Since quotations and public remarks seem to be so popular,
JO might as well contribute one as well.
-
The arguments are coherent.
The evidence is presented.
Well done.
-
The fact that newly built homes carry higher construction costs is undeniable.
That is simply the current reality.
However,
higher replacement costs do not automatically guarantee that existing properties—
whether old, aging, or recently built—
can indefinitely sustain today's market valuations.
-
Furthermore,
credit conditions have tightened.
Housing vacancies continue to accumulate.
At the same time,
persistent inflation has pushed the cost of living materially higher.
-
Second,
birth rates continue to decline.
Single-parent households have become increasingly common.
This is not a criticism of any family structure.
It is merely a reflection of ongoing demographic and social trends.
Combined with elevated divorce rates,
household formation dynamics are changing.
-
Third,
every newly purchased home typically implies that another property enters the secondary market.
New supply does not emerge in isolation.
Existing inventory does not simply disappear.
-
Looking further ahead,
multiple demographic projections indicate substantial population contraction over the coming decades,
alongside a shrinking working-age population and slower household growth.
-
Which leads to a rather straightforward question:
Supply can be measured.
Construction costs can be calculated.
Valuations can be debated.
Narratives can be promoted.
-
But ultimately,
where does the future demand come from?
Where is the next generation of buyers?
-
This is not a question of optimism or pessimism.
It is a question of demographics,
credit formation,
household creation,
and long-term purchasing capacity.
-
The issue has never been whether an asset can be priced higher.
The issue is whether sufficient buyers remain willing and able to absorb that supply.
-
Still thought-provoking.
Not anchored to the individual.
Not anchored to the region.
Anchored only to structure.
Comments
發牢騷歸發牢騷
抱怨也一樣
日子依舊得繼續
明明是搖錢樹及資本匯集地
每每卻有不少聲浪
悔恨當初
甚至高喊持股佔比怎那麼少
當然了
更多人看的是當下
而很多時候
反而卻抓不準
所以才要求最基本的條例
要是連基本條例
都無法恪守的行為
現實也已經看得很清楚
只是不愿意承認
ob iergendeen sech schonn emol gefrot huet
Wat gëtt engem de Courage,
géint de Maart ze wetten,
oder mam Maart ze bleiwen.
—
All Positioun huet e Präis
All Iwwerzeegung huet e Risiko
An all Risiko huet eng Ursaach.
挺佩服一些殘殺性質
及自虐行為
地表上也確實
真的處處遍地滿玄機
正所謂
法律並不完全維護正義及公道
No money
No Freedom
<轉述>
Morning