Individualistic talents vs Collectivism, which is better?
Individual icon has been the forefront of most if not all westernised enterprises with the likes of Henry Ford, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Jack Ma, etc. However, there's Collectivism success stories too. In between, it's undeniable that most hugely successful businessman rely on both a CEO with good foresight and an active board with multi- discipline expertise.
In Singapore, while the corporate worlds emulates US and western corporate governance, the country especially its GLC linked companies look towards collective consensus that is fronted by a helm man with the backing of Temasek or the country's sovereign fund. Hence, it's seldom that drastic failure of successor CEO and the company if a highly successful CEO leaves the company.
If I can humbly say my piece, DBS will survive depending more on collective decision making and long term strategy rather than on a individual. I will continue to maintain my holdings in DBS based on my set targets and the prevailing market environment.
Care to comment? Good luck!
?ay?
Comments
There are many people who have both individualistic talents and collectivist values, and who are able to successfully navigate both types of environments.
There is no one-size-fits-all answer to the question of whether individualistic talents or collectivism is better.
The best approach is likely to be the one that best suits the individual and the situation.
The best approach is likely to be a combination of both individualistic talents and collectivism.