glintzi
10-02

$Apple(AAPL)$ Of course Barclays HAD TO pull the rug out from under AAPL with dubious claims of weak iPhone 16 sales. Dubious because the claim is based solely on shipping lead times vs. last year without any regard to increased manufacturing output vs. last year. To be blunt, Barclays has no idea how 16 sales compare to 15 sales last year. And I say “HAD TO pull the rug out from under AAPL” because Barclays has unwaveringly rated AAPL “Underweight” since January 2 this year when AAPL closed at $185.00. Anyone shunning AAPL because of that rating in January has missed out on a gain of 26% based on the close the day before Barclays hit piece in an effort to save face.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment