zhingle
01-26 22:58
$Apple(AAPL)$  

🍎 APPLE SLIDES FOR 8 STRAIGHT WEEKS — CAPITULATION OR VALUE TRAP?

Apple has now fallen eight consecutive weeks, its longest losing streak since May 2022 📉

Fund flows have quietly turned negative, making AAPL one of the least-loved names within the Mag 7 since mid-last year — a rare position for the market’s former safety blanket.

The big question now:

Is this finally a capitulation low… or just the market repricing Apple’s AI gap?

🔄 Why Apple Is Lagging While Big Tech Rallies

While Nvidia, Microsoft, and Meta ride the AI capex wave 🚀, Apple is stuck in an uncomfortable middle ground:

1️⃣ AI Without the Hype (Yet)

• Apple’s AI strategy remains opaque

• Focus is on on-device AI, privacy-first architecture

• Powerful, yes — but harder to monetise quickly

Markets don’t price patience well.

In a cycle where investors reward immediate AI revenue visibility, Apple’s “wait-and-integrate” approach feels… slow ⏳

2️⃣ Margin Anxiety Is Creeping In

AI hardware demand is driving:

• Memory prices up 40–50% 💾

• Component costs rising just as consumers turn price-sensitive

Apple thrives on:

👉 scale

👉 margin discipline

But higher input costs + limited near-term AI pricing power = earnings multiple compression risk, at least tactically.

📊 Yet… Fundamentals Aren’t Breaking

This is where the bearish narrative starts to wobble.

Goldman Sachs expects:

• +11% YoY revenue growth in Q1

• Strong Services resilience

• Continued ecosystem stickiness

• $320 target price intact 🎯

Let’s not forget:

• Apple still generates massive free cash flow

• Buybacks provide a constant bid 🧲

• Installed base keeps expanding, even in slower hardware cycles

This isn’t a broken business — it’s a story stock temporarily without a story.

🧠 Is This Capitulation?

Eight red weeks sounds ugly — and that’s exactly why it matters.

Historically:

• Extended down streaks often coincide with sentiment exhaustion

• Weak hands exit

• Positioning resets

But capitulation only sticks if:

• Earnings don’t disappoint

• Guidance doesn’t shock lower

This earnings call is less about Q1 numbers and more about narrative repair.

🤖 The AI Question That Matters

The real risk isn’t that Apple misses AI.

The risk is that:

👉 the market decides Apple’s AI advantage is defensive, not offensive

If Apple frames AI as:

• Enhancing ecosystem stickiness

• Driving Services engagement

• Supporting premium pricing over time

That’s fine for long-term holders 📈

But momentum investors may still rotate elsewhere.

🎯 So… Buy the Dip or Wait?

🔹 Dip buyers:

This is the cleanest technical reset Apple has had in years. Valuation has cooled, sentiment is washed, and expectations are no longer euphoric.

🔹 Conservative traders:

Waiting for proof of AI monetisation or clearer guidance may mean missing the first leg — but reduces narrative risk.

🔹 Long-term investors:

Apple rarely looks cheap optically, but it often looks cheapest when it’s boring.

🧩 Final Thought

Apple doesn’t usually bottom on hype — it bottoms on fatigue.

Eight down weeks feels like fatigue.

Earnings will tell us whether it turns into renewed conviction… or just a dead-cat bounce 🐱

JPM Expects Apple to Beat! Can Strong iPhone 17 Demand Offset Margin Pressure?
JPMorgan Chase expects Apple to beat market expectations in FY26 Q1, citing stronger-than-expected iPhone demand and lower operating expenses. The bank reiterated an Overweight rating and raised its price target to $315 from $305 ahead of Apple’s earnings on Thursday. Can strong iPhone 17 demand offset margin pressure from higher memory costs? If Apple beats expectations, is this enough to reverse recent underperformance?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment