Democrats intensify scrutiny of David Ellison amid Paramount–WBD legal battle

CNN Business08-12 22:57

As Paramount pushes to settle the state antitrust lawsuit that has stymied its deal to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, Democratic lawmakers continue to rally opposition to the deal. On ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2658050509?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-08-12 22:57","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2658050509","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Democrats intensify scrutiny of David Ellison amid Paramount–WBD legal battle","media":"CNN Business","content":"<div>\n<p>As Paramount pushes to settle the state antitrust lawsuit that has stymied its deal to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, Democratic lawmakers continue to rally opposition to the deal.\n    \n\n            On ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/12/media/paramount-wbd-david-ellison-jamie-raskin-democrats\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnn_highlight","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Democrats intensify scrutiny of David Ellison amid Paramount–WBD legal battle</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDemocrats intensify scrutiny of David Ellison amid Paramount–WBD legal battle\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-08-12 22:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/12/media/paramount-wbd-david-ellison-jamie-raskin-democrats><strong>CNN Business</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As Paramount pushes to settle the state antitrust lawsuit that has stymied its deal to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, Democratic lawmakers continue to rally opposition to the deal.\n    \n\n            On ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/12/media/paramount-wbd-david-ellison-jamie-raskin-democrats\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"BK4588","symbol_name":"碎股","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/12/media/paramount-wbd-david-ellison-jamie-raskin-democrats","article_id":"2658050509","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":{"source":"cnn_highlight","url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/12/media/paramount-wbd-david-ellison-jamie-raskin-democrats","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2658050509","pubTimestamp":1786546621,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"cnn_highlight","name":"CNN Business"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"As Paramount pushes to settle the state antitrust lawsuit that has stymied its deal to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, Democratic lawmakers continue to rally opposition to the deal.On Wednesday, Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, sent a new letter to Paramount CEO David Ellison accusing him of “colluding” with President Trump and urging him to answer questions.A Paramount spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.The letter highlights Democrats’ concerns about Paramount taking control of Warner-owned CNN. It comes the same week that Paramount chief legal officer Makan Delrahim said of CNN that Ellison “wants to bring it back to news,” a comment that raised eyebrows given that the network has been a global news brand for 46 years.Ellison’s op-ed made no mention of Trump, who has been a pivotal figure throughout the nearly year-long battle for contr","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"cnn.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"BK4588":"碎股","BK4223":"办公室房地产信托","BK4108":"电影和娱乐","BK4194":"办公房地产投资信托","LU0648001328.SGD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity RA SGD","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","WBD":"WARNER BROS DISCOVERY INC","PGRE":"Paramount Group","LU1201861249.SGD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity PA SGD-H","LU0130517989.USD":"HARRIS ASSOCIATES US VALUE EQUITY \"R\" INC","LU0130102774.USD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity RA USD","LU0980610538.SGD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity RA SGD-H","BK4598":"佩洛西持仓","LU0477156953.USD":"HARRIS ASSOCIATES US VALUE EQUITY \"RE\" (USD) ACC","BK4125":"广播","LU0149725797.USD":"汇丰美国股市经济规模基金"},"translate_title":"在派拉蒙与 WBD 的法律战中，民主党人加强了对大卫·埃里森的审查","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"PGRE":1.5,"WBD":1.5},"content_text":"As Paramount pushes to settle the state antitrust lawsuit that has stymied its deal to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, Democratic lawmakers continue to rally opposition to the deal.\n    \n\n            On Wednesday, Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, sent a new letter to Paramount CEO David Ellison accusing him of “colluding” with President Trump and urging him to answer questions.\n    \n\n            A Paramount spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.\n    \n\n            The letter highlights Democrats’ concerns about Paramount taking control of Warner-owned CNN. It comes the same week that Paramount chief legal officer Makan Delrahim said of CNN that Ellison “wants to bring it back to news,” a comment that raised eyebrows given that the network has been a global news brand for 46 years.\n    \n\n            The letter, which was obtained first by CNN, also suggests that Paramount’s dealings with the Trump administration — a relationship Raskin has called “corrupt” — will be a priority for the Judiciary Committee if Democrats regain the House majority in the midterm elections.\n    \n\n            Raskin opened the missive by acknowledging that Paramount has not responded to his four previous inquiries in the past 12 months.\n    \n\n            But “now that you have vowed to break your long silence,” he wrote, citing Ellison’s op-ed in The New York Times last week, “I invite you to a transcribed interview to tell Congress and America your story and answer the Committee’s questions about your Donald Trump-enabled shopping spree to consolidate news organizations, movie studios, cable channels, and streaming services.”\n    \n\n            With Republicans in control of the House, Democrats like Raskin can’t compel Ellison to testify, so the interview demand is a way to amplify his concerns about the deal.\n    \n\n            The new letter cites reports of “political interference” at Paramount-owned CBS News, which the news division has disputed.\n    \n\n            “CBS’s own reporters have shared how, under your leadership, the newsroom has catered to President Trump’s political whims and dictates under the watchful eye of a MAGA minder,” Raskin wrote, apparently referring to the accounts of fired “60 Minutes” correspondents.\n    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nCommittee Ranking Member U.S. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) speaks during a House Judiciary Subcommittee on Oversight hearing on July 22, 2026 in Washington, DC.\n\nSamuel Corum/Sipa/AP\n\n\n\n\n\n            Ellison wrote in the Times op-ed, “Great news organizations like CNN and CBS News are here to tell it straight down the middle. That requires newsrooms that reflect the whole world, not one side of it. And it requires independence. Our journalists will continue to answer to the facts and to all the people they serve — not to any party or cause.”\n    \n\n            Ellison’s op-ed made no mention of Trump, who has been a pivotal figure throughout the nearly year-long battle for control of Warner Bros. Discovery.\n    \n\n            Paramount sought a close relationship with Trump and his administration while seeking federal approval of the WBD merger.\n    \n\n            Ellison’s father Larry, the billionaire Oracle co-founder, has been a close ally of Trump’s for years. Trump has praised both father and son, calling them his “supporters” and expressing confidence in their plans for CBS. Trump has also been outspoken about his desire for CNN to come under new ownership, calling it “imperative.”\n    \n\n            Raskin’s letter cites an anonymously sourced report from the Wall Street Journal that “David Ellison offered assurances to Trump administration officials that if he bought Warner, he’d make sweeping changes to CNN.”\n    \n\n            Raskin wrote to Ellison, “You have eagerly shown the president that you are going to deliver on both counts as if you are controlling organs of state media.”\n    \n\n            The letter also indicated that a Democrat-led Judiciary Committee would probe the Justice Department’s mid-June approval of the Paramount merger, which many critics linked to Trump’s personal interest in the deal.\n    \n\n            Raskin said the committee would scrutinize whether federal agencies “are successfully promoting free competition and innovation—or whether they are using their governmental powers to distort the market and undermine freedom of speech and freedom of the press, in violation of the First Amendment.”\n    \n\n            Other Democratic lawmakers have also foreshadowed public hearings and probes about the matter and have supported the state attorneys general lawsuit seeking to stop Paramount’s expansion plan.\n    \n\n            Sen. Elizabeth Warren wrote in a social media post on Tuesday, “The Paramount–WBD merger isn’t about creating better entertainment. It’s about cutting costs & squeezing workers. Writers, actors, and crew will have fewer employers to work for, which means less bargaining power & lower wages. State AGs are stepping in to fight back.”\n    \n\n            Paramount has consistently said the deal is pro-competitive, pointing to the regulatory approvals from the Justice Department and other authorities around the world.\n    \n\n            But the deal is frozen in place due to the state antitrust lawsuit and a parallel lawsuit from the Writers Guild of America.\n    \n\n            Facing an uphill battle in court, Paramount agreed not to complete the merger until a trial is held or until June 1, 2027. A trial is slated to be held in March, though a settlement is possible before then.\n    \n\n            Speaking at a Politico conference on Tuesday, Delrahim said “we would be delighted to engage” in settlement talks “in order to repair the industry, create more jobs, bring more jobs and production back.”\n    \n\n            California Attorney General Rob Bonta said at the same conference that “we will be open to any proposals,” but “right now, we’re focused on litigation and going to trial.”\n    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThe Paramount Pictures logo is displayed on a water tower in Los Angeles, California, on August 6, 2026.\n\nMichael Yanow/NurPhoto/Getty Images\n\n\n\n\n\n            Both men also addressed a report by Puck’s Matt Belloni that Ellison told Paramount’s leadership team that he intends to move the company out of California if the antitrust case isn’t settled by October 1. Ellison has notably not made this threat in public, and Paramount has declined to comment on the report.\n    \n\n            Delrahim said Paramount doesn’t want to leave the state, but the company has to ”look at the business environment” and “ultimately, you know, go to a place where you’re wanted.”\n    \n\n            Bonta, speaking earlier in the day, said the leave-California threat “is an attempt to blackmail the regulators who are daring to enforce the law fairly and firmly.”\n    \n\n            Delrahim said it is not a blackmail attempt, and argued that “this merger is actually going to be good — not only for California — it’ll be good for America.”","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":false,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"isLaohu8Offline":false,"tenantId":"TBGLOBAL","deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.47.1","shortVersion":"4.47.1","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2658050509","isCrawlerRequest":true}