Eos Energy Enterprises (NASDAQ: EOSE) reported second-quarter 2026 revenue of $68.8 million, up 351% from $15.2 million a year earlier, while basic and diluted loss per share widened to $1.20 from $1.05. Higher cube deliveries and $55.0 million from a project later contributed to Frontier Power USA drove the top line, but gross loss increased to $48.8 million and adjusted EBITDA loss widened to $71.4 million. Gross and adjusted EBITDA margins nevertheless improved as production volume created better cost leverage.
Core earnings results
For the quarter ended June 30, 2026, cube deliveries increased 207%, supporting the sharp rise in revenue. Higher production volumes and lower conversion costs improved gross margin, although temporary underutilization across two manufacturing facilities and higher costs associated with the growing installed base prevented Eos from reaching positive gross profit.
GAAP net loss attributable to shareholders was $275.7 million, primarily because of mark-to-market fair-value adjustments on debt, warrants and derivatives. After a $130.6 million preferred-stock remeasurement, the net loss applicable to common stock was $406.3 million, which formed the basis for the per-share loss.
| Metric | Q2 2026 | Q2 2025 | Year-over-year change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $68.8 million | $15.2 million | +351% |
| Gross loss | ($48.8 million) | ($31.0 million) | Loss widened by $17.8 million |
| Gross margin | -71.0% | -203.2% | Improved by 132.2 percentage points |
| Operating loss | ($83.8 million) | ($63.8 million) | Loss widened by $20.0 million |
| Net loss attributable to shareholders | ($275.7 million) | ($222.9 million) | Loss widened by $52.8 million |
| Basic and diluted loss per share | ($1.20) | ($1.05) | Loss widened by $0.15 |
| Adjusted gross loss; margin | ($42.9 million); -62.3% | ($27.8 million); -182.6% | Margin improved by 120.3 points |
| Adjusted EBITDA loss; margin | ($71.4 million); -104% | ($51.6 million); -339% | Margin improved by 235 points |
Adjusted gross loss excludes stock-based compensation and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is also a non-GAAP measure and excludes several financing, fair-value and noncash items.
Business and manufacturing performance
Revenue was highly concentrated in one project. Eos generated $55.0 million, or approximately 80% of quarterly revenue, from a pre-existing project financed by a Cerberus affiliate. That project was contributed to Frontier Power USA when the joint venture closed on August 4. As of June 30, the project and FPUSA together represented 49% of Eos’ backlog volume.
Backlog reached $807 million, representing 3.4 GWh, and increased 25% sequentially and 20% year over year. Orders from four new customers and two repeat customers supported the increase. After quarter-end, Eos also received a $100 million FPUSA purchase order for the first phase of the Blanquilla project; that order was subsequent to the June 30 backlog measurement.
FPUSA raised approximately $263 million in gross proceeds, exceeding its initial $250 million equity target. The joint venture expects access to more than $1 billion of deployable project capital and has established a development pipeline of approximately 16 GWh.
Manufacturing capacity expanded when Eos began commercial production on Line 2 at Thorn Hill in mid-June. The line was operating one partial shift during its planned ramp, with battery cycle times approximately 10% faster and bipolar-line cycle times 11% faster than Line 1. The company said it remained on track to reach full production capacity in the fourth quarter.
Profitability, cash flow and liquidity
Total operating expenses increased to $35.0 million from $32.9 million. Research and development expense rose to $10.5 million from $7.2 million, while selling, general and administrative expense declined to $24.5 million from $25.5 million. The wider gross loss accounted for most of the increase in operating loss.
Eos ended June with $305.5 million of cash and cash equivalents, or $364.1 million including restricted cash. These balances should be viewed alongside the company’s cash consumption: during the first six months of 2026, operating activities used $191.8 million, compared with $95.0 million in the prior-year period, while investing activities used $70.6 million versus $12.0 million. Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash declined by $260.5 million during the six-month period.
Higher volume improved margins without producing gross profit
Eos’ results show a clear distinction between margin improvement and absolute profitability. Revenue increased more than fourfold, allowing fixed and conversion costs to be spread across greater production, but quarterly cost of goods sold remained above revenue at $117.6 million. Consequently, gross margin improved substantially while the dollar value of the gross loss still increased.
The same pattern appeared in adjusted EBITDA: its margin improved from negative 339% to negative 104%, but the adjusted EBITDA loss widened by nearly $20 million. Manufacturing consolidation and further Line 2 optimization therefore remain central to determining whether higher deliveries can eventually reduce, rather than merely dilute, operating losses.
2026 revenue guidance
Eos narrowed its full-year 2026 revenue guidance because it is evaluating the timing of consolidating production into the Thorn Hill facility. The lower end was maintained, but the upper end was reduced by $50 million, lowering the range midpoint by $25 million.
| Metric | Latest guidance | Previous guidance | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full-year 2026 revenue | $300 million-$350 million | $300 million-$400 million | Upper end reduced by $50 million |
Management expects the consolidation to improve manufacturing efficiency, capacity utilization and margins over time. Near-term execution will depend on coordinating the production transfer without materially disrupting deliveries.
Recent insider transactions
The supplied six-month insider summary shows 1,874,092 shares purchased across 27 transactions and 508,626 shares sold across 11 transactions, resulting in net purchases of 1,365,466 shares. Separately, the most recent records with complete transaction details were sales by Eos officers; entries without a disclosed transaction type or value have been omitted.
| Date | Insider | Position | Transaction | Reported value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 28, 2026 | Nathan Kroeker | Officer | Sale at $3.36 per share | $371,001 |
| July 28, 2026 | Sumeet Puri | Officer | Sale at $3.36 per share | $98,001 |
| July 27, 2026 | Joe Mastrangelo | Chief Executive Officer | Sale at $3.61 per share | $574,546 |
| July 7, 2026 | Nathan Kroeker | Chief Financial Officer | Sale at $4.68 per share | $371,166 |
| June 30, 2026 | Nathan Kroeker | Chief Financial Officer | Sale at $5.86 per share | $206,794 |
These records establish the timing and reported value of the transactions but do not disclose a reason for the sales.
Risks investors need to watch
- Negative unit economics: Cost of goods sold continued to exceed revenue, leaving gross margin at negative 71% despite its substantial improvement.
- Revenue and backlog concentration: One project produced approximately 80% of quarterly revenue, while that project and FPUSA represented 49% of backlog volume.
- Cash consumption: Operating and investing activities used a combined $262.3 million during the first six months of 2026.
- Manufacturing execution: The timing and effectiveness of consolidating operations at Thorn Hill could affect deliveries, utilization and progress toward better margins.
- Backlog conversion: The $807 million backlog provides potential future revenue, but conversion depends on project execution, customer financing and delivery timing.
Summary
Eos delivered rapid revenue growth and sharply better loss margins in Q2 2026, supported by higher deliveries and one large project. However, gross loss and adjusted EBITDA loss both increased in dollar terms, cash use remained substantial and revenue was concentrated. The main operating indicators ahead are Line 2 productivity, execution of the Thorn Hill consolidation, diversification of revenue beyond FPUSA-related projects and progress toward positive gross profit within the narrowed revenue range.
Find out more
Comments