well, they wanted to stop Trum

well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄. I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉

Digital Asset Market Structure Bill Fails 49-50 in Senate Vote, Passage Odds Plummet to 5%

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":608458151571456,"tweetId":"608458151571456","gmtCreate":1789563738951,"gmtModify":1789564218352,"author":{"id":4092135148477260,"idStr":"4092135148477260","authorId":4092135148477260,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":3,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄. I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉&nbsp;</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄. I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉&nbsp;</p></body></html>","text":"well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄. I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/608458151571456","repostId":1190705481,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1190705481","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Global Stock News First-Time Broadcast","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Stock News","id":"1036600163","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/b3bf6d02ad1a6e9e7377eebbb162346a"},"pubTimestamp":1789531406,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190705481?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-09-16 12:03","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Digital Asset Market Structure Bill Fails 49-50 in Senate Vote, Passage Odds Plummet to 5%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190705481","media":"Stock News","summary":"A procedural vote on the CLARITY Act in the US Senate ended in a 49-50 defeat, falling well short of the 60-vote threshold needed to advance. The outcome reignited the core conflict between...","content":"<p>A procedural vote on the CLARITY Act in the US Senate ended in a 49-50 defeat, falling well short of the 60-vote threshold needed to advance. The outcome reignited the core conflict between Republicans and Democrats over crypto regulatory frameworks, with at least three Republican senators declining to support the measure despite the party holding 53 seats. This marks the second time the bill has been delayed in over a year of negotiations, as it remains stuck at this critical juncture.<br><br>Market participants reacted swiftly and sharply to the news. Early on September 16 Beijing time, Bitcoin briefly dipped near the $75,000 mark, while crypto-linked stocks such as <b>Coinbase</b> (COIN.US), <b>Circle</b>, <b>Robinhood</b> (HOOD.US), and <b>MicroStrategy</b> (MSTR.US) all came under selling pressure. On the prediction market Polymarket, the probability of the bill becoming law by the end of 2026 tumbled from above 30% at the start of the week to roughly 5%. That steep drop vividly captures the market's increasingly pessimistic outlook on the legislative path forward.<br><br>The failed vote not only dampened short-term sentiment but also left the industry questioning whether a 60-vote coalition can be rebuilt within the year. No clear timeline has emerged, adding to the uncertainty. The political roots of this defeat run deep, anchored in ethical impasses within the Democratic caucus. Republicans released the final text on September 14, but Democratic negotiators rejected it and submitted a counterproposal just hours before the vote. Mark Warner later explained that while disagreements over enforcement and national security were close to resolution, unresolved conflicts of interest involving public officials profiting from the crypto industry led him to vote no. Other Democrats involved in talks, including Ruben Gallego, Angela Alsobrooks, Kirsten Gillibrand, Catherine Cortez Masto, and Cory Booker, also sided against the measure.<br><br>The counterproposal centered on expanding restrictions, mandating forced divestiture of certain crypto company holdings, tightening enforcement and sponsor disclosure requirements, and adding DeFi-related safeguards. However, the revised text still failed to restore the criminal safe harbor provisions for developers, miners, and validators found in the BRCA (Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act). A spokesperson for Cynthia Lummis's office, Katie Warbinton, responded that if Democrats genuinely wanted a deal, they should engage in real negotiations rather than re-submitting the same demands and calling it progress. Neither side budged before the vote, sealing the breakdown.<br><br>Republicans had made notable concessions ahead of this round, primarily across four areas based on the July merged draft: ethics, stablecoin yields, DeFi and developer protections, and agricultural committee provisions. On the ethics front, President Trump accepted roughly 80% of the Thom Tillis and Ruben Gallego proposal, requiring federal elected officials, judges, and their spouses who hold significant economic interests in token issuers to divest those positions or place them in a blind trust. State attorneys general were granted limited enforcement authority for the first time, but only to sue trading platforms that list non-compliant assets, with no jurisdiction over the President himself. Previously, this power rested solely with the federal Attorney General. The provision is set to sunset in 2029, and existing holdings are not subject to forced liquidation.<br><br>On stablecoin yields, payment stablecoins cannot in principle pay passive interest simply for user holding, but a new 18-month circuit breaker mechanism was included. If signs emerge of large-scale deposit outflows from community banks into stablecoins, federal regulators could step in, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent having the final say on triggering the mechanism. This was a direct response to months of banking industry lobbying, but eight groups including the American Bankers Association remain unconvinced, arguing the circuit breaker only activates after deposits have already fled.<br><br>For DeFi and developer protections, decentralization was split into two scenarios. On one side, validators, node operators, and those who publish wallet software that never touch user assets receive clearer safe harbor exemptions. On the other, trading protocols that are nominally decentralized but still retain control must register with the CFTC and comply with the Bank Secrecy Act. The BRCA was simultaneously narrowed, dropping the language extending to criminal cases and leaving only banking secrecy and civil protections.<br><br>This vote creates a new dividing line with profound implications for exchanges, stablecoins, and protocols. For exchanges, the real shift lies in the compliance costs of listing assets. The ethics provision grants state attorneys general the right to sue, meaning exchanges must now consider not just federal compliance red lines but also state-level enforcement risks when vetting tokens. Eighteen state attorneys general, led by Letitia James, sent a joint letter before the vote claiming the text weakens the first line of defense against fraud. Miles Jennings, head of policy at a16z crypto, argued that arrangements like customer asset segregation, qualified custody, and restrictions on affiliate conflicts of interest are precisely the mechanisms missing during FTX, making the bill essentially an effort to transplant long-standing traditional finance rules into the crypto industry. Nate Geraci, President of ETF Store, cautioned that these changes mostly enhance certainty and accelerate innovation, but the bill itself is not the decisive variable shaping crypto's trajectory.<br><br>For stablecoin issuers and their banking partners, the 18-month circuit breaker fails to genuinely address the banking sector's core worries, a concrete reason behind Republican defections. The American Bankers Association and seven other groups wrote to Senate leaders from both parties, arguing the circuit breaker only kicks in after mass deposit outflows have already occurred, making it no real safeguard. Republican Senator John Cornyn stated publicly before the vote that the new text may still not resolve community bank concerns, leaving him counted among potential no votes. The White House Council of Economic Advisers attempted to counter claims that stablecoin growth squeezes community bank deposits with an interactive tool, but that did not shift the stance of banking groups or lawmakers like Cornyn.<br><br>For protocols, the true dividing line is whether teams are willing to relinquish control, and this line satisfies no one. Developer advocacy group Coin Center expressed disappointment over the narrowed BRCA protections, arguing that removing criminal case extensions weakens the developer safeguards previously secured. Galaxy Digital founder Mike Novogratz cited insufficient developer protections as a reason why at least four Republican senators opposed the bill, indicating this dissatisfaction extends beyond the developer community and into the Republican base itself.<br><br>Despite the bill's failure, the regulatory process has not been reset to zero. Novogratz previously warned that without progress, the US could go a long time without crypto legislation, or perhaps never, pushing more of the industry offshore. White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt also noted that once a procedural vote fails, the next opportunity is anyone's guess. However, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins made clear that the SEC will continue advancing Project Crypto-related agendas regardless of the bill's outcome, including crafting rules for crypto asset issuance, incorporating blockchain ownership ledgers into transfer agent regulations, and clarifying custody requirements for investment advisers and regulated funds. Grayscale Research head Zach Pandl pointed out that regulatory frameworks for stablecoins, token issuance, tokenized securities, and perpetual futures are already being clarified, with the GENIUS Act having established a federal framework for payment stablecoins. Bernstein cautioned that if legislative hurdles combine with tighter monetary policy signals, crypto assets and crypto-linked equities could experience significant drawdowns.<br><br>This text, which Republicans called the \"last best and final\" offer, failed to secure 60 votes but leaves behind a baseline of Republican willingness to compromise, potentially serving as a starting point for future negotiations. Following multiple legislative attempts gone awry, the market once again contends with a complex landscape of regulatory uncertainty and policy gamesmanship.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Digital Asset Market Structure Bill Fails 49-50 in Senate Vote, Passage Odds Plummet to 5%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDigital Asset Market Structure Bill Fails 49-50 in Senate Vote, Passage Odds Plummet to 5%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036600163\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/b3bf6d02ad1a6e9e7377eebbb162346a);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Stock News </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-09-16 12:03</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>A procedural vote on the CLARITY Act in the US Senate ended in a 49-50 defeat, falling well short of the 60-vote threshold needed to advance. The outcome reignited the core conflict between Republicans and Democrats over crypto regulatory frameworks, with at least three Republican senators declining to support the measure despite the party holding 53 seats. This marks the second time the bill has been delayed in over a year of negotiations, as it remains stuck at this critical juncture.<br><br>Market participants reacted swiftly and sharply to the news. Early on September 16 Beijing time, Bitcoin briefly dipped near the $75,000 mark, while crypto-linked stocks such as <b>Coinbase</b> (COIN.US), <b>Circle</b>, <b>Robinhood</b> (HOOD.US), and <b>MicroStrategy</b> (MSTR.US) all came under selling pressure. On the prediction market Polymarket, the probability of the bill becoming law by the end of 2026 tumbled from above 30% at the start of the week to roughly 5%. That steep drop vividly captures the market's increasingly pessimistic outlook on the legislative path forward.<br><br>The failed vote not only dampened short-term sentiment but also left the industry questioning whether a 60-vote coalition can be rebuilt within the year. No clear timeline has emerged, adding to the uncertainty. The political roots of this defeat run deep, anchored in ethical impasses within the Democratic caucus. Republicans released the final text on September 14, but Democratic negotiators rejected it and submitted a counterproposal just hours before the vote. Mark Warner later explained that while disagreements over enforcement and national security were close to resolution, unresolved conflicts of interest involving public officials profiting from the crypto industry led him to vote no. Other Democrats involved in talks, including Ruben Gallego, Angela Alsobrooks, Kirsten Gillibrand, Catherine Cortez Masto, and Cory Booker, also sided against the measure.<br><br>The counterproposal centered on expanding restrictions, mandating forced divestiture of certain crypto company holdings, tightening enforcement and sponsor disclosure requirements, and adding DeFi-related safeguards. However, the revised text still failed to restore the criminal safe harbor provisions for developers, miners, and validators found in the BRCA (Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act). A spokesperson for Cynthia Lummis's office, Katie Warbinton, responded that if Democrats genuinely wanted a deal, they should engage in real negotiations rather than re-submitting the same demands and calling it progress. Neither side budged before the vote, sealing the breakdown.<br><br>Republicans had made notable concessions ahead of this round, primarily across four areas based on the July merged draft: ethics, stablecoin yields, DeFi and developer protections, and agricultural committee provisions. On the ethics front, President Trump accepted roughly 80% of the Thom Tillis and Ruben Gallego proposal, requiring federal elected officials, judges, and their spouses who hold significant economic interests in token issuers to divest those positions or place them in a blind trust. State attorneys general were granted limited enforcement authority for the first time, but only to sue trading platforms that list non-compliant assets, with no jurisdiction over the President himself. Previously, this power rested solely with the federal Attorney General. The provision is set to sunset in 2029, and existing holdings are not subject to forced liquidation.<br><br>On stablecoin yields, payment stablecoins cannot in principle pay passive interest simply for user holding, but a new 18-month circuit breaker mechanism was included. If signs emerge of large-scale deposit outflows from community banks into stablecoins, federal regulators could step in, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent having the final say on triggering the mechanism. This was a direct response to months of banking industry lobbying, but eight groups including the American Bankers Association remain unconvinced, arguing the circuit breaker only activates after deposits have already fled.<br><br>For DeFi and developer protections, decentralization was split into two scenarios. On one side, validators, node operators, and those who publish wallet software that never touch user assets receive clearer safe harbor exemptions. On the other, trading protocols that are nominally decentralized but still retain control must register with the CFTC and comply with the Bank Secrecy Act. The BRCA was simultaneously narrowed, dropping the language extending to criminal cases and leaving only banking secrecy and civil protections.<br><br>This vote creates a new dividing line with profound implications for exchanges, stablecoins, and protocols. For exchanges, the real shift lies in the compliance costs of listing assets. The ethics provision grants state attorneys general the right to sue, meaning exchanges must now consider not just federal compliance red lines but also state-level enforcement risks when vetting tokens. Eighteen state attorneys general, led by Letitia James, sent a joint letter before the vote claiming the text weakens the first line of defense against fraud. Miles Jennings, head of policy at a16z crypto, argued that arrangements like customer asset segregation, qualified custody, and restrictions on affiliate conflicts of interest are precisely the mechanisms missing during FTX, making the bill essentially an effort to transplant long-standing traditional finance rules into the crypto industry. Nate Geraci, President of ETF Store, cautioned that these changes mostly enhance certainty and accelerate innovation, but the bill itself is not the decisive variable shaping crypto's trajectory.<br><br>For stablecoin issuers and their banking partners, the 18-month circuit breaker fails to genuinely address the banking sector's core worries, a concrete reason behind Republican defections. The American Bankers Association and seven other groups wrote to Senate leaders from both parties, arguing the circuit breaker only kicks in after mass deposit outflows have already occurred, making it no real safeguard. Republican Senator John Cornyn stated publicly before the vote that the new text may still not resolve community bank concerns, leaving him counted among potential no votes. The White House Council of Economic Advisers attempted to counter claims that stablecoin growth squeezes community bank deposits with an interactive tool, but that did not shift the stance of banking groups or lawmakers like Cornyn.<br><br>For protocols, the true dividing line is whether teams are willing to relinquish control, and this line satisfies no one. Developer advocacy group Coin Center expressed disappointment over the narrowed BRCA protections, arguing that removing criminal case extensions weakens the developer safeguards previously secured. Galaxy Digital founder Mike Novogratz cited insufficient developer protections as a reason why at least four Republican senators opposed the bill, indicating this dissatisfaction extends beyond the developer community and into the Republican base itself.<br><br>Despite the bill's failure, the regulatory process has not been reset to zero. Novogratz previously warned that without progress, the US could go a long time without crypto legislation, or perhaps never, pushing more of the industry offshore. White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt also noted that once a procedural vote fails, the next opportunity is anyone's guess. However, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins made clear that the SEC will continue advancing Project Crypto-related agendas regardless of the bill's outcome, including crafting rules for crypto asset issuance, incorporating blockchain ownership ledgers into transfer agent regulations, and clarifying custody requirements for investment advisers and regulated funds. Grayscale Research head Zach Pandl pointed out that regulatory frameworks for stablecoins, token issuance, tokenized securities, and perpetual futures are already being clarified, with the GENIUS Act having established a federal framework for payment stablecoins. Bernstein cautioned that if legislative hurdles combine with tighter monetary policy signals, crypto assets and crypto-linked equities could experience significant drawdowns.<br><br>This text, which Republicans called the \"last best and final\" offer, failed to secure 60 votes but leaves behind a baseline of Republican willingness to compromise, potentially serving as a starting point for future negotiations. Following multiple legislative attempts gone awry, the market once again contends with a complex landscape of regulatory uncertainty and policy gamesmanship.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU2360107671.USD":"BGF FINTECH \"A4\" (USD) INC","CRCO":"YIELDMAX CRCL OPTION INCOME STRATEGY ETF","LU0106831901.USD":"贝莱德世界金融基金A2","LU1668664300.SGD":"Blackrock World Financials A2 SGD-H","BKCH":"AdvisorShares Sabretooth ETF","ICRC":"Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF","LU1861558580.USD":"日兴方舟颠覆性创新基金B","LU1791807156.HKD":"BGF WORLD FINANCIALS \"A2\" (HKDHDG) ACC","LU1861217088.USD":"贝莱德金融科技A2","LU1861220207.SGD":"Blackrock FinTech A2 SGD-H","IBLC":"iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF","CRCA":"Proshares Ultra CRCL","CIR":"2倍做多CRCL ETF-Corgi","CRCD":"T-REX 2X Inverse CRCLDaily Target ETF","CRCL":"Circle Internet Corp.","BK4023":"应用软件","LU1861559042.SGD":"日兴方舟颠覆性创新基金B SGD","CCUP":"T-REX 2x Long CRCL Daily Target ETF","BLCK":"Corgi Crypto Infrastructure ETF","CRCG":"2倍做多CRCL ETF-Leverage Shares"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190705481","content_text":"A procedural vote on the CLARITY Act in the US Senate ended in a 49-50 defeat, falling well short of the 60-vote threshold needed to advance. The outcome reignited the core conflict between Republicans and Democrats over crypto regulatory frameworks, with at least three Republican senators declining to support the measure despite the party holding 53 seats. This marks the second time the bill has been delayed in over a year of negotiations, as it remains stuck at this critical juncture.Market participants reacted swiftly and sharply to the news. Early on September 16 Beijing time, Bitcoin briefly dipped near the $75,000 mark, while crypto-linked stocks such as Coinbase (COIN.US), Circle, Robinhood (HOOD.US), and MicroStrategy (MSTR.US) all came under selling pressure. On the prediction market Polymarket, the probability of the bill becoming law by the end of 2026 tumbled from above 30% at the start of the week to roughly 5%. That steep drop vividly captures the market's increasingly pessimistic outlook on the legislative path forward.The failed vote not only dampened short-term sentiment but also left the industry questioning whether a 60-vote coalition can be rebuilt within the year. No clear timeline has emerged, adding to the uncertainty. The political roots of this defeat run deep, anchored in ethical impasses within the Democratic caucus. Republicans released the final text on September 14, but Democratic negotiators rejected it and submitted a counterproposal just hours before the vote. Mark Warner later explained that while disagreements over enforcement and national security were close to resolution, unresolved conflicts of interest involving public officials profiting from the crypto industry led him to vote no. Other Democrats involved in talks, including Ruben Gallego, Angela Alsobrooks, Kirsten Gillibrand, Catherine Cortez Masto, and Cory Booker, also sided against the measure.The counterproposal centered on expanding restrictions, mandating forced divestiture of certain crypto company holdings, tightening enforcement and sponsor disclosure requirements, and adding DeFi-related safeguards. However, the revised text still failed to restore the criminal safe harbor provisions for developers, miners, and validators found in the BRCA (Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act). A spokesperson for Cynthia Lummis's office, Katie Warbinton, responded that if Democrats genuinely wanted a deal, they should engage in real negotiations rather than re-submitting the same demands and calling it progress. Neither side budged before the vote, sealing the breakdown.Republicans had made notable concessions ahead of this round, primarily across four areas based on the July merged draft: ethics, stablecoin yields, DeFi and developer protections, and agricultural committee provisions. On the ethics front, President Trump accepted roughly 80% of the Thom Tillis and Ruben Gallego proposal, requiring federal elected officials, judges, and their spouses who hold significant economic interests in token issuers to divest those positions or place them in a blind trust. State attorneys general were granted limited enforcement authority for the first time, but only to sue trading platforms that list non-compliant assets, with no jurisdiction over the President himself. Previously, this power rested solely with the federal Attorney General. The provision is set to sunset in 2029, and existing holdings are not subject to forced liquidation.On stablecoin yields, payment stablecoins cannot in principle pay passive interest simply for user holding, but a new 18-month circuit breaker mechanism was included. If signs emerge of large-scale deposit outflows from community banks into stablecoins, federal regulators could step in, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent having the final say on triggering the mechanism. This was a direct response to months of banking industry lobbying, but eight groups including the American Bankers Association remain unconvinced, arguing the circuit breaker only activates after deposits have already fled.For DeFi and developer protections, decentralization was split into two scenarios. On one side, validators, node operators, and those who publish wallet software that never touch user assets receive clearer safe harbor exemptions. On the other, trading protocols that are nominally decentralized but still retain control must register with the CFTC and comply with the Bank Secrecy Act. The BRCA was simultaneously narrowed, dropping the language extending to criminal cases and leaving only banking secrecy and civil protections.This vote creates a new dividing line with profound implications for exchanges, stablecoins, and protocols. For exchanges, the real shift lies in the compliance costs of listing assets. The ethics provision grants state attorneys general the right to sue, meaning exchanges must now consider not just federal compliance red lines but also state-level enforcement risks when vetting tokens. Eighteen state attorneys general, led by Letitia James, sent a joint letter before the vote claiming the text weakens the first line of defense against fraud. Miles Jennings, head of policy at a16z crypto, argued that arrangements like customer asset segregation, qualified custody, and restrictions on affiliate conflicts of interest are precisely the mechanisms missing during FTX, making the bill essentially an effort to transplant long-standing traditional finance rules into the crypto industry. Nate Geraci, President of ETF Store, cautioned that these changes mostly enhance certainty and accelerate innovation, but the bill itself is not the decisive variable shaping crypto's trajectory.For stablecoin issuers and their banking partners, the 18-month circuit breaker fails to genuinely address the banking sector's core worries, a concrete reason behind Republican defections. The American Bankers Association and seven other groups wrote to Senate leaders from both parties, arguing the circuit breaker only kicks in after mass deposit outflows have already occurred, making it no real safeguard. Republican Senator John Cornyn stated publicly before the vote that the new text may still not resolve community bank concerns, leaving him counted among potential no votes. The White House Council of Economic Advisers attempted to counter claims that stablecoin growth squeezes community bank deposits with an interactive tool, but that did not shift the stance of banking groups or lawmakers like Cornyn.For protocols, the true dividing line is whether teams are willing to relinquish control, and this line satisfies no one. Developer advocacy group Coin Center expressed disappointment over the narrowed BRCA protections, arguing that removing criminal case extensions weakens the developer safeguards previously secured. Galaxy Digital founder Mike Novogratz cited insufficient developer protections as a reason why at least four Republican senators opposed the bill, indicating this dissatisfaction extends beyond the developer community and into the Republican base itself.Despite the bill's failure, the regulatory process has not been reset to zero. Novogratz previously warned that without progress, the US could go a long time without crypto legislation, or perhaps never, pushing more of the industry offshore. White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt also noted that once a procedural vote fails, the next opportunity is anyone's guess. However, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins made clear that the SEC will continue advancing Project Crypto-related agendas regardless of the bill's outcome, including crafting rules for crypto asset issuance, incorporating blockchain ownership ledgers into transfer agent regulations, and clarifying custody requirements for investment advisers and regulated funds. Grayscale Research head Zach Pandl pointed out that regulatory frameworks for stablecoins, token issuance, tokenized securities, and perpetual futures are already being clarified, with the GENIUS Act having established a federal framework for payment stablecoins. Bernstein cautioned that if legislative hurdles combine with tighter monetary policy signals, crypto assets and crypto-linked equities could experience significant drawdowns.This text, which Republicans called the \"last best and final\" offer, failed to secure 60 votes but leaves behind a baseline of Republican willingness to compromise, potentially serving as a starting point for future negotiations. Following multiple legislative attempts gone awry, the market once again contends with a complex landscape of regulatory uncertainty and policy gamesmanship.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CRCL":1,"BKCH":1,"CRCD":1,"CCUP":1,"CRCO":1,"CRCA":1,"CIR":1,"CRCG":1,"IBLC":1,"BLCK":1,"ICRC":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":78,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":198,"optionInvolvedFlag":false,"subscribersOnly":false,"subscribersOnlyAccessible":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/608458151571456"}