PPG Industries Inc. Stock Slips 6.0%, Underperforms Peers

Dow Jones07-30

This article was automatically generated by Dow Jones using technology from Automated Insights.

Shares of PPG Industries Inc. slipped 6.0% to $111.83 on what proved to be an all-around rough trading session for the stock market, with the S&P 500 Index falling 1.5% to 7,316.15 and Dow Jones Industrial Average falling 2.2% to 51,594.14.

The stock's fall snapped a three-day winning streak.

PPG Industries Inc. closed 16.2% short of its 52-week high of $133.43, which the company achieved on February 12th.

The stock demonstrated a mixed performance when compared to some of its peers, as 3M Co. fell 2.5% to $177.95, Sherwin-Williams Co. fell 2.9% to $343.88, and Masco Corp. fell 11.09% to $72.56.

Trading volume totaled 4.1 million, compared to the 50-day average of 2.0 million.

Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2655117058?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-07-30 04:35","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2655117058","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"PPG Industries Inc. Stock Slips 6.0%, Underperforms Peers","media":"Dow Jones","content":"<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\n  This article was automatically generated by Dow Jones using technology from Automated Insights. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Shares of PPG Industries Inc. slipped 6.0% to $111.83 on what proved to be an all-around rough trading session for the stock market, with the S&amp;P 500 Index falling 1.5% to 7,316.15 and Dow Jones Industrial Average falling 2.2% to 51,594.14. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The stock's fall snapped a three-day winning streak. \n</p>\n<p>\n     PPG Industries Inc. closed 16.2% short of its 52-week high of $133.43, which the company achieved on February 12th. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The stock demonstrated a mixed performance when compared to some of its peers, as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MMM\">3M</a> Co. fell 2.5% to $177.95, Sherwin-Williams Co. fell 2.9% to $343.88, and Masco Corp. fell 11.09% to $72.56. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Trading volume totaled 4.1 million, compared to the 50-day average of 2.0 million. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet \n</p>\n<pre style=\"white-space: pre\">\n \n</pre>\n</font>","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>PPG Industries Inc. Stock Slips 6.0%, Underperforms Peers</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPPG Industries Inc. Stock Slips 6.0%, Underperforms Peers\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-07-30 04:35</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\n  This article was automatically generated by Dow Jones using technology from Automated Insights. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Shares of PPG Industries Inc. slipped 6.0% to $111.83 on what proved to be an all-around rough trading session for the stock market, with the S&amp;P 500 Index falling 1.5% to 7,316.15 and Dow Jones Industrial Average falling 2.2% to 51,594.14. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The stock's fall snapped a three-day winning streak. \n</p>\n<p>\n     PPG Industries Inc. closed 16.2% short of its 52-week high of $133.43, which the company achieved on February 12th. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The stock demonstrated a mixed performance when compared to some of its peers, as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MMM\">3M</a> Co. fell 2.5% to $177.95, Sherwin-Williams Co. fell 2.9% to $343.88, and Masco Corp. fell 11.09% to $72.56. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Trading volume totaled 4.1 million, compared to the 50-day average of 2.0 million. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet \n</p>\n<pre style=\"white-space: pre\">\n \n</pre>\n</font>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"PPG","symbol_name":"PPG工业","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","article_id":"2655117058","we_media_id":"106","thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2655117058","pubTimestamp":1785357300,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":{"media_name":"Dow Jones","introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"summary":"This article was automatically generated by Dow Jones using technology from Automated Insights.Shares of PPG Industries Inc. slipped 6.0% to $111.83 on what proved to be an all-around rough trading session for the stock market, with the S&P 500 Index falling 1.5% to 7,316.15 and Dow Jones Industrial Average falling 2.2% to 51,594.14.The stock's fall snapped a three-day winning streak.PPG Industries Inc. closed 16.2% short of its 52-week high of $133.43, which the company achieved on February 12th.The stock demonstrated a mixed performance when compared to some of its peers, as 3M Co. fell 2.5% to $177.95, Sherwin-Williams Co. fell 2.9% to $343.88, and Masco Corp. fell 11.09% to $72.56.Trading volume totaled 4.1 million, compared to the 50-day average of 2.0 million.Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"","property":["rate"],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"PPG":"PPG工业"},"translate_title":"PPG Industries Inc. 股价下跌 6.0%，表现逊于同行","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"PPG":1.5},"content_text":"This article was automatically generated by Dow Jones using technology from Automated Insights. \n\n\n     Shares of PPG Industries Inc. slipped 6.0% to $111.83 on what proved to be an all-around rough trading session for the stock market, with the S&P 500 Index falling 1.5% to 7,316.15 and Dow Jones Industrial Average falling 2.2% to 51,594.14. \n\n\n     The stock's fall snapped a three-day winning streak. \n\n\n     PPG Industries Inc. closed 16.2% short of its 52-week high of $133.43, which the company achieved on February 12th. \n\n\n     The stock demonstrated a mixed performance when compared to some of its peers, as 3M Co. fell 2.5% to $177.95, Sherwin-Williams Co. fell 2.9% to $343.88, and Masco Corp. fell 11.09% to $72.56. \n\n\n     Trading volume totaled 4.1 million, compared to the 50-day average of 2.0 million. \n\n\n  Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":true,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"-1","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":true,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"isLaohu8Offline":false,"tenantId":"TBGLOBAL","deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.47.1","shortVersion":"4.47.1","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2655117058","isCrawlerRequest":true}