I am obviously on google and amazon's side.
They made the rights moves with the available resources, while microsoft felt like they kept trying to force changes with the success they had from investing in openai and having the first mover's advantage.
Microsoft failed to understand that they should have branched out organically, instead of trying to force feed new functionalities down the throats of existing users who were happy to varying degrees with the status quo. By making hasty moves, and not listening to feedback, they lost ground to others who were later to the game. Hopefully someone is there to steer things the right way, before it is too late.
Big Tech Earnings: The AI Trillion-Dollar Reckoning — How Do You See It?
Big tech will report in unison this week in the market's first comprehensive, simultaneous audit of AI capex ROI — the five giants have collectively deployed over $100 billion in AI infrastructure over the past two years. Two thematic lines dominate: cloud growth rates (Azure vs. AWS vs. GCP) and ad ARPU efficiency (META vs. GOOG).
AAPL's supply chain risk and Ternus succession uncertainty remain standalone downside variables, decoupled from the broader AI narrative. Five scorecards due simultaneously — whose AI investment will be the first to convert into tangible margin improvement?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
Comments