glowzi
07-30 00:12

$Intel(INTC)$  A quick technical look at INTC.

RSI(14) is around 32.17, with the secondary line near 39. The classic oversold threshold is below 30, and 32 is firmly in the zone, grinding lower through the July sell-off. Not yet the sub-20 panic readings Intel has seen in deeper bear phases, but clearly stretched.

Williams %R(14) is at -99.35. That is about as oversold as the indicator can get on a 0 to -100 scale. A reading pinned near the absolute floor means the current close is essentially the lowest low of the entire 14-day lookback. Readings below -80 are already oversold; stuck near -100 is fully exhausted selling territory.

Ulcer Index(14) is at 23.79. That is elevated. Ulcer measures the depth and duration of drawdowns from recent highs, and values above 10-15 already signal meaningful downside stress. 23+ reflects the sharp roughly 40% pullback from the late-June high around 142. High Ulcer readings often coincide with selling climax zones because the pain is already largely realized.

TMO / TTM Squeeze is deeply negative, with TMO at -87 and -85, and the squeeze line near zero. Momentum is still firmly down, but the extreme oscillator cluster and squeeze compression frequently precedes a volatility expansion the other way.

Some broader context from Intel's history and general oscillator behavior on high-beta semis: when Williams pins near -100 and RSI is sub-35 while price holds above the rising 200-EMA (currently around 75), short-term mean-reversion moves of 8-18% over the next 5-15 sessions have been common in prior cycles. The best ones occur after a parabolic prior run, which is exactly the case here, with the stock moving from roughly 19 lows in 2025 to 142 in under a year. Pure RSI below 30-35 events have produced similar relief rallies, though the magnitude depends on whether the broader tape cooperates and whether volume confirms the bounce. Extreme Ulcer spikes above 20 after a multi-week waterfall often mark local exhaustion rather than the start of a new leg down, especially when they coincide with the other two oscillators.

Intel can stay oversold longer than feels reasonable in strong sector rotations or if the broader market is risk-off. A clean bounce still needs a higher low, with Williams turning up through -80 and RSI reclaiming 40-45 with expanding volume.

On the chart, there has been a series of large red daily candles with expanding volume, with Jul 28 alone seeing more than 148-150 million shares. Jul 28 printed a notable lower wick, with a low of 83.10 and a close of 86.30, showing some responsive buying at the lows. Right now the stock is retesting that 83 zone hard, with the screenshot showing a low around 83.08. This sits right on the confluence of the lower Bollinger Band around 81.25, the 0.5 Fibonacci retracement of the big 2025-26 advance around 80, an options max-pain cluster around 82.5, and the rising 200-EMA still well below around 75.

Historically for Intel, these clusters have produced tradable bounces, often sharp ones, especially while the longer-term uptrend structure above the 200-EMA remains intact. The risk is another 5-8% flush if the 83/81 zone fails on high volume. The reward on a successful defense is a relief rally that can easily stretch back toward the mid-90s or the declining 20-EMA cluster. Watching for Williams to lift off -100 and for volume to expand on any green close as the first confirmation.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment