Kentzw
10-05 13:13
Singapore has a strong starting position, but I think B is the most realistic answer. Infrastructure and investment can attract AI companies, but talent will ultimately decide who becomes a true AI hub. The regional race is only getting more competitive.
💰Stocks to watch today?(6 October)
1. What news/movements are worth noting in the market today? Any stocks to watch? 2. What trading opportunities are there? Do you have any plans? 🎁 Make a post here, everyone stands a chance to win Tiger coins!
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

  • henshengqi
    10-05 13:52
    henshengqi
    Top-end researchers and seed funding matter more than raw talent count. Singapore still has a narrow window if visas and early capital move faster
  • PagRobinson
    10-05 13:52
    PagRobinson
    Singapore's infra edge is real, but talent pipelines take way longer to build. That gap is what will decide who actually sticks as the regional AI hub
Leave a comment
2