Hyperliquid trader’s $170M oil orders raise spoofing concerns

cryptonews03:27

Solidus Labs has flagged more than $170 million in suspicious oil-linked perpetual orders on Hyperliquid during March’s energy-market volatility. Summary Solidus reportedly identified two ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2679041549?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-10-29 03:27","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2679041549","market":"fut","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Hyperliquid trader’s $170M oil orders raise spoofing concerns","media":"cryptonews","content":"<div>\n<p>Solidus Labs has flagged more than $170 million in suspicious oil-linked perpetual orders on Hyperliquid during March’s energy-market volatility.\n\n\nSummary\n\n\n\nSolidus reportedly identified two ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://crypto.news/hyperliquid-oil-orders-solidus-spoofing/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"crypto_news_highlight","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hyperliquid trader’s $170M oil orders raise spoofing concerns</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHyperliquid trader’s $170M oil orders raise spoofing concerns\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-10-29 03:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://crypto.news/hyperliquid-oil-orders-solidus-spoofing/><strong>cryptonews</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Solidus Labs has flagged more than $170 million in suspicious oil-linked perpetual orders on Hyperliquid during March’s energy-market volatility.\n\n\nSummary\n\n\n\nSolidus reportedly identified two ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://crypto.news/hyperliquid-oil-orders-solidus-spoofing/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"USE","symbol_name":"USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://crypto.news/hyperliquid-oil-orders-solidus-spoofing/","article_id":"2679041549","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":{"source":"crypto_news_highlight","url":"https://crypto.news/hyperliquid-oil-orders-solidus-spoofing/","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2679041549","pubTimestamp":1793215676,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"crypto_news_highlight","name":"Crypto News"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Solidus Labs has flagged more than $170 million in suspicious oil-linked perpetual orders on Hyperliquid during March’s energy-market volatility.Solidus reportedly identified two accounts placing suspicious orders during three days of volatile oil trading.Brent crude contracts accounted for most of the activity, with WTI and natural gas involved.Hyperliquid Labs pointed to public blockchain records in its response to the reported findings.Lookonchain said the activity involved two accounts between March 8 and 10, with large orders repeatedly canceled while trades were completed on the opposite side of the order book.In Lookonchain’s account, Solidus estimated the trader’s three-day profit at roughly $119,000, with canceled order value around 30 times the value of opposite-side executions.One March 9 example involved approximately $17 million in canceled sell orders alongside $425,000 in completed purchases, the summary said. Solidus described spoofing characteristics, although intent r","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"crypto.news","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"USE":"USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund","DBC":"商品指数ETF-PowerShares DB","DUG":"二倍做空石油与天然气ETF(ProShares)","VDE":"Vanguard Energy ETF","USL":"United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP","DIG":"二倍做多美国油气指数","WTIU":"MICROSECTORS ENERGY 3X LEVERAGED ETN","XES":"SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF","DBE":"能源商品ETF-PowerShares","USO":"美国原油ETF","GUSH":"Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X ETF","PXE":"Invesco Energy Exploration & Production ETF","USOI":"ETRACS Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN","XOP":"油气开采指数ETF-SPDR S&P","BHYP":"Bitwise Hyperliquid ETF","OIH":"石油服务ETF","UGA":"United States Gasoline Fund LP","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","IXC":"全球能源业ETF-iShares","DRIP":"Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bear 2X ETF","ERX":"二倍做多能源ETF-Direxion","BK4570":"地缘局势概念股","BNO":"美国布伦特原油基金有限合伙企业","UCO":"二倍做多彭博原油ETF","BWET":"BREAKWAVE TANKER SHIPPING ETF","FBZ":"First Trust Brazil AlphaDEX Fund","IEO":"iShares Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas","XLE":"SPDR能源指数ETF","PXJ":"Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF","OILK":"ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF","SCO":"二倍做空彭博原油指数ETF","DRLL":"Strive U.S. Energy ETF","OILT":"Texas Oil Index ETF","FTXN":"First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF","OILU":"MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. 3x Leveraged ETN","DBO":"原油ETF-PowerShares","BK4588":"碎股"},"translate_title":"Hyperliquid trader 的 1.7 亿美元石油订单引发欺诈担忧","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"USL":1.5,"OILT":1.5,"IEO":1.5,"USOI":1.5,"BHYP":1.5,"USE":1.5,"DBO":1.5,"OILU":1.5,"XLE":1.5,"DRIP":1.5,"UGA":1.5,"XES":1.5,"DIG":1.5,"OIH":1.5,"DBC":1.5,"OILK":1.5,"WTIU":1.5,"FBZ":1.5,"FTXN":1.5,"ERX":1.5,"PXJ":1.5,"XOP":1.5,"DUG":1.5,"SCO":0.6,"BNO":1.5,"PXE":1.5,"UCO":0.6,"DBE":1.5,"IXC":1.5,"GUSH":1.5,"DRLL":1.5,"VDE":1.5,"USO":1.5,"BWET":1.5},"content_text":"Solidus Labs has flagged more than $170 million in suspicious oil-linked perpetual orders on Hyperliquid during March’s energy-market volatility.\n\n\nSummary\n\n\n\nSolidus reportedly identified two accounts placing suspicious orders during three days of volatile oil trading.\nBrent crude contracts accounted for most of the activity, with WTI and natural gas involved.\nHyperliquid Labs pointed to public blockchain records in its response to the reported findings.\n\n\n\nLookonchain said the activity involved two accounts between March 8 and 10, with large orders repeatedly canceled while trades were completed on the opposite side of the order book.\nHyperliquid oil orders involved repeated cancellations\nIn Lookonchain’s account, Solidus estimated the trader’s three-day profit at roughly $119,000, with canceled order value around 30 times the value of opposite-side executions.\nOne March 9 example involved approximately $17 million in canceled sell orders alongside $425,000 in completed purchases, the summary said. Solidus described spoofing characteristics, although intent remained unconfirmed.\nHyperliquid Labs responded that orders, cancellations and transactions are publicly recorded onchain for review by market participants and regulators, according to the summary.\nHIP-3 documentation assigns market operations to deployers\nHyperliquid’s documentation assigns the definition and operation of HIP-3 markets to independent deployers. Their duties include choosing contract specifications, defining the oracle, setting reference prices and leverage limits, and settling a market when needed.\nEach deployment has its own margining, order books, and operator settings, according to the protocol specification. The documented settlement function allows a deployer to halt an asset’s trading, cancel outstanding orders, and settle positions at the current mark price.\nThe specification describes a separate validator process for penalizing deployers through reductions to their staked HYPE. Its stated focus is conduct that threatens the protocol’s correctness, availability or performance, including irregular inputs that exploit system limits.\nThe documentation says technical slashing does not distinguish malicious behavior from incompetence or compromised operator keys.\nIn September, crypto.news reported that Hyperliquid was testing optional permissioned markets, allowing deployers to manage lists of approved participants. The preliminary design let operators appoint sub-deployers to handle access decisions, while existing markets could continue without adopting permissioning.\nUS spoofing guidance requires intent to cancel\nThe CFTC’s May 2013 guidance defines the statutory spoofing offense around bidding or offering with the intention of canceling before execution. The commission says the standard requires intent beyond recklessness and excludes legitimate, good-faith order cancellations.\nWhen assessing possible violations, the agency says it considers market conditions, trading patterns, fill characteristics, and other relevant circumstances.\nA partially executed order does not automatically exempt the remaining activity from scrutiny, according to the guidance, which describes the provision’s application to products traded on registered entities, including designated contract markets and swap execution facilities.\nCME Group’s explanation of its own rule describes large orders used to create an artificial appearance of buying or selling pressure while a trader obtains executions on the opposite side. The exchange says making a two-sided market with unequal quantities is permitted when the orders are entered for genuine transactions.\nFor energy perpetuals, the CFTC opened a separate consultation in June covering contracts linked to physically delivered or storable commodities. In its announcement, the commission sought comments on both continuous trading in conventional futures and the potential listing of perpetual energy contracts.\nCFTC Chair Michael Selig called for a “clear, data-driven record” in the agency’s June announcement.\nHyperliquid Policy Center and trade[XYZ] subsequently requested regulated energy perpetuals on Aug. 26, naming WTI crude, Brent crude and Henry Hub natural gas. Their submission called for a technology-neutral framework and safeguards covering leverage, funding and liquidation disclosures, according to the groups’ published account of the filing.\nIn that account, the organizations asked regulators to recognize stablecoins and tokenized traditional collateral as eligible margin for cleared derivatives. They proposed clarifying how requirements tied to business days would apply to continuously operating venues and allowing onchain execution, margining, clearing, settlement and recordkeeping where regulatory core principles are satisfied.\nThe policy center cited its own research comparing weekend crude perpetual prices with the subsequent reopening of the benchmark futures market. In nearly 75% of the closures sampled, it said, the perpetual finished closer to the Sunday reopening price than the benchmark’s Friday close.\nIts study reported no statistically significant deterioration in CME WTI reopening quality after the crude perpetual launched.\nThe groups’ published account said dated futures would continue serving participants needing physical settlement or exposure to particular delivery months. Their proposed perpetual contracts would have no expiration, using recurring funding payments to bring their prices toward the referenced market.\nPayward’s US market proposal separates clearing and client access\nIn an Oct. 26 update, Hyperliquid outlined Payward’s proposed US markets, which would use optional HIP-3* permissioning and remain subject to regulatory approval. The announcement described preliminary specifications on testnet, with support for the configuration planned through a future network upgrade.\nPayward’s September announcement set out the proposed operating structure. Bitnomial, its regulated exchange and clearinghouse, would create, own and administer the markets while clearing and settling their contracts.\nNinjaTrader Clearing would carry customer accounts, and participants would need to complete onboarding and appear on both entities’ allowlists.\nPayward co-CEO Arjun Sethi described the company’s proposed role as “holding the keys and carrying the regulatory obligations.” Its release said the new contracts would be listed under Bitnomial Exchange’s rules, subject to regulatory approval.\n\n\n\n\n\n                Read more:\n            \n\n                TRX options reach Blockchain.com users with $5 minimum premium","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":false,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"isLaohu8Offline":false,"tenantId":"TBGLOBAL","deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.52.0","shortVersion":"4.52.0","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2679041549","isCrawlerRequest":true}