$Alphabet(GOOG)$ It seems like the CEO is making changes out of desperation. He reacts instead of being proactive. That's the difference between a decent CEO and a great CEO. He knew early last year AI was going to be critical and companies like msft, meta, and amzn where going hot and heavy into that arena. Why the wait? Why did it take this long for him to come up with a couple of good decisions. He also knew there were problems with reviews. This has been mention today. It took him this long to take action even though he was put on notice from affected parties but ignored them. He seems to wait for lawsuits, then typically settles, then decides a change is needed. How about his setting up, as part of the reorg, a specific group to tests and evaluate. That should have been done after the Bard incident and not after another issue with 1.5.
Comments