What Is BIP-110 and Why Is It Dividing the Bitcoin Community?

Decrypt07-15 19:43

In brief BIP-110 would restrict several methods used to embed non-financial data in Bitcoin transactions. Supporters say the proposal would reduce blockchain spam, while critics argue it would ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2651495466?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"https://img.decrypt.co/insecure/rs:fit:3840:0:0:0/plain/https://cdn.decrypt.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/bitcoin-crack-decrypt-style-gID_7.jpg@webp","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-07-15 19:43","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2651495466","market":"nz","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"What Is BIP-110 and Why Is It Dividing the Bitcoin Community?","media":"Decrypt","content":"<div>\n<p>In brief\nBIP-110 would restrict several methods used to embed non-financial data in Bitcoin transactions.\nSupporters say the proposal would reduce blockchain spam, while critics argue it would ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://decrypt.co//373577/what-is-bip-110-why-dividing-bitcoin-community\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"decrypt_highlight","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What Is BIP-110 and Why Is It Dividing the Bitcoin Community?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat Is BIP-110 and Why Is It Dividing the Bitcoin Community?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-07-15 19:43 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://decrypt.co//373577/what-is-bip-110-why-dividing-bitcoin-community><strong>Decrypt</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In brief\nBIP-110 would restrict several methods used to embed non-financial data in Bitcoin transactions.\nSupporters say the proposal would reduce blockchain spam, while critics argue it would ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://decrypt.co//373577/what-is-bip-110-why-dividing-bitcoin-community\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"CBOY","symbol_name":"Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://decrypt.co//373577/what-is-bip-110-why-dividing-bitcoin-community","article_id":"2651495466","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":["https://img.decrypt.co/insecure/rs:fit:3840:0:0:0/plain/https://cdn.decrypt.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/bitcoin-crack-decrypt-style-gID_7.jpg@webp"],"rights":{"source":"decrypt_highlight","url":"https://decrypt.co//373577/what-is-bip-110-why-dividing-bitcoin-community","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2651495466","pubTimestamp":1784115790,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"decrypt_highlight","name":"Decrypt"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"A proposal to restrict non-financial data on Bitcoin has split prominent developers, miners, and industry leaders ahead of a key activation deadline, reopening one of the network's biggest governance debates since the Blocksize Wars.","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"decrypt.co","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"CBOY":"Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July","QBF":"Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly","BITY":"Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF","BTCW":"比特币ETF-Wisdom Tree","CBXJ":"Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January","BETE":"等权重比特币&以太币期货ETF-ProShares","BFJL":"FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July","BTCZ":"T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF","BETH":"比特币&以太币期货ETF-ProShares","BITB":"比特币ETF-Bitwise","CBXO":"Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October","XBTY":"GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF","BTC":"Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust","CBOA":"Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April","CBXY":"Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July","BTCC":"Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF","BITI":"1倍做空比特币期货ETF-Proshares","CBOJ":"Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January","MAXI":"比特币期货ETF-Simplify","IBIT":"比特币ETF-iShares","CBTA":"Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF – April","BTCI":"NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF","SBIT":"2倍做空比特币期货ETF-Proshares","BTF":"比特币&以太币期货ETF-CoinShares","BITO":"比特币期货ETF-ProShares","GBTC":"比特币ETF-Grayscale","CBTJ":"Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January","MNRS":"GRAYSCALE BITCOIN MINERS ETF","BPI":"Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF","BRRR":"比特币ETF-CoinShares","BTCL":"T-REX 2X LONG BITCOIN DAILY TARGET ETF","BCCC":"Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF","DEFI":"比特币期货ETF-Hashdex","ARKB":"比特币ETF-21Shares","CBOO":"Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October","DFII":"FT Cboe Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF","CBTO":"Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October","HODL":"比特币ETF-VanEck","BTCO":"比特币ETF-Invesco Galaxy","BITU":"2倍做多比特币期货ETF-Proshares","BAGY":"Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF","YBTC":"比特币看涨期权ETF-Roundhill","BITX":"2倍比特币期货ETF-Volatility Shares","EZBC":"比特币ETF-Franklin","CBTY":"Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July","FBTC":"比特币ETF-Fidelity","CBXA":"Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF – April","BTRN":"比特币期货ETF-Global X"},"translate_title":"什么是BIP-110，为什么它会分裂比特币社区？","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"CBTO":0.6,"MAXI":0.6,"BAGY":0.6,"HODL":0.6,"ARKB":0.6,"BTCC":0.6,"BITI":0.6,"BFJL":0.6,"CBOA":0.6,"BTCO":0.6,"DEFI":0.6,"BTCL":0.6,"QBF":0.6,"SBIT":0.6,"BITU":0.6,"CBOY":0.6,"CBTJ":0.6,"GBTC":0.6,"IBIT":0.6,"YBTC":0.6,"CBXO":0.6,"CBXY":0.6,"EZBC":0.6,"BETH":0.6,"BETE":0.6,"CBOO":0.6,"BTCZ":0.6,"BTF":0.6,"CBXA":0.6,"BITY":0.6,"CBTY":0.6,"CBTA":0.6,"MNRS":0.6,"CBXJ":0.6,"BRRR":0.6,"BCCC":0.6,"BTC":0.6,"BTCI":0.6,"DFII":0.6,"FBTC":0.6,"XBTY":0.6,"BITX":0.6,"BITB":0.6,"CBOJ":0.6,"BITO":0.6,"BTCW":0.6,"BTRN":0.6,"BPI":0.6},"content_text":"In brief\nBIP-110 would restrict several methods used to embed non-financial data in Bitcoin transactions.\nSupporters say the proposal would reduce blockchain spam, while critics argue it would invalidate legitimate transactions and risk a chain split.\nDespite attracting little miner support, BIP-110 has become one of Bitcoin's biggest governance debates in years.\nA proposal to change Bitcoin's consensus rules has divided developers, miners, companies, and users over how the network should evolve and who gets to decide.The dispute centers around Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110, or BIP-110. If implemented, BIP-110 would temporarily restrict several methods used to embed arbitrary data in Bitcoin transactions.Supporters say the proposal would reduce blockchain spam and reinforce Bitcoin's role as money, while critics argue it would reject valid transactions and could split the network.The debate has drawn reactions from Bitcoin developer Luke Dashjr, Blockstream CEO Adam Back, Strategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor, Casa Chief Security Officer Jameson Lopp, and Bitcoin advocate Samson Mow.“There are 110 things more dangerous to Bitcoin than spam. BIP 110 turns a spam dispute into a consensus change that would invalidate some currently valid, fee-paying transactions,” Saylor wrote on X. “That precedent is the danger. We should save our energy for threats that really matter.”What would BIP-110 change?Bitcoin transactions can include more than payments. They can also carry text, images, token metadata, and other information through transaction scripts and witness data.As a soft fork, BIP-110 would tighten Bitcoin's consensus rules by limiting several techniques used to embed that data. The proposal would limit most new transaction outputs to 34 bytes, restore an 83-byte limit for OP_RETURN outputs, cap certain witness elements at 256 bytes, and temporarily restrict several Taproot features commonly used for inscriptions. (Inscriptions are to Bitcoin what NFTs and other similar assets are to blockchain networks like Ethereum and Solana.)Critics argue that BIP-110 would invalidate some transactions that are currently valid under Bitcoin's consensus rules and set a precedent for future protocol changes. In a February blog post, Jameson Lopp argued that BIP-110 would weaken two of Bitcoin's defining properties: censorship resistance and predictability.“Bitcoin's strength lies in its censorship resistance and predictability,” Loop wrote. “BIP-110 signals that the protocol can be altered to censor subjectively ‘undesirable’ transactions, eroding its image as permissionless programmable money.”BIP-110's mandatory signaling period begins in August, and so far, only 1% of miners have shown support for BIP-110, according to the proposal's monitoring dashboard.Blockstream CEO Adam Back argued that Bitcoin's decentralized design prevents users from imposing their preferences on others and that its technical consensus process is intentionally resistant to change. While supporters are free to create their own fork, he wrote, \"Bitcoin won't be joining it.\"“Now the tough pill, which is unfortunately true,” Back wrote on X. “If you won't listen to reason, educate yourself, learn, the same radical freedom applies to you: your permissionless recourse is to club together and create a fork.”The debate began with OrdinalsThe current dispute dates back to early 2023 with the launch of Ordinals, a protocol created by Bitcoin developer Casey Rodarmor that allows images, text, video, and other digital content to be inscribed directly onto individual satoshis, the smallest unit of Bitcoin. Ordinals use features introduced by Bitcoin's SegWit and Taproot upgrades to create NFT-like assets directly on the Bitcoin blockchain.As Ordinals and BRC-20 tokens gained popularity, demand for Bitcoin block space increased, pushing transaction fees higher. Supporters say those fees generated additional revenue for miners and strengthened Bitcoin's long-term security.However, critics, including Dashjr, have argued that inscriptions exploit the Bitcoin network, describing them as spam rather than legitimate financial transactions.Mow urges consensusIn an essay posted to X on Tuesday titled The Bitcoin Alliance, Samson Mow argued that Bitcoin participants should think of themselves as an alliance rather than a community, with developers, miners, companies, educators, and users each contributing to the network in different ways.“During the Blocksize War, there was never this ‘if you're not with us, you're against us’ mentality on our side,” he wrote. “The small block camp never had to coerce anyone to join. We just all \"got it\" and were confident in our position.”For reference, the Blocksize Wars (2015–2017) centered on whether Bitcoin should increase its 1 MB block size limit to process more transactions in a single block on the network. In the end, the \"small block\" camp won out, with \"big blockers\" forking off to create Bitcoin Cash in 2017 and later Bitcoin SV in 2018.Mow wrote that he shares concerns about blockchain spam but opposes BIP-110 because he believes protocol changes require broad consensus. Mow also criticized Bitcoin Core developers for their handling of recent OP_RETURN policy changes, arguing that both sides contributed to escalating the dispute.“The way they handled the OP_RETURN change was full of stupid mistakes, from banning people on GitHub to the ninja ACKs,” he wrote. “Any normal person could have predicted the reaction from the plebs. People store their time and value in Bitcoin. Anything that appears to threaten that will get people up in arms.”Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.Your EmailGet it!Get it!","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":false,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"isLaohu8Offline":false,"tenantId":"TBGLOBAL","deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.45.2","shortVersion":"4.45.2","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2651495466","isCrawlerRequest":true}