Crypto can serve as derivatives collateral. What happens when its price falls?

cryptonews09-25 18:53

The CFTC has updated its guidance on tokenized customer-fund investments and blockchain records, putting the focus back on the rules that already let some futures intermediaries take crypto as margin....

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2670793444?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-09-25 18:53","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2670793444","market":"fut","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Crypto can serve as derivatives collateral. What happens when its price falls?","media":"cryptonews","content":"<div>\n<p>The CFTC has updated its guidance on tokenized customer-fund investments and blockchain records, putting the focus back on the rules that already let some futures intermediaries take crypto as margin....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://crypto.news/crypto-can-serve-as-derivatives-collateral-what-happens-when-its-price-falls/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"crypto_news_highlight","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Crypto can serve as derivatives collateral. What happens when its price falls?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCrypto can serve as derivatives collateral. What happens when its price falls?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-09-25 18:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://crypto.news/crypto-can-serve-as-derivatives-collateral-what-happens-when-its-price-falls/><strong>cryptonews</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The CFTC has updated its guidance on tokenized customer-fund investments and blockchain records, putting the focus back on the rules that already let some futures intermediaries take crypto as margin....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://crypto.news/crypto-can-serve-as-derivatives-collateral-what-happens-when-its-price-falls/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"HECO","symbol_name":"SPDR Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://crypto.news/crypto-can-serve-as-derivatives-collateral-what-happens-when-its-price-falls/","article_id":"2670793444","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":{"source":"crypto_news_highlight","url":"https://crypto.news/crypto-can-serve-as-derivatives-collateral-what-happens-when-its-price-falls/","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2670793444","pubTimestamp":1790333611,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"crypto_news_highlight","name":"Crypto News"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"The CFTC has updated its guidance on tokenized customer-fund investments and blockchain records, putting the focus back on the rules that already let some futures intermediaries take crypto as margin. A fall in the token’s price sets off several different calculations. The crucial distinctions are whose asset it is, which haircut applies, and who must fill a shortfall.The CFTC updated its crypto activity FAQs on September 24, 2026, addressing 2 subjects: tokenized investments and blockchain records.February’s Staff Letter 26-05 lets qualifying intermediaries count certain customer crypto as margin under specified conditions.The staff letter requires at least a 20% haircut for most non-stablecoin crypto in specified intermediary calculations.A $100,000 token position subject to a 20% haircut starts with $80,000 of recognized value.The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has updated its crypto activity FAQs as regulated derivatives firms work with tokenized assets and digital records.CF","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"crypto.news","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"HECO":"SPDR Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF","BITW":"Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF","BTCL":"T-REX 2X LONG BITCOIN DAILY TARGET ETF","CBTJ":"Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January","DAPP":"VanEck Digital Transformation ETF","BTGD":"STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF","NGHT":"Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF","BITX":"2倍比特币期货ETF-Volatility Shares","CRPT":"First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry and Digital Economy ETF","TXXH":"21Shares 2x Long HYPE ETF","BTCO":"比特币ETF-Invesco Galaxy","YBIT":"YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income ETF","BTRN":"比特币期货ETF-Global X","QQQP":"Tradr 2X Long Innovation 100 Quarterly ETF","BITB":"比特币ETF-Bitwise","MSBT":"Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust ETP","BTFX":"比特币期货ETF-CoinShares","FBTC":"比特币ETF-Fidelity","BITC":"Bitwise Trendwise Bitcoin and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF","BETE":"等权重比特币&以太币期货ETF-ProShares","GBTC":"比特币ETF-Grayscale","YBTC":"比特币看涨期权ETF-Roundhill","BTCZ":"T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF","IBIT":"比特币ETF-iShares","SBIT":"2倍做空比特币期货ETF-Proshares","BITI":"1倍做空比特币期货ETF-Proshares","ARKB":"比特币ETF-21Shares","BETH":"比特币&以太币期货ETF-ProShares","LFGY":"YieldMax Crypto Industry and Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF","BITO":"比特币期货ETF-ProShares","BTC":"Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust","GDLC":"Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF","ARKY":"ARK Active Autocallable Income ETF","WGMI":"比特币矿商ETF-CoinShares","BEGS":"RAREVIEW 2X BULL CRYPTOCURRENCY & PRECIOUS METALS ETF","BITQ":"Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF","BPI":"Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF","BRRR":"比特币ETF-CoinShares","STCE":"Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF","BTCI":"NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF","HODL":"比特币ETF-VanEck","MNRS":"GRAYSCALE BITCOIN MINERS ETF","BTF":"比特币&以太币期货ETF-CoinShares","MAXI":"比特币期货ETF-Simplify","BITU":"2倍做多比特币期货ETF-Proshares","BKCH":"AdvisorShares Sabretooth ETF","NCIQ":"HASHDEX NASDAQ CRYPTO INDEX US ETF"},"translate_title":"加密货币可以作为衍生品抵押品。当它的价格下跌时会发生什么？","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"HECO":0.9,"BTCI":0.9,"MSBT":0.9,"NCIQ":0.9,"YBTC":0.9,"MAXI":0.9,"BITO":0.6,"MNRS":0.9,"MBTmain":0.9,"BITI":0.9,"BITQ":0.9,"BKCH":0.9,"BPI":0.6,"BTGD":0.9,"BRRR":0.9,"ARKB":0.9,"FBTC":0.9,"BITU":0.9,"QQQP":1.5,"BTCZ":0.9,"NGHT":0.9,"BTFX":0.9,"BITC":0.9,"BITW":0.9,"BETH":0.9,"BITX":0.9,"CRPT":0.9,"BTRN":0.9,"BTCL":0.9,"BETE":0.9,"BTCO":0.9,"CBTJ":0.9,"BTF":0.9,"IBIT":0.6,"YBIT":0.9,"HODL":0.9,"TXXH":0.9,"BITB":0.9,"LFGY":0.9,"GBTC":0.9,"GDLC":0.9,"DAPP":0.9,"ARKY":0.9,"BTC":0.6,"SBIT":0.9,"WGMI":0.9,"BEGS":0.9,"STCE":0.9},"content_text":"The CFTC has updated its guidance on tokenized customer-fund investments and blockchain records, putting the focus back on the rules that already let some futures intermediaries take crypto as margin. A fall in the token’s price sets off several different calculations. The crucial distinctions are whose asset it is, which haircut applies, and who must fill a shortfall.\n\n\nSummary\n\n\n\nThe CFTC updated its crypto activity FAQs on September 24, 2026, addressing 2 subjects: tokenized investments and blockchain records.\nFebruary’s Staff Letter 26-05 lets qualifying intermediaries count certain customer crypto as margin under specified conditions.\nThe staff letter requires at least a 20% haircut for most non-stablecoin crypto in specified intermediary calculations.\nA $100,000 token position subject to a 20% haircut starts with $80,000 of recognized value.\nThe earlier FAQ gives clearinghouses discretion to set initial-margin haircuts and review them at least monthly.\n\n\n\nThe Commodity Futures Trading Commission has updated its crypto activity FAQs as regulated derivatives firms work with tokenized assets and digital records.\nThe agency’s September 24 release says the latest additions address investments of customer funds in tokenized forms of permitted investments and blockchain recordkeeping. It points back to the March 20 FAQs, Staff Letter 25-39 on tokenized collateral and Staff Letter 26-05 on digital assets accepted as customer margin. The announcement does not say that September 24 created an unrestricted new right to pledge any token against any derivatives trade. The collateral permission, and its conditions, predate the new release.\nThe CFTC’s existing crypto guidance was covered by crypto.news in March. Its practical question has become more urgent as firms put digital assets into structures usually associated with cash and government securities. Suppose a customer posts bitcoin against a futures position and bitcoin falls while the futures position loses money. A mark on the coin and a mark on the trade occur together. The first reduces the value of security available to the account; the second raises what the account needs.\nThe regulatory papers separate these movements. Staff Letter 26-05 concerns what a futures commission merchant, or FCM, may count while evaluating a customer account and segregated funds. A derivatives clearing organization, or DCO, sets its own haircut for assets accepted as initial margin under separate rules. A 20% charge on an intermediary’s proprietary bitcoin inventory is a third issue. Applying one number to all three would give the reader a false answer.\nSeptember’s FAQ update is narrower than the collateral headlines\nCFTC Release 9303-26 names the Market Participants Division, Division of Market Oversight and Division of Clearing and Risk as the staff groups publishing the update. The release specifies two matters: tokenized versions of investments already permitted for customer funds and use of blockchain technology to satisfy recordkeeping requirements. It traces the FAQ series to March 20, 2026. That chronology is the first check on claims circulating about a new collateral rule.\nThe original March FAQs explicitly say an FCM may not invest customer funds in payment stablecoins under Regulation 1.25 merely because it can accept a qualifying stablecoin as customer margin. An FCM may, under Staff Letter 26-05, place its own payment stablecoins into segregated customer accounts as residual interest. These are different sources of funds and different transactions. Buying tokens with segregated customer cash is not interchangeable with receiving a customer’s token as a margin deposit.\nThe distinction carries into the September update. A tokenized form of an investment already permitted under Regulation 1.25 is a question about the wrapper on an eligible underlying asset. It is not a general license for an intermediary to use customer cash to buy bitcoin or a payment stablecoin. Without the full text of the updated FAQ attached to the CFTC’s public release as reviewed for this feature, the release supports only its stated scope. We do not attribute new haircut values or new eligibility categories to yesterday’s update.\n\nJUST IN: CFTC sends a new crypto market rulemaking to the White House for review.The proposal, titled “Regulation Crypto Asset Transactions and Regulation Crypto Asset Markets,” was submitted to OIRA on September 17, just two days after the Senate’s CLARITY Act vote failed… pic.twitter.com/kfpEc4wwGu— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) September 18, 2026\n\nAn agency staff FAQ is not an amendment to every CFTC rule. Staff Letter 26-05 is a no-action position: the Market Participants Division says it will not recommend enforcement against an FCM acting within specified conditions. It does not repeal the customer segregation provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act, and it does not promise that a DCO will accept every coin. The original letter was issued following a request by Coinbase Financial Markets and was reissued on February 6, 2026, to clarify that a national trust bank may qualify as a payment stablecoin issuer for its purposes.\nThe CFTC’s latest tokenization comments show the policy context. Chairman Michael Selig has discussed round-the-clock markets and tokenized collateral; an agency’s interest in those markets does not eliminate the ordinary margin test. A clearinghouse still has to decide whether a proposed collateral asset has sufficiently low credit, market and liquidity risk for its clearing program.\nThe customer owns the token, but its recognized value can move\nA futures customer places margin with an FCM, which carries the customer’s trading account. Federal segregation rules require the intermediary to account for customer property separately from the firm’s own assets. Staff Letter 26-05 lets an FCM count certain non-security digital assets, including payment stablecoins, when determining whether the customer account is undermargined and performing specified segregation calculations, provided it follows the letter’s conditions.\nThe FCM does not simply copy the wallet’s displayed market value into those calculations. For a payment stablecoin it determines fair market value and applies a haircut under its risk policies. For other qualifying digital assets the letter calls for a haircut of at least 20% for the specified calculations, subject to the letter’s particular exception for collateral and a position both based on and denominated in the same asset. The FCM’s relevant valuation or a clearing organization or trading venue’s measure may differ depending on the calculation. The text matters more than a slogan that bitcoin is accepted at 80 cents on the dollar everywhere.\nHere is a deliberately simple illustration, not a report of an actual account. A customer posts bitcoin worth $100,000, and the relevant FCM calculation applies a 20% haircut. Recognized value is $80,000. If bitcoin’s spot value then falls by 15% to $85,000 and the haircut remains 20%, recognized value becomes $68,000. The haircut alone did not jump; market value fell. The account has lost $12,000 of recognized collateral value without a single bitcoin leaving custody.\nNow assume the relevant margin requirement for the futures position stays at $75,000. Before the bitcoin move, $80,000 of recognized collateral exceeds the requirement by $5,000. After the move, $68,000 leaves a $7,000 shortfall. The gap changed by $12,000. If the position itself simultaneously loses $10,000, the economic pressure becomes more severe, but the precise cash call depends on the account’s other balances, settlement, portfolio margin and the FCM’s rules. The illustration deliberately holds those factors fixed to show one moving part at a time.\nIt follows that a 20% haircut is not an insurance policy against a 20% fall. Starting with $100,000, a 20% haircut gives $80,000 of credit. If spot subsequently drops 25%, the asset is worth $75,000 and its value after the same haircut is $60,000, a $20,000 decline in recognized credit. The ratio applies to the new price each time. Calling the initial discount a guarantee would obscure the mechanics of margin calls.\nThe hypothetical can be run in the other direction to see what would invalidate the concern. If the token price is flat, the recognized collateral value stays at $80,000 under the fixed 20% assumption; a fall in the trader’s futures position could still create a margin deficit. If the futures position earns enough to offset a decline in the pledged token, the combined account may remain above its required margin even as the bitcoin collateral loses value. The public letter does not allow an outsider to infer a margin call from a token price alone. Account equity, product exposure and the firm’s house margin are needed.\nNor is the haircut necessarily static. The 20% in the letter is a minimum for the specified non-stablecoin FCM calculations, not a cap. If the FCM’s risk policy required 30%, a $100,000 holding would initially count as $70,000. After a 15% decline in the asset price, it would count as $59,500. Changing the assumed discount from 20% to 30% while holding the post-decline price at $85,000 would reduce recognized value by another $8,500. A fall in spot and an increase in the discount can therefore compound; whether a firm changes its policy in a real episode requires its actual rules or an announcement, neither of which follows from the CFTC letter alone.\nThe same caution applies to a payment stablecoin that moves below its intended peg. The letter instructs a firm to use fair market value and its risk policy, with an appropriate haircut, when counting a payment stablecoin. A token trading at 98 cents does not retain one dollar of regulatory collateral value merely because its issuer promises redemption at par. The recognized amount would depend on the policy’s treatment of market price, redemption access and the relevant haircut. It would be wrong to use the 2% proprietary capital charge as an automatic discount on a customer’s stablecoin margin: the figure addresses the firm’s own position in a different calculation.\nThe letter has a narrower exception when a customer posts a non-stablecoin digital asset to support a contract both based on and denominated in that same asset. For the permitted offset against the deficit in that specific contract, the applicable clearing organization or foreign clearing organization’s haircut alone may govern. The exception does not turn that asset into universal collateral for every unrelated contract. For an account holding more than one kind of derivatives exposure, the FCM must still apply the relevant requirements to the exposures outside the exception.\nThe clearinghouse sets a separate haircut\nThe March CFTC FAQs answer the DCO question directly. A clearinghouse may accept crypto assets, including qualifying payment stablecoins, as initial margin if the assets meet Regulation 39.13(g)(10), which limits accepted assets to those with minimal credit, market and liquidity risks. Regulation 39.13(g)(12) makes the DCO responsible for setting haircuts that account for those risks, including stressed market conditions, and for reassessing them at least monthly.\nNo universal CFTC clearinghouse bitcoin haircut appears in that answer. A venue might apply a larger discount, restrict a coin, impose concentration limits or decline it under its risk rules. The FCM’s treatment of a customer’s margin and the DCO’s treatment of collateral posted to the clearinghouse operate at different links in the chain. An individual can see a token in an FCM account without the clearinghouse necessarily holding that same token as its own initial margin. The FCM may satisfy clearing obligations in another accepted form.\nThe easiest error is to import the 20% proprietary capital charge from Question 6 of the March FAQ into Question 8 about a DCO’s initial-margin haircut. Question 6 says the CFTC staff would not object if an FCM used a minimum 20% capital charge for its own inventory positions in bitcoin or ether, and 2% for its own payment stablecoins. Those are regulatory net-capital deductions on the firm’s property. Question 8 requires the DCO to choose its own haircut for initial margin. Question 1 separately tells the FCM how to treat customer property using the conditions in Staff Letter 26-05.\n\nJUST IN: Kraken parent Payward plans to bring onchain perpetual futures to U.S. clientsSubject to regulatory approval, Payward’s CFTC-regulated Bitnomial exchange and clearinghouse would operate permissioned HIP-3 markets on Hyperliquid, while NinjaTrader would handle client… pic.twitter.com/mETl3JbKU4— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) September 16, 2026\n\nThree percentages might happen to coincide in one arrangement. They still come from different rules and belong to different balance sheets. The comparison is especially relevant when an FCM tries to meet a shortfall with its own stablecoins. Staff guidance permits proprietary qualifying payment stablecoins as residual interest in a segregated customer account but does not permit the firm to substitute proprietary bitcoin or ether for that purpose. The 2% capital charge on proprietary stablecoin holdings is a separate firm-level cost.\nThe market for tokenized funds supplies a related example. A fund share represented on a blockchain can carry the legal and economic rights of a conventional eligible fund share, yet the speed of moving a token is only one part of its margin value. Fund redemption terms, ownership records, settlement restrictions and who can receive the shares remain relevant. The CFTC’s tokenized-collateral guidance focuses on equivalence of rights, not merely on whether a blockchain transaction confirms quickly.\nFranklin Templeton’s tokenized BENJI fund shares illustrate how a fund token can sit inside securities and custody structures even while its ownership record uses a blockchain. Whether any such share is accepted in a particular derivatives margin program depends on that program’s rules. The existence of a token and a large pool of underlying government assets does not show that a DCO has approved it as collateral.\nA falling price reaches three balance sheets\nWhen a customer’s bitcoin collateral declines, the customer faces the first exposure: it must keep its account adequately margined under the firm’s and venue’s rules. A deficit can lead to a call for more collateral, reduced positions or liquidation under the applicable agreements. An FCM that serves as intermediary must monitor its own exposure and keep customer segregation intact. The clearinghouse monitors its members and the assets it accepts as initial margin. They are linked, but their duties are not identical.\nThe Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations prohibit an FCM from using one customer’s property to carry another customer’s positions. Staff Letter 26-05 describes why FCMs may have to place their own funds into segregation equal to customer undermargined amounts, including deficits. That obligation is the reason a rapid collateral move is not merely an app notification for one trader. An intermediary must account for it in a protected customer-funds system whose balance changes with the value of pledged assets.\nTime complicates the chain. The March FAQs say the FCM’s daily segregation reports compute separate schedules as of the close of each business day. Crypto prices can move continuously. A firm may monitor and call margin more often under its own risk policies, but the existence of daily regulatory reporting should not be mistaken for a token price that changes only once daily. Nor does a blockchain timestamp itself establish the legal value accepted by a clearing organization when the relevant market becomes thin.\nAn FCM’s own contribution to a segregated account deserves a separate explanation. Customer property is protected by segregation, but if a customer account is undermargined, the firm may have to put its own money into the segregated pool so the protected total is not short. The margin call issued to a customer and the firm-level deposit into segregation can occur on different schedules. A customer may later cure a deficit or close a position; the firm’s immediate duty to preserve required segregation does not wait for an optimistic prediction about that customer’s next transfer. Staff Letter 26-05 addresses how the FCM counts the qualifying crypto when it determines that amount. It does not authorize using another customer’s surplus as a substitute for the firm’s money.\nIn practice, the customer agreement can set a house margin above a clearinghouse minimum. A trader looking only at the DCO’s public haircut or product margin schedule may therefore understate the collateral demanded by its FCM. Conversely, a clearinghouse’s decision to recognize a token does not force every intermediary to offer that token to customers. Those choices can be checked against a particular firm’s disclosures, but the CFTC’s general FAQ does not supply a single industrywide customer contract.\nThe staff letter first limited an FCM relying on the no-action position to payment stablecoins, bitcoin and ether as customer margin for its initial three months. It required notices of significant operational or cyber problems during that period and weekly reporting of amounts held by asset and account class. After the initial period, an FCM may accept other qualifying crypto assets if it meets the letter’s continuing conditions; it must submit revised risk policies before accepting some assets. Reporting and the initial restriction have different start and end mechanics. It would be inaccurate to claim all FCMs became eligible to accept every token on the same calendar date.\nA second 2026 staff action addressed customer crypto sent to foreign brokers for certain foreign futures arrangements. The location and reuse rights of pledged property can change in such a structure. It should not be folded into the domestic clearinghouse example without checking the relevant letter and customer agreement. Asset custody, margin recognition and legal claims need to be traced for the particular route a trader uses.\nA strong case for crypto collateral still needs limits\nThe strongest affirmative argument comes from the CFTC’s own pilot and subsequent staff work. In December 2025, acting chair Caroline Pham launched a digital-asset pilot that included bitcoin, ether and tokenized collateral in derivatives markets with reporting and monitoring requirements. A trader who already holds these assets may avoid selling them simply to create cash margin. Tokenized fund shares may preserve claims on an eligible investment while making transfers faster within approved systems. The staff letters set conditions because officials saw a use case they were prepared to test.\n\nJUST IN: Binance expands bStocks margin collateral eligibilityTokenized stock holders can now use eligible bStocks as collateral across all Cross Margin and Portfolio Margin accounts, giving traders more flexibility in how they deploy capital. pic.twitter.com/q3jxLQj26p— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) September 23, 2026\n\nNeither faster movement nor a public ledger cancels market risk. Regulation 39.13(g)(10) still asks a DCO to assess credit, market and liquidity risks. CFTC Staff Letter 26-05 still requires valuation policies and deductions for an FCM relying on relief. A clearinghouse can consider stressed markets when setting a haircut. A token whose transfer settles promptly can still have a falling market price or a legal ownership claim that takes time to verify. The regulatory system treats those as separate questions.\nThere is a measurable distinction between holding a token as customer collateral, holding an FCM’s token as firm inventory, and using a tokenized security as an investment of customer cash. The September 24 FAQs concern the third of these subjects and blockchain records. The March FAQs and February letter speak to the first two. A story that merges them would incorrectly imply a new permission or an official 20% haircut across every venue.\nLimits remain. The CFTC releases reviewed here do not show how many FCMs filed a notice, how much bitcoin they currently hold as collateral, or a definitive haircut for a named clearinghouse’s latest program. The $100,000 example shows the math of a fixed haircut and a market move; it is not a forecast of liquidations. An actual customer’s result requires its account records, product margin schedule, collateral mix and agreements.\nWhat to watch\n\nUpdated CFTC FAQs: Check the published text for the exact treatment of tokenized permitted investments and blockchain records.\nFCM collateral terms: Look for each firm’s accepted coins, customer valuation policy and house haircuts.\nDCO margin schedules: Check the clearinghouse’s eligible assets and its own haircut for each accepted token.\nFCM notices and disclosures: Identify firms publicly reporting reliance on Staff Letter 26-05 without assuming all intermediaries participate.\nToken price and required margin: Compare both at the same timestamp to see whether a customer’s recognized collateral still covers its obligation.\n\nThe March FAQ specifies that a DCO must reassess whether its collateral haircuts remain appropriate at least monthly. Its staff answer leaves the actual discount to the clearinghouse under Regulation 39.13(g)(12).\nFAQ\n\n\n\nDid the CFTC first allow bitcoin as derivatives collateral on September 24?\n\nNo. September’s release updates FAQs on tokenized customer-fund investments and blockchain records. The earlier Staff Letter 26-05 describes the no-action conditions for FCMs accepting certain customer crypto as margin.\n\n\n\nIs the bitcoin collateral haircut always 20%?\n\nNo. The letter calls for at least a 20% haircut in certain FCM calculations for non-stablecoin assets, subject to a specified same-asset exception. A DCO sets its own initial-margin haircut based on risk.\n\n\n\nWhat happens to $100,000 in bitcoin margin after a 15% price drop?\n\nWith a fixed illustrative 20% haircut, its recognized value moves from $80,000 to $68,000. The actual margin call depends on the account and product rules.\n\n\n\nIs the 20% FCM capital charge the same as a clearinghouse haircut?\n\nNo. The March FAQ’s 20% proprietary charge concerns an FCM’s own bitcoin or ether inventory. A DCO sets a separate haircut on initial margin that it accepts.\n\n\n\nCan a futures firm use customer cash to buy stablecoins?\n\nThe March FAQs say the no-action letter does not expand Regulation 1.25’s list of permitted investments. The staff distinguishes investing customer funds from accepting customer stablecoins as margin.\n\n\n\nCan an FCM place its own bitcoin into customer segregation?\n\nThe FAQ says the letter permits proprietary payment stablecoins as residual interest under its conditions, not proprietary bitcoin or ether. Customer-owned qualifying bitcoin can be treated separately as margin.\n\n\n\nWho fills a shortfall when crypto collateral falls?\n\nThe customer must maintain its required account margin under the applicable terms. The FCM must meet its own segregation and clearing obligations and cannot use another customer’s property to carry that deficit.\n\n\n\nDoes faster blockchain settlement remove collateral risk?\n\nNo. CFTC requirements still address asset valuation, stressed liquidity and ownership rights. This is educational analysis, not investment advice.\n\n\n\n\nDisclaimer: This article is for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Figures reflect regulatory filings and reporting available at the time of writing and change with each disclosure. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security or asset. Always do your own research. Information is accurate as of September 25, 2026.\n\n\n\n\n\n                Read more:\n            \n\n                Bitcoin holders are taking profits, is a selloff coming?","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":false,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"isLaohu8Offline":false,"tenantId":"TBGLOBAL","deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.50.1","shortVersion":"4.50.1","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2670793444","isCrawlerRequest":true}