Replying to @DeltaDrift:Number-To The Moon - Tiger Brokers Online Investing Community - To The Moon

Replying to @DeltaDrift:Number of qubits is just one factor. Research quantum volume, logical qubits and algorithmic qubits. //@DeltaDrift:I get your point, but I think it’s still down to the number of Qubits that determines the computing power. And at current stage, all these computing power is used to enhance the quantum computer itself. As I’ve mention, IONQ is seeking for commercialize, while other two big corporation could risk creating something with a larger scale.//@fibance:$IONQ Inc.(IONQ)$$IBM(IBM)$ Not all qubits are created equal. Ionq uses ion trap technologies while IBM (and Google) uses superconducting qubits.

Superconducting qubits are faster but they produce a lot of errors because they are manufactured. They also require near 0-kelvin refrigeration to operate.

Ion traps on the other hand are slower but has higher fidelity and can operate at room temperature. The connectivity between qubits is all-to-all which means certain operations are simpler.

Comparing simply by quantity is like saying 100 bicycles is better than 1 Lambo

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

1

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":383651004813560,"tweetId":"383651004813560","gmtCreate":1734696667489,"gmtModify":1734696672532,"author":{"id":4087298328464920,"idStr":"4087298328464920","authorId":4087298328464920,"authorIdStr":"4087298328464920","name":"fibance","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"93.61%","individualDisplayEnabled":0},"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":7,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"html":"<html><head></head><body>Replying to <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/U/10000000000011028\">@DeltaDrift</a>:Number of qubits is just one factor. Research quantum volume, logical qubits and algorithmic qubits. //<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/U/10000000000011028\">@DeltaDrift</a>:I get your point, but I think it’s still down to the number of Qubits that determines the computing power. And at current stage, all these computing power is used to enhance the quantum computer itself. As I’ve mention, IONQ is seeking for commercialize, while other two big corporation could risk creating something with a larger scale.//<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/U/4087298328464920\">@fibance</a>:<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/IONQ\">$IONQ Inc.(IONQ)$</a><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/IBM\">$IBM(IBM)$</a> Not all qubits are created equal. Ionq uses ion trap technologies while IBM (and Google) uses superconducting qubits. \n<br><br>\n<br>Superconducting qubits are faster but they produce a lot of errors because they are manufactured. They also require near 0-kelvin refrigeration to operate. \n<br><br>\n<br>Ion traps on the other hand are slower but has higher fidelity and can operate at room temperature. The connectivity between qubits is all-to-all which means certain operations are simpler. \n<br><br>\n<br>Comparing simply by quantity is like saying 100 bicycles is better than 1 Lambo</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>Replying to <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/U/10000000000011028\">@DeltaDrift</a>:Number of qubits is just one factor. Research quantum volume, logical qubits and algorithmic qubits. //<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/U/10000000000011028\">@DeltaDrift</a>:I get your point, but I think it’s still down to the number of Qubits that determines the computing power. And at current stage, all these computing power is used to enhance the quantum computer itself. As I’ve mention, IONQ is seeking for commercialize, while other two big corporation could risk creating something with a larger scale.//<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/U/4087298328464920\">@fibance</a>:<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/IONQ\">$IONQ Inc.(IONQ)$</a><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/IBM\">$IBM(IBM)$</a> Not all qubits are created equal. Ionq uses ion trap technologies while IBM (and Google) uses superconducting qubits. \n<br><br>\n<br>Superconducting qubits are faster but they produce a lot of errors because they are manufactured. They also require near 0-kelvin refrigeration to operate. \n<br><br>\n<br>Ion traps on the other hand are slower but has higher fidelity and can operate at room temperature. The connectivity between qubits is all-to-all which means certain operations are simpler. \n<br><br>\n<br>Comparing simply by quantity is like saying 100 bicycles is better than 1 Lambo</body></html>","text":"Replying to @DeltaDrift:Number of qubits is just one factor. Research quantum volume, logical qubits and algorithmic qubits. //@DeltaDrift:I get your point, but I think it’s still down to the number of Qubits that determines the computing power. And at current stage, all these computing power is used to enhance the quantum computer itself. As I’ve mention, IONQ is seeking for commercialize, while other two big corporation could risk creating something with a larger scale.//@fibance:$IONQ Inc.(IONQ)$$IBM(IBM)$ Not all qubits are created equal. Ionq uses ion trap technologies while IBM (and Google) uses superconducting qubits. Superconducting qubits are faster but they produce a lot of errors because they are manufactured. They also require near 0-kelvin refrigeration to operate. Ion traps on the other hand are slower but has higher fidelity and can operate at room temperature. The connectivity between qubits is all-to-all which means certain operations are simpler. Comparing simply by quantity is like saying 100 bicycles is better than 1 Lambo","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/383651004813560","repostId":0,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":64,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":["IBM","IONQ"],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":899,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/383651004813560"}