5% Yields vs Nasdaq: Which One Blinks First?

D1ane
09-28 13:51

The bond market is sending a pretty clear message.

The US 10-year Treasury yield pushed above 5%, reaching around 5.23% on Friday — its highest level since 2007. Yet the Nasdaq-100 still finished the week roughly 3% higher and remained close to record highs. 

That creates an interesting market tension.

Higher Treasury yields increase the return investors can get from relatively low-risk assets and raise the discount rate used to value future corporate earnings. In theory, that creates more pressure on high-growth stocks.

But the Nasdaq is holding up.

Why?

Earnings expectations are doing some of the heavy lifting.

If companies can continue delivering strong revenue and profit growth, investors may be willing to tolerate a higher discount rate. But if earnings momentum starts slowing, a 5%+ Treasury yield could become much harder for elevated equity valuations to ignore.

So I don’t think the real question is simply:

“Will 5% yields break the Nasdaq?”

The more interesting question is:

Can earnings growth keep outrunning the valuation pressure from higher rates?

That could be one of the biggest tests for tech stocks heading into the next earnings cycle.

QQQ Drops 1%+ — Can Elevated Yields Break the Tech Bull?
The Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) closed down 1.07% Monday, with the S&P 500 and Dow Jones also retreating as elevated Treasury yields remained the primary headwind for growth stocks; investors shrugged off news of Trump easing Iran sanctions. Session rotation was pronounced — high-beta sectors led by semiconductors bore the brunt as funds locked in tech gains. With yields and the AI thesis in direct conflict, is this tech pullback a healthy rotation — or the first crack in a mid-cycle bull market?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment