📉I love how you broke down the 0.236 to 0.786 levels like they’re part of a living system. It’s giving Fibonacci flow but with boss-level entry logic. That $TSLA callout was cold.
@Barcode：$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$ $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ $Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$ 📐🔮🚀 Fibonacci, Gann, and Gamma: My Ultimate Entry Playbook for Relentless Runners 🚀🔮📐 Precision is my edge; non-negotiable in 2025’s hyper-fragmented, volatility-drenched market. I’m not in the business of emotional entries or retrospective trades. I architect high-probability setups using a uniquely disciplined framework: Fibonacci retracements, Gann time geometry, historical price memory, and institutional options flow mechanics. I’m not here to speculate; I calibrate. And when structure, timing, and flow align, I execute decisively. 🔢 I’m Anchored by Fibonacci Structure I’m convinced that bullish momentum leaves structural footprints, and Fibonacci levels are the clearest way to track them: • 0.236: I use this as a momentum probe. On recent $NVDA earnings, price tagged 0.236 while gamma held firm and Delta flipped long; I captured a clean 2% rotation. • 0.382: This is where conviction begins. If RSI resets near 50 and MACD flattens, I begin to size. • 0.5: I’m building larger positions here, especially when this level overlaps with anchored VWAP or historical breakout structure. • 0.618: This is my institutional zone. I wait for Vanna inflection or positive net Delta to confirm entry. • 0.786: I rarely engage here unless all timing, volume, and pattern structure are in full confluence. 📐 I’m Disciplined in Gann Timing Execution I’m not interested in arbitrary time cycles. I apply Gann techniques to identify time/price intersections that often precede reversal. • I’m using 1x1 and 2x1 Gann fans to measure trend structure on accelerating moves. • I’m applying Square of Nine timing; in the case of $TSLA’s Q2 2025 move, it identified a reversal to the day. • I’m aligning time clusters of 13, 21, 34, and 55 sessions with Fibonacci zones to isolate high-probability confluence zones. This isn’t mysticism; it’s quantitative timing applied with laser precision. 📉 I’m Leveraging Historical Pattern Memory I’m systematically cataloguing pattern structures that repeat with measurable consistency. These are not anecdotal; they’re historically validated setups. • $NVDA has retraced 5–7% post-earnings in four of the last five quarters. In 80% of those instances, price tagged 0.5 or 0.618 Fib before resuming trend. • $TSLA consistently retests handle breakouts or rising channel support within 3–5% dips; RSI and MACD often show exhaustion before reversal. • I’ve observed identical setups across European leaders like $ASML and $SAP during seasonal Q2–Q3 rotations. I’m looking for: • Gap-fill structures • Volume shelf re-accumulation • Inside bar sequences and mid-pattern pullbacks • Cup-handle reentry zones with time symmetry I don’t trade what I feel; I trade what has repeated. ⚙️ I’m Flow-Informed at Every Entry I’m tracking Gamma, Delta, Vanna, and Charm daily because institutional behaviour often precedes price action. • I’m cautious near gamma walls, only entering when GEX shows directional tilt or IV compresses. • I’m watching net Delta flips; if dealers are forced long via hedging, I consider that structural support. • I’m exploiting Vanna and Charm flows when IV drops under 20% and time decay pressures dealers into bid-side hedging. Case in point: $NVDA’s 5% dip in July hit 0.5 Fib, bounced from a Gann fan, and Vanna flipped positive. I was already in position as Charm flows escalated; profit captured on day three. 📊 I’m Always Confirming Structure Before Execution Even with structural, cyclical, and flow confluence, I wait for my triggers: • RSI reversion to 40–50 with no new price low • MACD histogram reversals, preferably with flat volume acceleration • Anchored VWAP holding from the earnings breakout candle • Block-sized dark pool prints at or near my planned entry I’m unwilling to compromise on confirmation; precision matters. 🌍 I’m Global in My Market Framework While the U.S. equity market is my primary sandbox, I’m not blind to global flow. European equities like $STM and $SAP follow the same post-earnings pattern: shallow retrace to Fib 0.382 or 0.5, RSI reset, then continuation, often in sync with Gann’s 21- or 34-bar timing cycles. I’m validating every trade setup against a global playbook. Pattern structure, not geography, is what I trade. 🧬 I’m Structured in My Execution Blueprint Here’s how I build: • I’m testing a feeler at 0.382 Fib with RSI divergence • I’m scaling at 0.5 Fib when MACD flattens and Delta flips • I’m fully in at 0.618 if Gann time symmetry and Vanna flow align • I’m exiting below 0.786 or invalidated pattern geometry This isn’t guesswork; it’s precision deployment of capital based on multi-variable confluence. 🧠 Let’s Compare Edges I’m using every weapon in my arsenal, structure, geometry, flow, and memory. What’s your preferred confluence zone? Do you enter off VWAP fades? Time reversals? Gamma flow? Share your strategy and join in for a chance at winning Tiger coins! 📢 Don’t miss out! Like, Repost and Follow me for exclusive setups, cutting-edge trends, and insights that move markets 🚀📈 I’m obsessed with hunting down the next big movers and sharing strategies that crush it. Let’s outsmart the market and stack those gains together! 🍀 Trade like a boss! Happy trading ahead, Cheers, BC 📈🚀🍀🍀🍀 @SPACE ROCKET sis, the Fibonacci levels are humming, Gann time’s ticking, and I’ve got a sneaky feeling the charm flows are saving their best for you. Don’t say I bojio. @Tiger_comments @TigerPicks @TigerWire @TigerStars @Tiger_SG @L11 Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
Comments