Wells Fargo Ordered to Pay Former Broker $3 Million in Arbitration Dispute, but Will Also Collect $1 Million -- Barrons.com

Dow Jones06-19

By Kenneth Corbin

An arbitration panel has ordered Wells Fargo Clearing Services to pay $3 million to a former broker who accused the firm of dismissing him in retaliation for having flagged instances of fraud. Thomas Ratliff accused Wells Fargo of defamation, libel, and interference with business relationships, among other allegations.

In the same ruling, the arbitration panel, convened by brokerage industry self-regulator Finra, awarded about $1 million in damages to Wells Fargo, which in a counterclaim had accused Ratliff of breach of contract relating to a balance that came due on promissory notes when his employment ended.

"While we appreciate the panel's decision to hold Mr. Ratliff accountable for his loan, we disagree with other findings and are considering our options," Wells Fargo says.

Ratliff's lawyer didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Ratliff alleged that Wells Fargo terminated him "on a pretextual basis" after he identified and reported the mishandling of client accounts and accused his former partner, Thomas Brandstater, of violating the terms of their succession-planning arrangement.

Brandstater was named as a respondent in the dispute and ordered to pay Ratliff just over $38,000 in compensatory damages. He didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Wells Fargo dismissed Ratliff in January 2024 "after a firm review found he submitted a referral without speaking with the client and sent email without the required disclosures," according to his record in the online database BrokerCheck. Wells Fargo said at the time that it hadn't identified any consumer harm.

Ratliff hasn't registered with another firm since then. His response to the allegations reads:

"Months after reporting instances of fraud and theft to Wells Fargo Advisors in October 2022 regarding a partner's actions, I was subjected to an independent internal review for baseless violations unrelated to sales practices, without any harm inflicted on customers or any customer complaints. Despite providing evidence refuting the accusations, I was terminated. My concerns about the theft and fraud remain unaddressed."

The Finra panel called for the reason for Ratliff's termination listed in his public record to be changed to "other" and that Wells Fargo's comment describing the allegations be deleted.

Write to advisor.editors@barrons.com

This content was created by Barron's, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. Barron's is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

June 18, 2026 13:16 ET (17:16 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment