Several Federal Reserve policymakers have lost confidence that inflation will return to the bank's 2% inflation on its own without intervention.
Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack, Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan, and Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari dissented from the Federal Open Market Committee's decision to hold interest rates steady on Wednesday in favor of a quarter-point increase, which would lift the fed-funds rate to target range of 3.75%-4.00%.
Hammack said Friday that she supported a rate hike because she was no longer confident that inflation will return to the Fed's objective on its own.
"In my view, now is the time for the FOMC to act to speed the return of PCE inflation to our 2% objective and deliver on our commitment to price stability for the American people," Hammack wrote in a statement released Friday. "The longer that high inflation persists, the more challenging and costly it can be to bring it back down."
Hammack added that she preferred to move at the FOMC's recent meeting because she did not see the current policy stance as appropriately restrictive. "Supply-side factors, including energy prices, have boosted inflation this year, but I see inflationary pressures coming from the demand side of the economy," Hammack wrote. She says businesses are telling her that pricing pressures are broadening rather than fading.
Minneapolis Fed's Kashkari said Friday that while he ascribes to the economic practice of "looking through" the inflationary effects of supply shocks, he's also concerned that the successive number of events the U.S. has experienced in recent years could lead to entrenched inflation.
"To manage against the risk that high inflation could become entrenched, I would rather tighten policy incrementally as we gather the data on the path of inflation and employment," Kashkari wrote in a statement released Friday.
Kashkari said that if inflation remains elevated, he believes the right policy move would be to implement a series of small rate hikes, as opposed to waiting and then concluding "even bolder actions were necessary."
Logan wrote Friday that inflation appears to be trending toward the mid-2% range, rather than all the way back to Fed's 2% target, even accounting for productivity gains and temporary supply shock.
"Without any policy restraint, inflation will likely continue to trend above target until there's an unanticipated shock," Logan wrote in a statement explaining her dissent vote. She noted that the FOMC cannot count on unexpected shocks to achieve its goals, adding policymakers can always adjust policy to respond to evolving conditions.
She echoed Kashkari in noting that by taking modest action in the near term, the Fed would reduce the likelihood of needing to take "sharper" actions later.
Hammack, Kashkari and Logan all previously dissented in April. While they supported the central bank's interest-rate decision to keep rates steady at that point, they did not support inclusion of an easing bias in the statement.
Comments