiny heating up in several U.S. states - most significantly California - as well as in Europe, the chances of the deal not closing before the deadline have been rising, potentially making an already highly leveraged transaction even more expensive.
Analysts have long viewed the short deadline for deal closure, which was agreed to in February, as aggressive. They've also seen the leverage level as a key issue: The combined companies would emerge with $79 billion in debt on the books.
"Leverage is our top concern," Raymond James media analyst Ric Prentiss wrote in a note to clients. "Any further increase in leverage or inability to service debt could result in downgraded credit ratings, and liquidity or covenant issues."
A representative for Paramount did not immediately return a message seeking comment. A spokesperson for Warner Bros. Discovery $(WBD)$ declined to comment.
Paramount's principal owners, David Ellison and his father, Oracle $(ORCL)$ co-founder Larry Ellison, enjoy close relations with President Donald Trump, whose administration has signaled that it plans to quickly approve the deal.
Given the merger's potential impact in Hollywood, California Attorney General Rob Bonta said early on that he planned to subject the transaction to scrutiny. Last week, Bonta was reportedly close to moving ahead with filing an antitrust lawsuit to block the deal, possibly in conjunction with other states.
Bonta has said he is looking at questions about how the transaction would affect the output of movies available to theater companies, as well as the potential impact on the competitive marketplace for filmmakers, television producers and performers.
Paramount has said it plans to produce more movies once combined with WBD than the two companies have made separately. It has also insisted that the billions of dollars in synergy costs it would seek after closing the acquisition would largely come from technology upgrades, facility reductions and the implementation of artificial intelligence, rather than from job cuts.
At the same time, regulators in the European Union said they would make a decision by Sunday on whether to proceed with a probe examining the implications of the deal's backing by several Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds, among other competition concerns.
Paramount has reportedly been exploring the possibility of selling the Nickelodeon or Cartoon Network channels to address the concerns of E.U. regulators.
Meanwhile, the United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority said earlier this week that it had opened an investigation into the transaction and set an Aug. 7 deadline to decide whether to sign off on the deal or expand its probe.
Paramount has signaled that it is preparing for a legal fight in California, with both the company and Bonta reportedly assembling superstar antitrust legal teams.
The company has also reportedly been in discussions about potential concessions in the hope of satisfying Bonta's concerns and staving off a lawsuit.
But whether all of this can be achieved ahead of the Sept. 30 "ticking fee" deadline remains to be seen.
"It's all going to take some significant needle-threading," said Corey Martin, who chairs the entertainment-finance practice at law firm Granderson Des Rochers. "There are some backdoor paths to closing the deal while still litigating with the states over their concerns. But there is no way to move forward without the sign-off from regulators in Europe."
Scott N. Wagner, co-chair of the antitrust practice at law firm Bilzin Sumberg, said that if states were able to get an injunction to block the deal, it would be up to a judge as to whether the deal officially closes or not.
"Usually, they try to keep the status quo as the court process plays out, but given the financial implications if this drags on, a judge could structure it to allow the deal to close while the issues are addressed," he said. "But once that happens, it is typically very hard to undo later."
A recent deal for local television-station owner Nexstar $(NXST)$ to acquire smaller rival Tegna for $6.2 billion has found itself in similar legal limbo, after a group of states led by California sought to block the deal on antitrust grounds. A judge has issued an injunction but agreed to allow the closing of the deal to go through.
Until the issue is resolved in court, Tegna will operate as a separate unit of Nexstar but will not be fully integrated into its business.
-Lukas I. Alpert
This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
June 11, 2026 14:30 ET (18:30 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Comments